Keyser_Bricks

Keyser_Bricks — CS2 Stats

76561198366930748[U:1:406665020]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,827Tracked matches31%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,076Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,350 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,350 → 1,350
+25Tracked matches · now 3,827
−15.4ppWin rate · 46.4% → 31.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,350 +0 30 Aug – 18 Sept · 2 observations
1,3501,350peak 1,35030 Aug18 Sept
1,350Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-05-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,350
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.4%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy7.5%12.4%12.7%5.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.031.05meets
Match win rate46.7%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKeyser_BricksFACEITLevel 6 · 1,350 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,350csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning67
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–45–9Last 10046%Win rateTLLLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 4–15–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time587ms−105ms
first ⅓ avg 692ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 9 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · cache, 4 May →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · dust2, 6 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 14anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2712–1544%0.04
infernoB209–1145%0.05
nukeC146–843%0.02
cacheA148–657%0.03
mirageC94–544%0.04
anubisC83–538%0.05
vertigo—31–233%0.09
train—21–150%0.03
ancient—10–10%0.02
fachwerk—11–0100%0.11
office—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,728Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5,608Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
7.5%Shot accuracy
14,055MVPs
2,076Hours (in match)
6,667Bombs planted
1,580Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,418
AWP8,839
MP92,869
MAC-102,798
SSG 081,540

Lifetime map wins

10,989dust2
10,617inferno
5,040nuke
3,146vertigo
1,530train
455office
326lake
80italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches
55%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
78.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24549%1.0414.6
Mirage2948%1.2218.4
Inferno2568%1.2718.1
Ancient1567%1.1116.1
Anubis1464%1.0917.2
Nuke1040%1.0116.3
Train757%1.0717.7
Vertigo40%0.9518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
570msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.88HE damage / grenade
6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4952 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1534% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–120.0529%11 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0118%11 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0431%10 Oct →
nuke3–130.0318%10 Oct →
dust213–80.1419%6 Oct →
vertigo6–13-0.0419%4 Oct →
dust27–130.1022%4 Oct →
dust213–110.0312%2 Oct →
anubis9–130.027%2 Oct →
train6–130.0111%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.0425%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.1222%27 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0213%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0323%23 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.1313%23 Sept →
dust29–130.0224%19 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0921%19 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0313%19 Sept →
anubis3–130.0420%19 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0222%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0031%19 Sept →
nuke9–30.0213%18 Sept →
dust213–10.1030%18 Sept →
inferno9–40.2317%17 Sept →
ancient7–130.0215%17 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0222%14 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0338%13 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.2223%13 Sept →
inferno9–10.1117%9 Sept →
anubis7–130.0422%4 Sept →
cache2–130.0112%4 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0014%4 Sept →
anubis13–110.0817%3 Sept →
cache13–20.0717%3 Sept →
dust27–30.0327%3 Sept →
inferno7–90.0936%31 Aug →
dust213–80.0315%31 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0516%25 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0414%28 Jul →
dust29–130.0632%28 Jul →
inferno5–130.0516%27 Jul →
dust210–130.0110%27 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0129%27 Jul →
inferno12–120.0921%26 Jul →
anubis13–80.1718%26 Jul →
mirage13–80.1427%18 Jul →
cache11–60.0233%18 Jul →
fachwerk13–50.1121%18 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0924%18 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.0235%14 Jul →
inferno6–90.0416%14 Jul →
dust213–50.1024%14 Jul →
office7–00.1317%14 Jul →
inferno5–90.0720%9 Jul →
inferno9–30.3426%9 Jul →
inferno9–60.0221%18 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0917%15 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0114%15 Jun →
inferno13–70.0825%15 Jun →
nuke13–40.0519%14 Jun →
dust212–120.0120%13 Jun →
cache13–80.0832%7 Jun →
dust29–130.0527%7 Jun →
anubis5–130.0418%7 Jun →
mirage12–120.0311%7 Jun →
dust23–130.0631%6 Jun →
dust213–110.1326%5 Jun →
vertigo13–80.2123%31 May →
dust213–90.0727%31 May →
nuke7–20.0723%30 May →
dust212–12-0.018%21 May →
inferno13–20.1219%20 May →
dust213–60.1418%20 May →
cache13–50.0917%20 May →
nuke13–100.0726%17 May →
dust213–11-0.0219%17 May →
mirage8–130.0131%16 May →
nuke12–120.0321%13 May →
dust25–13-0.0321%13 May →
inferno13–60.0622%13 May →
cache13–60.0023%13 May →
mirage13–100.0412%12 May →
dust213–110.0222%10 May →
mirage4–13-0.049%10 May →
mirage13–90.0526%9 May →
inferno9–130.0323%8 May →
cache13–30.1239%8 May →
inferno13–40.0524%8 May →
nuke13–70.0326%8 May →
dust213–100.0720%5 May →
anubis13–60.0721%5 May →
cache5–130.0027%5 May →
cache12–12-0.0136%4 May →
nuke13–30.1924%4 May →
cache5–130.01100%4 May →
nuke12–120.0214%2 May →
cache13–110.0523%2 May →
train13–40.0522%2 May →
cache10–13-0.0015%2 May →
cache13–6-0.0231%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.