KR0B3R

KR0B3R — CS2 Stats

DE76561198372297085[U:1:412031357]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

987Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
982Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 987
−3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,575 +1,249 22 Apr – 25 Sept · 27 days played
7,70512,734peak 12,73422 Apr25 Sept
12,734Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-04-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.88——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches2——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.88——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,993), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate54.3%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy12.4%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.140.991.02above
Match win rate44.0%43.9%44.7%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKR0B3RFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning55
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–56–2Last 10042%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 700ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time660ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 17 Jun →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 23 Jun →
484msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 24 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 23 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC259–1636%-0.01
ancientS1913–668%-0.00
cacheD165–1131%-0.01
nukeA169–756%0.02
dust2D81–713%-0.03
overpassD51–420%-0.00
mirage—41–325%-0.01
anubis—21–150%-0.01
poseidon—11–0100%-0.00
debris—10–10%-0.16
office—10–10%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.06
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,560Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2,755Matches
44.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
54.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,983MVPs
982Hours (in match)
2,955Bombs planted
649Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,143inferno
2,384dust2
1,877nuke
1,297vertigo
1,257office
666cbble
565train
303lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
48%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.5ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1856%1.2913.7
Ancient1547%1.0514.2
Mirage862%0.9515.1
Vertigo650%1.0616.0
Anubis667%0.9015.8
Cache633%0.9913.3
Dust260%0.8315.3
Nuke5100%1.5019.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
657msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.55HE damage / grenade
6.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1056% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache3–13-0.0418%29 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0316%28 Aug →
inferno19–150.0218%13 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0421%12 Aug →
inferno8–130.0221%12 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0121%12 Aug →
nuke13–110.0125%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.0420%12 Aug →
poseidon9–3-0.0024%12 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0316%11 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0610%11 Aug →
debris5–9-0.1621%11 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.079%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0119%11 Aug →
dust27–130.0029%11 Aug →
cache7–13-0.089%11 Aug →
ancient13–110.0427%9 Aug →
inferno2–130.0525%8 Aug →
nuke13–110.0125%8 Aug →
inferno10–00.0225%8 Aug →
nuke13–80.0423%8 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0021%8 Aug →
nuke13–70.0917%7 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0019%7 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0319%7 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0326%6 Aug →
inferno12–160.0217%6 Aug →
cache5–130.0222%5 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0122%5 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0524%5 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0519%3 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0315%9 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0118%8 Jul →
office7–130.0329%8 Jul →
inferno13–50.0435%7 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0126%5 Jul →
nuke13–20.1131%1 Jul →
overpass4–13-0.0319%24 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0720%24 Jun →
nuke6–130.0317%24 Jun →
dust24–13-0.1147%23 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0318%23 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0224%22 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0239%22 Jun →
nuke5–130.0125%21 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0020%21 Jun →
ancient13–110.0115%21 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0314%21 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0530%21 Jun →
ancient16–130.0225%20 Jun →
nuke7–130.0020%20 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0417%20 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0318%19 Jun →
ancient15–150.0629%18 Jun →
inferno8–130.0519%18 Jun →
ancient13–30.029%17 Jun →
overpass13–20.0414%17 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0211%17 Jun →
nuke13–60.1431%17 Jun →
dust210–130.0125%17 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0121%16 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0418%16 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0122%13 Jun →
nuke13–80.0128%12 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0628%12 Jun →
ancient5–00.0433%12 Jun →
dust23–13-0.1226%11 Jun →
mirage9–130.0031%11 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0213%11 Jun →
dust23–130.0022%11 Jun →
dust213–60.0636%11 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0025%14 May →
cache7–130.0212%8 May →
inferno11–130.0333%7 May →
cache9–130.0523%5 May →
cache12–12-0.0516%4 May →
overpass12–16-0.0120%3 May →
inferno13–20.0123%2 May →
dust26–13-0.079%2 May →
cache13–90.0415%2 May →
cache13–70.0313%2 May →
cache11–130.0528%2 May →
cache13–8-0.0410%2 May →
cache11–13-0.0611%29 Apr →
cache2–13-0.0824%28 Apr →
vertigo9–20.0636%26 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0817%25 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0323%24 Apr →
inferno13–90.0518%24 Apr →
ancient13–100.0519%24 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0615%24 Apr →
inferno3–9-0.0535%24 Apr →
mirage16–190.0221%24 Apr →
nuke8–130.0424%23 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0716%23 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0015%23 Apr →
cache13–00.0438%23 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0219%22 Apr →
nuke5–130.0523%22 Apr →
train7–13-0.0220%22 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.