Blacky

Blacky — CS2 Stats

BR76561198386281413[U:1:426015685]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

278Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
576Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#83434 of 261499 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 278
−4.9ppWin rate · 62.1% → 57.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,039 +941 22 Aug – 1 Nov · 26 days played
18,39020,679peak 20,67922 Aug1 Nov
20,777Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.0%43.8%44.8%1.8% short
Shot accuracy7.8%12.0%12.4%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.791.021.030.24 short
Match win rate44.8%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlackyFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning68
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWLWTLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.0
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time556ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 7 Nov →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · dust2, 17 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 6 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 37anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3723–1462%-0.00
dust2B2411–1346%-0.00
infernoB2111–1052%0.00
anubisC114–736%0.02
ancient—42–250%0.00
cache—21–150%0.00
nuke—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,480Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
1,475Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
43.0%Headshot %
7.8%Shot accuracy
2,355MVPs
576Hours (in match)
1,667Bombs planted
350Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,583inferno
2,910dust2
209nuke
197vertigo
85train
9assault
8italy
8office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

40Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%0.9915.7
Inferno944%0.8210.9
Anubis667%1.5018.8
Dust2475%1.3619.8
Ancient425%0.7710.3
Nuke333%1.4214.3
Overpass1100%1.7017.0
Cache10%0.5511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
554msReaction time
63.8%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.90HE damage / grenade
11.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–20.0019%8 Nov →
mirage9–130.0919%8 Nov →
dust213–20.1217%7 Nov →
mirage12–12-0.0411%7 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0020%7 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0017%6 Nov →
inferno4–130.0029%4 Nov →
dust213–60.0532%1 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0221%29 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0216%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0016%18 Oct →
dust29–130.0616%18 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0724%18 Oct →
mirage10–4-0.0421%17 Oct →
inferno15–150.0521%16 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0420%12 Oct →
dust213–60.0125%12 Oct →
dust213–90.0624%12 Oct →
mirage13–80.0413%12 Oct →
dust210–130.0122%12 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0036%10 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0625%10 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0416%10 Oct →
ancient13–80.0421%9 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0313%8 Oct →
anubis5–130.0625%8 Oct →
cache13–80.0325%4 Oct →
inferno13–60.0328%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0023%4 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0219%4 Oct →
anubis13–30.0118%4 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0214%4 Oct →
mirage13–80.0932%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0319%3 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0315%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0021%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0411%20 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0117%20 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0210%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0018%20 Sept →
dust25–13-0.046%20 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.1017%19 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.040%19 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0219%19 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.016%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0210%17 Sept →
dust20–3-0.10100%17 Sept →
inferno11–130.0529%17 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0319%17 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0229%13 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0416%12 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0221%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0317%12 Sept →
anubis13–60.0625%11 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0424%11 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0126%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.0727%10 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0511%9 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0522%9 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0323%7 Sept →
mirage13–110.0425%7 Sept →
inferno13–20.0626%7 Sept →
inferno14–160.0121%6 Sept →
anubis6–130.0427%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0617%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0424%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.0036%6 Sept →
mirage8–130.0416%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0815%6 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0725%6 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0115%5 Sept →
mirage13–40.0122%5 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0327%5 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0114%4 Sept →
anubis15–150.0219%4 Sept →
ancient4–130.0410%3 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0219%3 Sept →
mirage13–110.0418%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.0741%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.0313%2 Sept →
inferno13–110.0616%31 Aug →
mirage13–20.0617%31 Aug →
anubis13–70.0835%29 Aug →
inferno13–80.0121%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0322%29 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0113%29 Aug →
inferno10–130.0517%29 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0418%29 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0123%29 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0226%29 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0329%28 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0320%28 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0212%28 Aug →
anubis9–130.0122%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0421%26 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0022%25 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0221%25 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0124%24 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.140%22 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0223%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.