Peter Pantburk

Peter Pantburk — CS2 Stats

EH76561198375160534[U:1:414894806]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

110Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
860Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,500Blue band · top ~46.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 110 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,500 +3,662 19 Nov – 2 Nov · 42 days played
7,83815,000peak 15,00019 Nov2 Nov
15,116Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2021-05-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,500 below peak (15,000)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,500 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.5%43.8%44.8%4.3% short
Shot accuracy18.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.021.03above
Match win rate41.9%44.7%45.2%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPeter PantburkFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,500 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning46
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT41–51–4Last 9643%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 96 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 96 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 5–9 · inferno, 13 Mar →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 18 Feb →
406msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 13 Mar →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 22 Dec →

Across the last 96 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 54% over 26dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2614–1254%-0.00
infernoC229–1341%0.00
overpassC166–1038%-0.00
nukeC145–936%-0.01
dust2D124–833%-0.01
ancient—42–250%0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.03

Across the last 96 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,528Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,302Matches
41.9%Match win rate
40.5%Headshot %
18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players
9,413MVPs
860Hours (in match)
2,037Bombs planted
407Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,414
AWP8,693
SSG 081,444
P2501,324
Knife637

Lifetime map wins

1,892inferno
1,294dust2
1,228nuke
999vertigo
441train
287cbble
119office
111lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
81.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage683%1.2615.7
Overpass3100%1.7920.3
Dust220%0.9714.0
Nuke250%0.8415.0
Inferno10%1.4423.0
Ancient1100%0.7014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
596msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.18HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3069% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0318%29 Mar →
inferno9–30.0224%29 Mar →
overpass13–100.0321%24 Mar →
dust26–130.0130%24 Mar →
inferno11–130.0417%23 Mar →
overpass13–70.0211%23 Mar →
ancient13–70.1114%19 Mar →
ancient16–12-0.0415%18 Mar →
mirage13–70.0737%18 Mar →
overpass13–90.0525%18 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0430%18 Mar →
inferno9–130.0534%17 Mar →
mirage16–130.0716%17 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0521%16 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0315%16 Mar →
overpass10–130.0935%14 Mar →
inferno8–130.1225%14 Mar →
inferno5–90.1335%13 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.1713%13 Mar →
inferno4–9-0.017%13 Mar →
dust22–13-0.0214%13 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0223%9 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0524%4 Mar →
dust24–13-0.119%4 Mar →
mirage5–10.0318%4 Mar →
overpass13–100.1115%4 Mar →
nuke13–70.0120%4 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0024%3 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0024%3 Mar →
nuke13–16-0.0318%2 Mar →
dust213–90.0124%2 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.119%2 Mar →
dust213–60.0531%2 Mar →
dust213–100.0210%1 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0120%1 Mar →
overpass5–13-0.0133%1 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0220%1 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0313%28 Feb →
nuke13–40.0325%28 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0115%27 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0421%27 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0325%27 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0524%20 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0231%18 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0122%18 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0141%18 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0413%16 Feb →
nuke15–15-0.0121%4 Feb →
inferno10–130.0124%4 Feb →
overpass10–130.0626%3 Feb →
mirage9–130.0426%27 Jan →
overpass16–14-0.0214%18 Jan →
dust25–130.038%16 Jan →
mirage13–70.0615%14 Jan →
overpass15–150.046%10 Jan →
inferno13–40.0326%10 Jan →
mirage6–130.0113%5 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.036%1 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0510%1 Jan →
inferno13–8-0.0421%29 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0530%26 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0434%26 Dec →
dust21–13-0.0714%26 Dec →
overpass7–13-0.0522%17 Dec →
mirage13–80.0420%16 Dec →
nuke13–30.0124%16 Dec →
nuke9–13-0.0710%15 Dec →
inferno13–7-0.0523%14 Dec →
overpass7–13-0.0515%11 Dec →
mirage15–15-0.0319%9 Dec →
mirage15–15-0.0323%9 Dec →
dust213–40.0114%8 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0321%8 Dec →
nuke3–13-0.0119%20 Sept →
inferno12–30.0730%20 Sept →
inferno13–50.0921%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0720%14 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.0719%23 Dec →
overpass13–3-0.0112%23 Dec →
mirage13–100.0217%23 Dec →
vertigo13–60.0115%23 Dec →
mirage13–20.0719%22 Dec →
inferno13–40.0541%21 Dec →
overpass3–13-0.0839%21 Dec →
mirage13–50.1012%20 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0415%20 Dec →
nuke13–20.039%19 Dec →
overpass2–13-0.1016%14 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.066%14 Dec →
mirage13–11-0.0117%13 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.0614%11 Dec →
vertigo3–13-0.0828%10 Dec →
overpass6–13-0.0517%19 Nov →
mirage0–16-0.109%26 Dec →
nuke5–160.008%11 May →
inferno16–130.0021%10 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.