Polo_4_life

Polo_4_life — CS2 Stats

76561198374254321[U:1:413988593]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

713Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,810Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,897Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75813 of 221266 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 713 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 19 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,897 +5,246 19 Apr8 Sept · 41 days played
10,47019,999peak 19,99919 Apr8 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-04-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 102 below peak (19,999)
  • +262 over 30 days · steady
  • +9,113 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 103 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate36.1%42.7%43.8%7.7% short
Shot accuracy9.7%11.2%12.0%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.740.991.020.28 short
Match win rate41.4%43.9%44.7%3.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPolo_4_lifeFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,897 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning34
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +124ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.6
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning3.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.07
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−166ms
first ⅓ avg 723ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 18 Jul
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 19 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · dust2, 19 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 31nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31191261%-0.01
dust2B28141450%-0.03
ancientD124833%-0.03
cacheA95456%-0.05
nukeD82625%-0.03
poseidon41325%-0.04
anubis31233%-0.02
inferno3030%-0.01
sanctum2020%-0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,207Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
2,099Matches
41.4%Match win rate
36.1%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
4,129MVPs
1,234Hours (in match)
1,559Bombs planted
318Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,938dust2
1,121inferno
703nuke
312vertigo
251train
76cbble
36office
26italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

37Matches
38%Win rate
0.62Avg K/D
55.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1656%0.597.7
Dust2933%0.7812.7
Ancient540%0.477.6
Nuke30%0.5710.3
Inferno20%0.6611.0
Anubis20%0.539.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
27.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.8%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
579msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.36HE damage / grenade
10.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4409% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0716%6 Sept
mirage16–140.0514%6 Sept
dust26–13-0.046%25 Aug
cache13–40.0221%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.080%20 Aug
mirage13–70.0813%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.066%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0113%13 Aug
dust24–13-0.1120%13 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0514%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.049%13 Aug
dust213–30.0426%13 Aug
ancient4–13-0.076%30 Jul
cache13–50.0116%22 Jul
dust20–13-0.050%22 Jul
dust213–00.000%22 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0119%20 Jul
mirage13–110.1329%20 Jul
mirage8–130.1422%20 Jul
mirage9–130.0927%20 Jul
dust213–60.0848%19 Jul
dust216–130.0331%19 Jul
anubis16–140.0220%18 Jul
ancient13–20.2525%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0911%16 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0619%16 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0315%15 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0218%15 Jul
dust213–7-0.080%15 Jul
dust213–100.0225%5 Jul
mirage16–130.0728%2 Jul
dust213–20.0443%2 Jul
nuke11–130.0328%2 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0323%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0630%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0741%30 Jun
dust216–13-0.0319%16 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0015%16 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0716%15 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0919%5 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0214%4 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0511%2 Jun
ancient13–10-0.025%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.0520%1 Jun
mirage13–1-0.0213%1 Jun
mirage13–40.0013%31 May
dust210–13-0.0817%31 May
inferno4–130.0116%31 May
mirage6–13-0.0713%25 May
dust210–13-0.0413%25 May
mirage8–13-0.0717%24 May
mirage13–7-0.0114%24 May
ancient11–13-0.0610%21 May
ancient7–13-0.072%19 May
dust213–7-0.0133%19 May
nuke9–50.0325%19 May
poseidon9–6-0.0815%19 May
sanctum8–8-0.1723%19 May
mirage11–13-0.0414%18 May
mirage0–13-0.0810%15 May
dust213–9-0.0227%15 May
dust210–130.0525%14 May
mirage13–90.0415%13 May
ancient13–16-0.0710%12 May
nuke6–13-0.0525%11 May
ancient11–13-0.0415%11 May
cache0–4-0.1122%10 May
poseidon7–9-0.1014%10 May
poseidon8–8-0.0314%10 May
sanctum2–9-0.2211%10 May
cache10–13-0.1317%8 May
mirage11–13-0.089%8 May
dust25–13-0.095%6 May
nuke13–11-0.0121%6 May
anubis5–13-0.0612%6 May
nuke1–13-0.1115%6 May
poseidon8–80.049%3 May
dust213–9-0.066%2 May
ancient8–13-0.1124%1 May
dust29–13-0.0615%1 May
cache13–9-0.0413%30 Apr
cache1–7-0.0533%29 Apr
cache13–110.0018%29 Apr
cache4–13-0.1025%29 Apr
cache13–4-0.0717%29 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0324%28 Apr
dust25–13-0.0817%27 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0819%26 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0410%26 Apr
dust216–13-0.0717%25 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0122%25 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0512%24 Apr
dust23–13-0.090%23 Apr
mirage13–5-0.027%23 Apr
ancient13–3-0.047%23 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0111%22 Apr
mirage5–13-0.078%20 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0714%20 Apr
mirage8–13-0.087%19 Apr
dust213–60.007%19 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →