โ™› | ๐‰๐จ"๐

โ™› | ๐‰๐จ"๐ โ€” CS2 Stats

IL76561198401380934[U:1:441115206]Steam profile โ†—1 game ban

487Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
732Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,457Light Blue band ยท top ~67.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,457 -934 17 Aug โ€“ 22 Oct ยท 20 days played
5,9058,885peak 8,88517 Aug22 Oct
9,439Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,428 below peak (8,885)
  • +1,552 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 โ€” 2,543 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,367), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate40.8%40.9%41.3%meets
Shot accuracy14.1%14.2%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.180.950.95above
Match win rate49.2%42.1%42.6%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 2 player. Rank still comes from winning matches โ€” this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGโ™› | ๐‰๐จ"๐FACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER7,457 ยท Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning67
Utility48

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45โ€“52โ€“3Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.02 avg rating ยท +5.5pp headshot accuracy ยท +9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“4 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 711ms

Last 10

  • 4โ€“6 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 706ms

Last 20

  • 10โ€“10 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 702ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success โ€” entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 49% on CT โ€” first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.02
Reaction time671ms+22ms
first โ…“ avg 650ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 671ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+3.5%
first โ…“ avg 14.3% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating ยท 9โ€“2 ยท eldorado, 21 Oct โ†’
75%Best headshot accuracy ยท 1โ€“10 ยท cache, 9 Sept โ†’
422msFastest reaction time ยท 5โ€“9 ยท eldorado, 19 Oct โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท mirage, 1 Oct โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
7โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map ยท 60% over 5mirageWeakest map ยท 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
eldoradoB2814โ€“1450%0.02
dust2B157โ€“847%0.01
nukeC156โ€“940%0.02
infernoA116โ€“555%0.01
mirageD81โ€“713%0.01
cacheB84โ€“450%-0.01
ancientB63โ€“350%0.03
anubisA53โ€“260%0.02
vertigoโ€”20โ€“20%-0.02
debrisโ€”11โ€“0100%0.09
overpassโ€”10โ€“10%-0.28

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,943Lifetime kills
1.18K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 1 players
999Matches
49.2%Match win rate ยท Top 10% of Level 1 players
40.8%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy
4,119MVPs
378Hours (in match)
918Bombs planted
526Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,840inferno
1,271nuke
674dust2
549vertigo
490train
164cbble
38lake
31office

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
10.8ยฐPreaim
668msReaction time
67.2%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.58HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads โ€” usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.5098% โ€” below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training โ†’
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy โ†’Mirage grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24โ€“13-0.0322%22 Oct โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.0017%22 Oct โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.0024%22 Oct โ†’
inferno4โ€“130.0412%22 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“70.0624%22 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“30.1217%22 Oct โ†’
eldorado1โ€“7-0.0750%21 Oct โ†’
eldorado4โ€“9-0.0517%21 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“60.0913%21 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“30.1123%21 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“20.3621%21 Oct โ†’
eldorado7โ€“90.0217%20 Oct โ†’
mirage5โ€“130.0127%20 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0316%20 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0814%20 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0014%20 Oct โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.063%20 Oct โ†’
debris9โ€“40.0913%20 Oct โ†’
eldorado7โ€“9-0.0912%20 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“50.0325%20 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0715%19 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.069%19 Oct โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0621%19 Oct โ†’
eldorado5โ€“9-0.1413%19 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“60.1226%19 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“10.0726%18 Oct โ†’
eldorado4โ€“9-0.145%18 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“30.079%18 Oct โ†’
eldorado5โ€“9-0.0717%18 Oct โ†’
eldorado6โ€“90.0820%18 Oct โ†’
overpass0โ€“9-0.288%18 Oct โ†’
eldorado8โ€“8-0.0516%18 Oct โ†’
cache16โ€“130.0322%18 Oct โ†’
ancient12โ€“160.039%18 Oct โ†’
inferno7โ€“130.0523%17 Oct โ†’
nuke16โ€“140.057%16 Oct โ†’
nuke2โ€“13-0.0311%16 Oct โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.039%16 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“50.2111%16 Oct โ†’
eldorado9โ€“4-0.0613%16 Oct โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0010%3 Oct โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0115%3 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.019%3 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.049%3 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0119%3 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“3-0.0117%1 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“1-0.0016%1 Oct โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0516%30 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“110.037%30 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0213%30 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“160.0615%30 Sept โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0622%28 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“5-0.0215%28 Sept โ†’
nuke10โ€“130.0424%27 Sept โ†’
eldorado4โ€“9-0.029%26 Sept โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0420%26 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“7-0.0023%26 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“40.108%26 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0213%26 Sept โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.1020%25 Sept โ†’
cache0โ€“13-0.0526%25 Sept โ†’
eldorado8โ€“80.0817%25 Sept โ†’
cache1โ€“10-0.0875%9 Sept โ†’
dust22โ€“11-0.0212%9 Sept โ†’
vertigo4โ€“9-0.0927%9 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“8-0.0220%9 Sept โ†’
nuke4โ€“9-0.067%9 Sept โ†’
eldorado1โ€“9-0.1414%9 Sept โ†’
eldorado1โ€“9-0.186%9 Sept โ†’
eldorado9โ€“50.0220%6 Sept โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0514%5 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0118%5 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0213%5 Sept โ†’
vertigo4โ€“90.0621%5 Sept โ†’
eldorado9โ€“40.1329%5 Sept โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.0210%5 Sept โ†’
cache7โ€“13-0.078%4 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0515%4 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“20.0515%4 Sept โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.034%21 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0210%21 Aug โ†’
dust214โ€“160.0817%21 Aug โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.027%20 Aug โ†’
eldorado2โ€“9-0.1414%20 Aug โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0520%18 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0122%18 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“30.0616%18 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0213%18 Aug โ†’
eldorado9โ€“30.189%18 Aug โ†’
nuke16โ€“14-0.026%18 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0014%18 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“140.0911%18 Aug โ†’
ancient9โ€“130.0316%18 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0919%18 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.0621%17 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“10.0410%17 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0722%17 Aug โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.089%17 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0111%17 Aug โ†’
nuke10โ€“50.1717%17 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.