Defend3R

Defend3R — CS2 Stats

DK76561198278173449[U:1:317907721]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

984Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,812Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,680 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 984 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,522 -1,180 9 Sept – 15 Dec · 15 days played
16,61419,702peak 19,7029 Sept15 Dec
19,702Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,680Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2025-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,680
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 71 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.0%46.8%48.2%2.2% short
Shot accuracy17.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.13 short
Match win rate36.0%46.3%46.9%10.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDefend3RFACEITLevel 8 · 1,680 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,680csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning65
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLLWLLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 1–8–1 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time615ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 20 Apr →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 21 Oct →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 22 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 20 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB209–1145%0.01
ancientC198–1142%-0.02
mirageC188–1044%0.03
trainB126–650%0.02
overpassA106–460%0.03
anubisC73–443%0.02
infernoD62–433%-0.00
dust2C52–340%0.06
cache—10–10%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
cbble_csgo—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

146,381Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
5,923Matches
36.0%Match win rate
46.0%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15,331MVPs
4,116Hours (in match)
4,676Bombs planted
1,926Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,160
AWP24,979
SG 5533,089
AUG2,908
Knife2,406
FAMAS2,066

Lifetime map wins

9,445inferno
5,208vertigo
4,537dust2
3,070nuke
2,586train
587cbble
120lake
84safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

882Matches
50%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
76.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11251%1.0314.7
Mirage6138%1.1115.5
Anubis6052%1.1616.7
Nuke4048%1.1814.5
Train3959%1.1718.0
Overpass3444%1.1517.9
Vertigo3161%1.6416.4
Inferno2631%1.1415.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
620msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
12.77HE damage / grenade
7.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1696% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–130.1522%31 May →
nuke6–130.0124%25 May →
ancient16–13-0.0215%25 May →
overpass10–13-0.0420%25 May →
ancient4–13-0.0616%20 May →
inferno12–16-0.0323%4 May →
cache7–13-0.0226%1 May →
inferno9–130.0429%27 Apr →
mirage8–130.0115%26 Apr →
vertigo12–12-0.0132%26 Apr →
ancient10–130.0525%22 Apr →
overpass9–60.1118%21 Apr →
inferno7–9-0.0423%21 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0417%21 Apr →
dust213–100.0330%20 Apr →
mirage13–00.1920%20 Apr →
inferno13–40.0126%19 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0117%19 Apr →
dust211–130.1226%19 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0910%15 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0421%15 Apr →
ancient12–16-0.0516%15 Apr →
nuke16–13-0.0819%13 Apr →
dust212–120.1844%12 Apr →
anubis8–130.0621%12 Apr →
inferno13–80.1018%12 Apr →
mirage13–80.0911%12 Apr →
mirage16–14-0.0125%6 Apr →
nuke7–130.0517%6 Apr →
nuke12–120.0413%6 Apr →
nuke12–120.0814%6 Apr →
mirage12–120.0627%6 Apr →
nuke9–130.0625%6 Apr →
mirage7–130.0411%30 Mar →
mirage13–40.0526%30 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0217%26 Mar →
nuke13–00.1011%26 Mar →
nuke13–40.0324%23 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0517%23 Mar →
anubis13–30.0123%20 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0128%19 Mar →
anubis13–80.0122%19 Mar →
overpass13–100.0230%19 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0018%19 Mar →
nuke16–120.0123%16 Mar →
nuke13–70.0120%16 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0314%16 Mar →
ancient13–20.0517%16 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0013%11 Mar →
overpass13–40.0125%4 Mar →
mirage19–160.0120%2 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0133%25 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0723%5 Feb →
overpass11–13-0.0313%5 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0444%5 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0125%18 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0312%15 Jan →
ancient13–100.0318%15 Jan →
anubis13–90.0113%15 Jan →
nuke13–80.0915%22 Dec →
train13–11-0.0027%22 Dec →
mirage6–130.0218%22 Dec →
overpass11–130.0316%17 Dec →
overpass22–180.0119%16 Dec →
nuke13–9-0.0518%15 Dec →
mirage9–130.0536%15 Dec →
train9–13-0.0139%4 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.0427%3 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.048%26 Nov →
nuke16–130.0319%24 Nov →
dust213–50.0013%22 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0133%13 Nov →
overpass4–13-0.0310%3 Nov →
mirage13–100.0627%30 Oct →
train12–160.037%29 Oct →
overpass13–110.0311%29 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.069%29 Oct →
mirage13–100.0633%29 Oct →
train13–100.0920%28 Oct →
train13–50.0721%28 Oct →
train13–30.0818%27 Oct →
train13–90.0316%27 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0038%27 Oct →
train6–10.0229%27 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0117%26 Oct →
mirage13–100.0321%26 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0631%25 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0446%21 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.045%21 Oct →
train9–130.0110%21 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0411%17 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0216%17 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0115%16 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0036%11 Sept →
cbble_csgo13–50.1315%11 Sept →
overpass13–00.1524%9 Sept →
train4–13-0.0123%2 Sept →
train5–13-0.0714%2 Sept →
train8–130.0120%1 Sept →
nuke11–130.0117%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.