B4mIt

B4mIt — CS2 Stats

HM76561198381195353[U:1:420929625]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,146Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,566Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19451 of 226715 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,921 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 19 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +2,423 19 Jun18 Sept · 27 days played
21,58325,113peak 25,11319 Jun18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,921 +0 6 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,9211,921peak 1,9216 Sept18 Sept
25,113Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,921Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-06-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,921
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 113 below peak (25,113)
  • +680 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,299 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate44.0%48.3%51.0%7.0% short
Shot accuracy14.4%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.071.09above
Match win rate47.8%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGB4mItFACEITLevel 9 · 1,921 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,921csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning57
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY414910Last 10041%Win rateLWLTLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time629ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 14 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 29 Jul
461msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · ancient, 26 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 4 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C41172441%0.01
infernoC1971237%-0.02
ancientC1981142%-0.01
anubisD8080%0.00
cacheS54180%0.04
nukeS54180%0.04
mirage21150%0.02
office1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

135,224Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6,429Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
44.0%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17,573MVPs
2,566Hours (in match)
6,601Bombs planted
1,735Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,795
AWP18,121
FAMAS2,922
MAC-102,490
MP92,207

Lifetime map wins

26,330dust2
6,274inferno
6,162vertigo
4,984train
2,620nuke
418office
309lake
111cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

407Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7664%1.1017.4
Anubis7453%1.2517.6
Vertigo5155%1.1617.8
Dust24048%0.9315.3
Inferno3946%1.1215.7
Mirage3751%1.0515.8
Nuke933%0.9415.9
Overpass743%1.1717.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
616msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
11.45HE damage / grenade
4.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4848% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–130.0246%14 Sept
dust213–40.2218%14 Sept
inferno4–13-0.049%13 Sept
dust212–120.0120%12 Sept
dust22–90.0217%12 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0435%1 Sept
cache13–7-0.0016%1 Sept
dust213–80.0024%1 Sept
office2–13-0.0417%28 Aug
dust26–13-0.0314%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0131%28 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0123%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0129%26 Aug
cache13–100.0619%19 Aug
dust213–90.0230%16 Aug
dust213–80.0531%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.049%6 Aug
dust213–60.0017%5 Aug
nuke13–100.1017%3 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0618%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0116%30 Jul
dust21–13-0.0350%29 Jul
dust29–130.0124%29 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0515%29 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0211%29 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0116%29 Jul
dust213–8-0.0413%29 Jul
dust22–13-0.0518%28 Jul
dust213–100.1115%28 Jul
inferno13–80.0211%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0821%25 Jul
anubis0–13-0.0210%25 Jul
inferno8–00.0421%25 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0415%25 Jul
anubis12–120.0330%25 Jul
anubis12–120.0213%25 Jul
nuke13–80.026%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.038%25 Jul
cache11–130.0114%24 Jul
dust29–13-0.0319%24 Jul
nuke13–90.0822%24 Jul
dust21–13-0.0725%24 Jul
cache13–8-0.019%24 Jul
cache13–70.1616%23 Jul
inferno4–130.0317%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.037%23 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0219%21 Jul
dust213–8-0.0217%18 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0833%17 Jul
ancient13–80.0629%17 Jul
anubis6–130.0111%17 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0721%17 Jul
nuke13–90.0317%17 Jul
ancient16–120.0216%17 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0615%16 Jul
dust27–130.0419%16 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0121%16 Jul
ancient9–130.0527%16 Jul
dust213–100.0122%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0529%15 Jul
inferno15–150.0217%12 Jul
dust216–130.0616%12 Jul
ancient5–130.0127%11 Jul
dust23–13-0.0415%11 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0927%11 Jul
dust213–60.0222%11 Jul
dust214–16-0.0318%11 Jul
dust210–130.0232%11 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0321%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0021%11 Jul
inferno13–110.0231%11 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0327%10 Jul
dust213–80.0626%10 Jul
dust213–100.0020%10 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0427%5 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0033%5 Jul
anubis15–150.0313%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0729%4 Jul
dust213–1-0.0442%4 Jul
dust214–160.0521%4 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0635%4 Jul
dust27–130.0924%3 Jul
dust213–60.069%3 Jul
dust215–150.0331%3 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0412%29 Jun
dust210–13-0.0321%29 Jun
dust215–150.0313%29 Jun
inferno13–70.0435%26 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0419%26 Jun
dust28–13-0.0924%26 Jun
ancient13–50.0420%26 Jun
anubis7–130.0328%26 Jun
ancient13–70.0312%24 Jun
dust27–130.0125%24 Jun
dust213–7-0.0316%20 Jun
dust29–13-0.0512%19 Jun
dust212–12-0.0019%19 Jun
ancient1–6-0.080%19 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0330%19 Jun
inferno13–70.0130%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →