Senso

Senso — CS2 Stats

DK76561198400708333[U:1:440442605]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,154Tracked matches36%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,222Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#26939 of 257783 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,590 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,576 +5,548 19 Jun – 11 Sept · 8 days played
17,93324,576peak 24,57619 Jun11 Sept
24,576Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,590Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2025-06-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,590
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 161 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.6%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy11.5%13.0%13.2%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.801.061.070.27 short
Match win rate45.0%46.3%46.9%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSensoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,590 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,590csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning67
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLTLWLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 20

  • 4–14–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.7
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time644ms+71ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–4 · overpass, 14 Jul →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 6 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 18 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 13 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
14–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2411–1346%0.01
overpassB2010–1050%-0.00
nukeC145–936%0.01
mirageB115–645%-0.01
trainA106–460%-0.01
anubisB84–450%-0.02
dust2D62–433%0.00
jura—32–167%-0.00
italy—22–0100%0.05
inferno—20–20%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,308Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
4,372Matches
45.0%Match win rate
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11.5%Shot accuracy
13,924MVPs
2,222Hours (in match)
3,873Bombs planted
1,383Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,364
AWP6,019
Knife5,918
MP91,546
MAC-101,517

Lifetime map wins

5,159inferno
4,776vertigo
3,590nuke
2,975dust2
816train
481cbble
89lake
72office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

596Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
71.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8148%1.0915.0
Anubis5654%1.0514.3
Mirage4042%0.9913.3
Vertigo3762%1.1615.7
Nuke2352%1.0212.5
Overpass2157%1.0215.5
Train1867%1.1315.7
Inferno1225%1.0917.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
638msReaction time
43.7%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.60HE damage / grenade
10.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0224%1 Oct →
overpass15–150.0128%10 Feb →
nuke7–130.0533%10 Feb →
ancient13–100.0826%10 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0614%10 Feb →
nuke11–130.0121%10 Feb →
ancient15–150.0121%9 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0311%9 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0426%17 Nov →
ancient11–130.0119%17 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0125%17 Nov →
ancient7–130.0128%17 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0032%13 Nov →
overpass6–13-0.0124%10 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0632%10 Nov →
train8–13-0.0323%10 Nov →
overpass13–110.0521%5 Nov →
overpass13–70.0417%5 Nov →
nuke9–13-0.0410%5 Nov →
overpass4–13-0.0321%3 Nov →
nuke9–70.0525%3 Nov →
train12–16-0.0218%29 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0111%29 Oct →
train13–30.0218%27 Oct →
train13–9-0.0314%27 Oct →
nuke14–160.0224%17 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0220%11 Sept →
dust213–60.0715%21 Aug →
nuke11–130.0017%13 Aug →
ancient13–00.1217%13 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.029%11 Aug →
ancient5–130.0012%8 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0022%7 Aug →
italy13–100.0638%7 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0113%7 Aug →
ancient11–130.0121%7 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0745%6 Aug →
mirage13–110.0115%6 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0329%6 Aug →
overpass13–110.0111%6 Aug →
ancient9–130.0617%6 Aug →
overpass9–13-0.1312%6 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0111%6 Aug →
jura13–90.0716%31 Jul →
italy13–80.0425%31 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0129%31 Jul →
jura7–13-0.0324%30 Jul →
jura13–11-0.0417%30 Jul →
train1–13-0.036%30 Jul →
nuke14–16-0.0315%30 Jul →
overpass13–20.0226%24 Jul →
overpass13–90.0519%21 Jul →
overpass4–13-0.0420%21 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0325%21 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0125%20 Jul →
train13–11-0.0320%20 Jul →
overpass14–160.008%20 Jul →
overpass22–19-0.0017%19 Jul →
mirage16–19-0.0414%18 Jul →
overpass7–13-0.026%18 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0415%18 Jul →
nuke8–130.0017%17 Jul →
overpass10–13-0.0515%17 Jul →
ancient13–20.0123%17 Jul →
overpass11–130.0713%17 Jul →
ancient13–20.076%16 Jul →
overpass13–110.0024%16 Jul →
ancient13–30.0226%16 Jul →
overpass9–40.1521%14 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0628%10 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0322%7 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0023%3 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0722%3 Jul →
train13–40.0821%2 Jul →
nuke13–40.1126%2 Jul →
dust213–160.1012%2 Jul →
ancient13–90.0518%2 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0616%2 Jul →
anubis13–110.0212%2 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0315%27 Jun →
anubis11–130.0016%27 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0313%26 Jun →
train13–11-0.0013%25 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0123%25 Jun →
ancient13–30.0132%25 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.1013%24 Jun →
anubis13–50.028%24 Jun →
overpass7–9-0.1015%23 Jun →
train13–110.0127%23 Jun →
dust219–17-0.0520%23 Jun →
mirage13–40.0120%22 Jun →
ancient13–100.0321%22 Jun →
mirage11–130.0130%22 Jun →
ancient13–40.0321%22 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0224%19 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0127%19 Jun →
train5–13-0.0420%19 Jun →
mirage5–130.0433%19 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0224%18 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.050%18 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.