ZEUS — CS2 Stats

AT76561198369836066[U:1:409570338]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,619Tracked matches41%Win rate2024Tracked since

1,704Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating23,835Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#34690 of 261506 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,835 +530 25 Sept – 12 Nov · 12 days played

24,428Peak Premier in tracked matches

40Days played since 2026-09-21

Premier CS Rating

593 below peak (24,428)
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,165 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-10-28
Purple band first seen 2026-10-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	48.5%	44.8%	45.7%	above
Shot accuracy	4.1%	12.4%	12.7%	8.7% short
Kill/death ratio	1.05	1.03	1.05	meets
Match win rate	49.0%	45.2%	45.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning67

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLTWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 27%
Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

4–4–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

9–9–2 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1

Utility6.6

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch7.6

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning6.7

Utility6.6

Mechanics3.1

Opening Duels5.8

Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time489ms−18ms

first ⅓ avg 507ms → last ⅓ avg 489ms

Headshot accuracy24.3%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 11–13 · nuke, 22 Sept →

100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 8 Oct →

375msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · nuke, 1 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
vertigo	B	41	20–21	49%	0.01
ancient	A	24	15–9	63%	0.06
nuke	S	17	11–6	65%	0.02
mirage	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
dust2	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
cache	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,949Lifetime kills

1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players

2,443Matches

49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players

48.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players

4.1%Shot accuracy

6,052MVPs

862Hours (in match)

1,830Bombs planted

532Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,025

XM10145,414

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,228

AWP3,445

P2000 / USP-S2,443

Zeus x271,957

MAG-71,850

Desert Eagle1,814

SSG 081,429

Glock-181,419

Lifetime map wins

2,804nuke

2,629inferno

1,966vertigo

1,570dust2

215train

215lake

33cbble

14assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

97Matches

53%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

83.0ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

58%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	29	59%	1.07	16.1
Inferno	18	56%	1.23	15.9
Ancient	17	47%	1.19	18.5
Dust2	15	40%	1.06	16.4
Nuke	8	50%	1.32	14.6
Anubis	7	57%	1.11	14.7
Train	2	50%	0.96	15.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.08	27.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

64.0%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

490msReaction time

53.6%T opening success

52.5%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

10.79HE damage / grenade

17.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	11–13	0.03	33%	12 Nov →
ancient	13–6	0.05	35%	12 Nov →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	20%	11 Nov →
vertigo	13–6	0.01	26%	10 Nov →
cache	9–13	0.03	20%	9 Nov →
vertigo	12–12	0.04	32%	9 Nov →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	36%	8 Nov →
nuke	13–8	0.04	14%	8 Nov →
ancient	12–12	0.03	30%	5 Nov →
ancient	8–13	0.07	17%	3 Nov →
cache	13–9	-0.01	12%	2 Nov →
dust2	13–11	-0.07	14%	2 Nov →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	24%	2 Nov →
ancient	14–16	0.04	21%	2 Nov →
ancient	13–7	0.06	14%	1 Nov →
nuke	2–13	-0.11	17%	1 Nov →
nuke	13–5	0.09	13%	1 Nov →
cache	7–13	-0.03	18%	1 Nov →
nuke	7–13	0.04	32%	31 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.06	30%	31 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	22%	31 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	25%	30 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	27%	30 Oct →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	20%	30 Oct →
nuke	12–12	0.07	11%	29 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	34%	29 Oct →
anubis	8–13	0.00	35%	29 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	21%	29 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.11	14%	28 Oct →
ancient	6–10	0.10	58%	28 Oct →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	15%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.10	42%	27 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	20%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.04	47%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	15%	26 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.07	33%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.07	24%	25 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.07	34%	25 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	11%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.03	9%	24 Oct →
ancient	12–12	0.11	28%	24 Oct →
ancient	8–13	0.03	17%	23 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.07	31%	22 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	-0.03	29%	21 Oct →
vertigo	7–13	0.04	32%	20 Oct →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	11%	18 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	-0.04	24%	17 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	14%	17 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	0.07	24%	16 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.09	26%	9 Oct →
nuke	10–4	0.02	42%	9 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.01	29%	9 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.03	100%	8 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.10	34%	7 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	0.01	26%	5 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	25%	3 Oct →
vertigo	4–13	-0.04	18%	3 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.06	28%	3 Oct →
ancient	12–12	0.05	39%	2 Oct →
ancient	13–5	0.06	29%	2 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.12	37%	2 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	0.00	23%	2 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	19%	1 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	26%	1 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	20%	1 Oct →
vertigo	4–13	-0.01	40%	1 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	62%	30 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	12%	30 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.09	28%	29 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	-0.02	42%	29 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	17%	29 Sept →
vertigo	13–11	0.10	43%	29 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.01	25%	27 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.07	22%	27 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	0.03	18%	27 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.00	30%	26 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	-0.05	31%	26 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.03	17%	26 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.04	29%	26 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	0.07	23%	26 Sept →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	33%	25 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	0.06	23%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.02	31%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	21%	25 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	17%	25 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.05	20%	24 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	-0.02	17%	24 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	17%	24 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	-0.01	28%	24 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	21%	23 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	0.05	30%	23 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.09	26%	22 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.00	42%	22 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.13	27%	22 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.02	21%	22 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.04	26%	21 Sept →
vertigo	7–13	-0.05	9%	21 Sept →
vertigo	10–13	0.02	33%	21 Sept →
vertigo	13–2	0.10	32%	21 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	21%	21 Sept →