shines

shines — CS2 Stats

FI76561198404803874[U:1:444538146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,211Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,331Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,493Top 50% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#58099 of 234681 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,144 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,211 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,493 -2,161 12 Jul20 Sept · 21 days played
21,03223,654peak 23,65412 Jul20 Sept
24,231Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,144Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,144
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 57 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,161 below peak (23,654)
  • -23 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,507 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.1%46.8%48.3%8.2% short
Shot accuracy12.3%13.0%13.2%0.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate53.7%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshinesFACEITLevel 8 · 1,144 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,493 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,144csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning50
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −7.8pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time502ms−103ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 9 Jul
43%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 20 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 17 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 13infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34132138%-0.00
ancientC146843%0.01
cacheB137654%0.02
nukeA138562%0.04
dust2A116555%0.02
anubisC94544%0.01
infernoD62433%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,241Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,917Matches
53.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players
40.1%Headshot %
12.3%Shot accuracy
8,125MVPs
1,799Hours (in match)
4,674Bombs planted
1,123Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,546
AWP7,412
P2501,196
SSG 081,162
MP9967

Lifetime map wins

7,324inferno
3,880dust2
2,693nuke
1,434train
800vertigo
247cbble
208office
51italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
76.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6552%1.1213.1
Ancient3465%1.0114.2
Nuke2966%1.3617.3
Inferno2138%0.9613.8
Anubis1839%1.1515.7
Dust21338%0.9716.5
Cache1070%1.4917.1
Vertigo875%1.1616.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
498msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.62HE damage / grenade
11.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0347% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.1020%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.0221%11 Sept
cache11–130.039%11 Sept
dust25–130.0610%11 Sept
ancient13–160.0413%2 Sept
mirage13–60.0715%2 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0314%2 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0112%1 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0623%1 Sept
cache13–80.0322%1 Sept
ancient13–30.1323%1 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0116%26 Aug
dust213–110.0116%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0516%21 Aug
ancient8–130.0628%21 Aug
cache13–80.0017%21 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0519%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0243%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0027%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0430%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0212%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0512%19 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0220%19 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0311%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0413%17 Aug
nuke13–80.0727%17 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0322%17 Aug
dust26–130.0228%17 Aug
nuke16–140.0421%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0226%16 Aug
anubis8–130.0417%14 Aug
mirage13–80.0415%14 Aug
nuke13–50.0628%14 Aug
mirage13–160.0212%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0033%13 Aug
mirage7–130.0316%13 Aug
inferno13–60.0043%13 Aug
cache11–13-0.0521%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%13 Aug
ancient13–80.0115%13 Aug
mirage7–1-0.080%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0516%13 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0315%13 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0317%12 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0319%11 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0221%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%11 Aug
nuke17–190.0523%10 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0212%9 Aug
cache4–130.0532%9 Aug
ancient13–40.1236%9 Aug
dust213–20.1339%9 Aug
mirage7–130.0325%7 Aug
mirage13–60.1014%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0726%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0223%7 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0816%28 Jul
dust212–160.0329%28 Jul
mirage12–120.0927%27 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0215%27 Jul
anubis13–50.0222%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0423%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.084%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0423%21 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0315%21 Jul
cache16–140.0224%21 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0032%21 Jul
anubis6–130.0320%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0323%20 Jul
inferno8–130.0237%20 Jul
cache13–30.0430%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0425%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0214%19 Jul
anubis13–110.0127%19 Jul
nuke4–130.0419%18 Jul
inferno4–130.0233%18 Jul
cache2–130.0428%14 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0112%13 Jul
cache13–50.0721%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.0515%13 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0119%13 Jul
nuke2–130.0230%13 Jul
cache3–130.0130%12 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0517%12 Jul
inferno8–130.0137%12 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0517%12 Jul
dust213–60.0418%12 Jul
dust216–13-0.0213%12 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0335%12 Jul
nuke8–130.0619%12 Jul
dust213–110.0022%12 Jul
mirage13–10.0915%12 Jul
ancient2–130.0210%12 Jul
anubis13–110.0424%10 Jul
dust213–4-0.0140%10 Jul
cache13–50.0728%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.075%9 Jul
cache13–90.0219%9 Jul
mirage15–150.0113%9 Jul
nuke13–70.1424%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →