Scarly

Scarly — CS2 Stats

76561198091195455[U:1:130929727]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,354Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating20,115Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70808 of 221496 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 1 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,115 -2,665 1 Jun16 Sept · 26 days played
14,27823,498peak 23,4981 Jun16 Sept
23,633Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-06-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,383 below peak (23,498)
  • +5,230 over 30 days · improving
  • -2,380 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,885 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGScarlyFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,115 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning57
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45541Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −6.5pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.7
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.07
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time523ms−117ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 10 Sept
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 9 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35161946%0.00
mirageB28131546%0.00
ancientA148657%0.01
cacheA106460%0.00
nukeD72529%0.00
anubis3030%-0.05
inferno3030%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

153Matches
54%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
72.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage667%0.9413.8
Ancient4100%0.9014.3
Dust2333%0.589.7
Anubis367%1.0115.3
Inferno1100%1.0813.0
Nuke1100%1.7319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
528msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
56.7%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
13.2%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
11.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.0510%16 Sept
dust213–5-0.0018%16 Sept
dust29–13-0.0510%16 Sept
dust29–13-0.0815%15 Sept
dust213–40.0123%15 Sept
dust29–13-0.043%14 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0721%14 Sept
cache7–10.0122%14 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0418%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0113%13 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0619%13 Sept
mirage13–90.0826%12 Sept
dust213–160.0817%11 Sept
dust213–30.0431%11 Sept
dust213–110.1027%11 Sept
mirage13–20.1520%11 Sept
dust26–130.0415%11 Sept
anubis8–130.0118%11 Sept
mirage13–70.1221%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0223%11 Sept
dust29–130.0330%10 Sept
nuke13–100.0821%10 Sept
mirage16–130.0623%10 Sept
dust213–70.2326%10 Sept
mirage13–100.2032%10 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0413%9 Sept
dust213–30.1354%9 Sept
dust213–00.1438%9 Sept
cache13–90.2125%9 Sept
cache13–80.0921%9 Sept
ancient13–110.0316%9 Sept
dust213–70.0631%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0818%9 Sept
cache13–7-0.0127%30 Aug
inferno7–13-0.039%30 Aug
cache5–13-0.047%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0421%29 Aug
dust29–130.0117%29 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0225%29 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0713%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0811%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0223%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0526%28 Aug
dust213–5-0.0425%28 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0513%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0721%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.029%28 Aug
mirage13–60.0119%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0419%27 Aug
dust24–13-0.0512%26 Aug
mirage13–50.0321%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0818%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0425%25 Aug
dust213–5-0.0114%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0115%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0219%24 Aug
ancient6–130.0218%24 Aug
dust213–110.0411%24 Aug
ancient13–40.008%24 Aug
mirage2–13-0.140%19 Aug
ancient8–130.0116%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0127%19 Aug
cache13–7-0.0221%18 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0919%18 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0114%18 Aug
mirage9–130.0019%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0226%17 Aug
ancient9–130.0127%15 Aug
ancient13–60.059%15 Aug
cache12–16-0.0721%14 Aug
dust213–16-0.0212%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0130%14 Aug
cache13–6-0.0022%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.108%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0622%14 Aug
mirage6–130.0014%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0442%13 Aug
dust210–130.008%13 Aug
dust24–13-0.0813%13 Aug
nuke10–130.0414%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0421%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0321%30 Jul
dust24–13-0.0239%30 Jul
anubis2–13-0.1217%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.067%20 Jul
nuke11–130.0020%2 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0419%24 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0010%17 Jun
nuke2–6-0.0431%14 Jun
dust211–130.0131%10 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0413%8 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0625%4 Jun
dust213–110.0115%4 Jun
nuke11–130.0320%3 Jun
dust213–11-0.0228%3 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0428%3 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0216%2 Jun
ancient13–100.0514%2 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0212%1 Jun
dust210–13-0.028%1 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →