Poulet

Poulet — CS2 Stats

76561198397274549[U:1:437008821]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,231Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,895Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,081 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,081 → 2,081
+5Tracked matches · now 1,231
−3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 28 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,860 +1,303 28 Jun20 Jul · 12 days played
20,00522,932peak 22,93228 Jun20 Jul
23,322Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,081Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-06-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,081
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 419 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches5
Win rate20%
K/D0.85
Headshot %35%

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.9%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy12.1%13.2%13.7%1.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.08 short
Match win rate51.4%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPouletFACEITLevel 9 · 2,081 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,081csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning45
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −8.1pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.05), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility3.9
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.5
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time605ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy30.3%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 30.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 9 Jul
60%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 16 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 17 Aug
12–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB20101050%-0.01
infernoA2011955%0.02
anubisD1961332%-0.01
nukeA1610663%0.03
dust2D1541127%-0.01
ancient31233%0.00
mirage21150%0.04
overpass220100%0.03
debris110100%0.14
vertigo1010%-0.04
poseidon1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,364Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,483Matches
51.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
53.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
12.1%Shot accuracy
9,997MVPs
1,816Hours (in match)
1,384Bombs planted
615Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,793inferno
4,384dust2
3,331nuke
2,331vertigo
1,495militia
596cbble
399train
164office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

591Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
74.4ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7951%0.9415.8
Mirage6849%0.9815.0
Inferno6653%0.9916.3
Nuke5768%1.0716.4
Vertigo4760%0.9716.1
Dust23743%0.9014.1
Ancient2236%0.8313.6
Overpass1486%1.4319.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
581msReaction time
41.3%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.94HE damage / grenade
5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4513 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.5335% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0414%11 Sept
dust27–13-0.0421%6 Sept
nuke13–70.0428%30 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0223%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0629%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0530%28 Aug
dust213–110.0026%27 Aug
cache13–9-0.0431%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0121%24 Aug
anubis16–14-0.1213%24 Aug
inferno13–30.0647%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0027%22 Aug
cache13–6-0.0216%19 Aug
nuke8–130.0224%17 Aug
anubis7–130.0028%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0627%25 Jul
inferno9–50.2038%25 Jul
anubis4–130.0318%24 Jul
dust23–130.0256%24 Jul
cache8–13-0.0134%24 Jul
cache6–13-0.0725%20 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0335%20 Jul
nuke11–130.0332%19 Jul
inferno13–70.0118%19 Jul
cache13–50.0633%19 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0532%18 Jul
debris9–30.1436%16 Jul
dust25–13-0.0330%16 Jul
cache6–13-0.0631%16 Jul
cache13–11-0.0229%16 Jul
inferno5–90.0542%16 Jul
inferno9–40.0545%16 Jul
cache6–130.0060%16 Jul
nuke11–130.0045%15 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0515%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0322%14 Jul
inferno8–130.0327%14 Jul
inferno11–130.0327%13 Jul
nuke13–110.0314%13 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0126%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0220%12 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0330%12 Jul
ancient3–130.0028%12 Jul
dust215–15-0.0024%12 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0340%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0115%12 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0233%12 Jul
anubis4–130.0129%12 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0232%11 Jul
dust213–80.0733%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0317%11 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0129%11 Jul
anubis13–90.0445%11 Jul
anubis13–100.0341%11 Jul
nuke13–60.0721%11 Jul
cache11–50.0129%11 Jul
dust214–16-0.0330%11 Jul
nuke8–80.0632%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0521%10 Jul
inferno13–40.0833%10 Jul
cache13–70.0133%10 Jul
anubis9–130.0324%10 Jul
cache15–150.0224%10 Jul
nuke9–30.0820%10 Jul
vertigo6–9-0.0438%10 Jul
nuke9–60.2426%9 Jul
dust24–13-0.0511%9 Jul
mirage16–130.0827%9 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0521%9 Jul
cache13–110.0614%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0320%9 Jul
dust215–15-0.0217%9 Jul
dust212–10.0112%9 Jul
cache3–13-0.0433%9 Jul
inferno14–160.0529%8 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1029%8 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0314%8 Jul
anubis10–130.0222%7 Jul
cache13–10-0.0232%7 Jul
cache13–4-0.0132%7 Jul
overpass13–50.0731%6 Jul
mirage9–130.0139%5 Jul
nuke13–100.0521%5 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0620%5 Jul
nuke13–50.0344%5 Jul
overpass13–80.0026%5 Jul
dust213–80.0033%5 Jul
poseidon6–90.0634%5 Jul
dust26–13-0.0355%4 Jul
inferno13–100.0144%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0147%3 Jul
anubis10–130.0322%3 Jul
dust28–13-0.0614%1 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0229%30 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0522%30 Jun
ancient16–120.0236%28 Jun
dust212–16-0.0222%28 Jun
cache8–13-0.0123%28 Jun
cache13–70.0027%28 Jun
anubis10–130.0331%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →