Pepa julien

Pepa julien — CS2 Stats

FR76561198395944548[U:1:435678820]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

578Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,644Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,876 +1,189 21 Dec – 13 Jun · 11 days played
13,52516,586peak 16,58621 Dec13 Jun
16,586Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2025-12-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches6——
Win rate17%——
K/D0.51——
Headshot %35%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,989), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate33.2%42.7%43.8%10.5% short
Shot accuracy9.6%11.3%12.0%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.890.991.020.13 short
Match win rate29.0%43.9%44.7%15.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPepa julienFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning53
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–50–7Last 10043%Win rateTWLLLTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility3.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.3
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time596ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy10.5%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · office, 16 Jul →
25%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 3 May →
461msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · office, 13 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 3 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 13anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D217–1433%-0.01
infernoC146–843%-0.01
nukeB147–750%0.01
cacheB137–654%0.00
ancientD124–833%-0.02
mirageB126–650%-0.01
anubisD72–529%0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.04
office—21–150%0.03
train—22–0100%-0.02
fachwerk—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,991Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
3,151Matches
29.0%Match win rate
33.2%Headshot %
9.6%Shot accuracy
5,900MVPs
845Hours (in match)
2,199Bombs planted
389Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP15,041
AK-4714,597
SSG 082,106
P901,701
MP71,564
XM10141,468

Lifetime map wins

2,902dust2
2,460inferno
1,388nuke
1,026vertigo
498office
456train
269lake
189cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
40%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
70.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.9712.3
Dust2333%0.669.0
Ancient250%0.9416.0
Anubis10%0.9313.0
Inferno1100%1.3320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.5%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
601msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
3.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.4902% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4423 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2336% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–12-0.0811%23 Sept →
dust213–9-0.057%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0610%5 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0512%22 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.038%16 Aug →
ancient15–150.0411%15 Aug →
mirage13–90.0311%11 Aug →
cache13–90.0118%31 Jul →
cache11–130.088%22 Jul →
cache13–10-0.022%20 Jul →
nuke13–40.079%20 Jul →
ancient7–130.015%20 Jul →
vertigo13–30.066%20 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0516%20 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.026%20 Jul →
mirage13–110.029%20 Jul →
fachwerk5–13-0.0812%19 Jul →
vertigo0–130.016%19 Jul →
office13–50.149%16 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0314%16 Jul →
nuke9–130.043%16 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0211%15 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.013%15 Jul →
anubis13–70.0513%15 Jul →
office1–13-0.0719%13 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0316%12 Jul →
dust29–130.0320%12 Jul →
nuke13–90.1014%8 Jul →
inferno11–130.0218%3 Jul →
cache9–130.026%14 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0411%13 Jun →
ancient13–50.0112%12 Jun →
nuke10–130.0211%12 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0119%12 Jun →
inferno13–30.045%10 Jun →
dust212–120.0012%10 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0110%9 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0522%8 Jun →
dust210–130.0510%6 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0216%25 May →
cache13–7-0.0314%13 May →
nuke10–13-0.0317%13 May →
ancient5–13-0.0613%11 May →
mirage13–7-0.0219%10 May →
ancient9–13-0.049%10 May →
anubis14–160.0410%8 May →
inferno4–13-0.0217%8 May →
nuke13–90.0412%3 May →
cache13–60.0225%3 May →
cache13–10.0714%3 May →
cache11–130.0014%2 May →
cache13–30.0218%2 May →
cache13–11-0.0220%1 May →
cache10–13-0.0410%1 May →
cache11–13-0.0011%1 May →
mirage10–130.0810%28 Apr →
dust212–120.0313%27 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0112%26 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.084%26 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0513%26 Apr →
inferno13–50.0314%26 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.048%26 Apr →
ancient13–50.0113%26 Apr →
nuke9–60.0311%25 Apr →
inferno9–50.0814%25 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0615%24 Apr →
anubis13–90.0110%24 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.025%24 Apr →
inferno15–150.0119%12 Apr →
mirage13–100.0112%12 Apr →
mirage2–12-0.0114%30 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.058%27 Mar →
nuke10–130.017%27 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.017%27 Mar →
dust27–130.0120%27 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0210%26 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0417%24 Mar →
anubis12–120.0112%22 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0312%15 Mar →
ancient13–70.024%15 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0612%13 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0711%13 Mar →
dust213–90.0315%2 Mar →
dust29–4-0.0317%26 Feb →
dust213–7-0.048%20 Feb →
dust215–150.0111%12 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0110%12 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0419%11 Feb →
dust21–12-0.0510%11 Feb →
inferno13–60.0425%23 Jan →
dust213–80.0316%28 Dec →
dust211–130.0019%28 Dec →
inferno7–9-0.110%25 Dec →
ancient8–13-0.1112%25 Dec →
dust213–80.008%25 Dec →
dust22–13-0.104%24 Dec →
train13–9-0.0514%24 Dec →
train13–110.0116%21 Dec →
dust213–60.0313%21 Dec →
dust28–130.0714%20 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.