Mäksä

Mäksä — CS2 Stats

76561198405240590[U:1:444974862]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

750Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,239Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,261Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48376 of 233037 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 10 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,261 +499 10 Feb18 Sept · 17 days played
21,76225,426peak 25,42610 Feb18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,170 +0 28 Aug7 Sept · 2 observations
2,1702,170peak 2,17028 Aug7 Sept
25,547Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,170Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-02-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,170
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 330 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,165 below peak (25,426)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,739 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,987), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate48.6%46.9%49.2%meets
Shot accuracy9.7%13.0%13.4%3.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.531.081.12above
Match win rate40.5%46.7%48.5%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMäksäPREMIER22,261 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,170csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning67
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −7.5pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.3
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time507ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 11 Feb
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · overpass, 23 Mar
344msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 12 Sept
13–0Biggest win · warden, 21 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 90% over 10anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1710759%0.02
mirageC1771041%0.01
infernoA148657%0.05
dust2A127558%0.04
anubisD113827%-0.01
nukeB115645%0.01
overpassS109190%0.03
cacheA53260%0.09
warden110100%0.08
train1010%-0.06
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,566Lifetime kills
1.53K/D · Top 5% of Pink band
2,895Matches
40.5%Match win rate
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
9.7%Shot accuracy
6,267MVPs
1,119Hours (in match)
1,900Bombs planted
770Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,065
AWP10,278
SSG 081,363
SG 5531,252
Tec-91,061
P250964

Lifetime map wins

3,865inferno
2,528dust2
1,919nuke
1,212train
736cbble
681vertigo
125lake
48office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

303Matches
56%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
84.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3560%1.1918.5
Inferno3050%1.2614.9
Nuke3043%1.0615.4
Ancient2568%1.2417.4
Anubis1844%1.4916.6
Dust21765%1.2816.8
Overpass1547%1.1916.9
Vertigo1155%1.1915.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
6.8°Preaim
500msReaction time
52.6%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
8.81HE damage / grenade
9.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.047%18 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0114%18 Sept
dust24–100.0211%17 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0417%17 Sept
dust28–130.0821%16 Sept
inferno14–160.0213%16 Sept
ancient13–70.0516%14 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0116%14 Sept
dust213–80.0716%13 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0121%13 Sept
inferno13–50.1520%12 Sept
ancient6–130.0520%12 Sept
mirage13–90.0327%12 Sept
cache13–40.1012%12 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0229%12 Sept
ancient11–130.0013%12 Sept
mirage13–50.1423%12 Sept
dust213–40.1632%12 Sept
cache15–150.0127%7 Sept
inferno13–110.0127%7 Sept
anubis5–130.0014%7 Sept
nuke13–70.009%4 Sept
ancient13–110.0425%4 Sept
inferno11–130.0418%24 Jul
mirage5–130.0140%24 Jul
cache13–100.1526%23 Jul
cache12–120.0527%22 May
warden13–00.0835%21 May
cache13–50.1225%21 May
dust213–50.0625%27 Mar
overpass13–70.0114%27 Mar
mirage10–130.0517%27 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0611%24 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0217%24 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0911%23 Mar
inferno9–130.0222%23 Mar
dust211–130.0518%23 Mar
overpass7–00.0643%23 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0212%23 Mar
nuke12–120.0120%23 Mar
mirage13–100.1116%22 Mar
overpass13–100.0031%13 Mar
overpass13–20.0325%13 Mar
mirage10–130.0813%10 Mar
ancient13–90.118%10 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0416%6 Mar
mirage9–13-0.017%6 Mar
ancient16–130.0317%2 Mar
inferno13–90.0520%28 Feb
inferno3–130.0522%28 Feb
overpass9–130.0316%28 Feb
train12–12-0.0625%28 Feb
vertigo11–130.0513%28 Feb
anubis3–130.0226%28 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0711%26 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0018%26 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0423%25 Feb
mirage13–6-0.048%25 Feb
dust210–130.0317%25 Feb
dust213–80.0019%24 Feb
inferno13–80.0923%23 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0117%23 Feb
overpass13–30.0910%22 Feb
ancient13–50.0012%22 Feb
nuke13–50.0615%22 Feb
ancient13–70.0512%19 Feb
inferno13–20.0816%19 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0213%19 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0718%19 Feb
nuke9–130.0113%18 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0412%17 Feb
dust210–13-0.0615%13 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0423%13 Feb
anubis13–60.0229%13 Feb
ancient2–130.0117%12 Feb
inferno1–130.0319%12 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0213%12 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0223%12 Feb
nuke1–13-0.089%12 Feb
dust213–70.1122%12 Feb
ancient5–130.007%12 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0113%12 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0213%11 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0516%11 Feb
nuke16–120.0814%11 Feb
mirage11–130.0115%11 Feb
anubis9–130.0115%11 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0522%11 Feb
inferno13–10.1729%11 Feb
nuke13–6-0.047%11 Feb
dust213–9-0.0030%11 Feb
nuke13–70.0317%11 Feb
mirage13–30.0312%11 Feb
inferno13–20.1017%11 Feb
overpass13–110.0224%11 Feb
nuke7–130.0818%10 Feb
ancient13–60.0915%10 Feb
overpass13–80.074%10 Feb
dust216–14-0.0310%10 Feb
ancient10–130.1114%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →