⭐ SUPERGIRL Emilaxe ⭐

⭐ SUPERGIRL Emilaxe ⭐ — CS2 Stats

FR76561198356858006[U:1:396592278]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,394Tracked matches23%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,574Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingAll-Rounder
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,601Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,169Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-01-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,169
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG⭐ SUPERGIRL Emilaxe ⭐PEAK ELO1,169csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning48
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–51Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.6
Utility4.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time571ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 12 Jan →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 16–12 · inferno, 17 Jul →
367msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 1 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 1 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3618–1850%-0.02
infernoC2310–1343%-0.00
overpassA127–558%-0.02
mirageD103–730%-0.04
nukeC73–443%-0.00
ancientS65–183%0.00
anubis—41–325%-0.01
cache—11–0100%-0.05
train—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,750Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
5,862Matches
36.6%Match win rate
48.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
10,383MVPs
1,857Hours (in match)
4,664Bombs planted
896Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,224
AWP2,787
MP72,283
MP92,066
MAC-101,885
FAMAS1,838

Lifetime map wins

10,876dust2
10,144inferno
2,028nuke
1,095cbble
661vertigo
243train
229lake
206office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

228Matches
48%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
65.2ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26258%0.8612.8
Inferno3741%0.7912.6
Overpass2167%0.9914.4
Mirage1937%0.8311.6
Ancient1547%0.7812.8
Nuke1145%1.0219.2
Anubis729%0.639.4
Cache450%0.6612.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
26.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
598msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
5.93HE damage / grenade
6.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.323% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–130.0917%17 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0218%4 Sept →
inferno9–20.0942%5 Aug →
inferno16–120.0848%17 Jul →
inferno9–30.0313%15 Jun →
inferno9–60.0527%13 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0412%16 May →
dust20–20.000%16 May →
inferno5–90.0129%8 May →
dust211–13-0.0831%4 May →
cache13–8-0.0524%28 Apr →
dust213–160.0832%28 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.069%22 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0627%20 Apr →
overpass8–130.0124%20 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0333%10 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0125%9 Apr →
dust20–13-0.1213%8 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0332%6 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0922%31 Mar →
inferno19–170.0525%30 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0716%30 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0330%26 Mar →
dust216–130.0034%26 Mar →
overpass2–13-0.1125%24 Mar →
dust23–130.0111%24 Mar →
nuke13–16-0.0038%18 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0228%18 Mar →
mirage16–12-0.0227%14 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0716%1 Mar →
dust213–10.0538%1 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0517%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0436%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0524%27 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0624%26 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0327%25 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0528%23 Feb →
ancient16–13-0.0222%23 Feb →
overpass13–60.0530%23 Feb →
overpass13–40.0631%22 Feb →
dust22–13-0.0613%22 Feb →
ancient13–60.0617%22 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0230%21 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0637%21 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0417%20 Feb →
ancient13–80.0222%19 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0717%19 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0519%18 Feb →
nuke16–12-0.0135%17 Feb →
dust213–10.0125%17 Feb →
inferno11–130.0421%15 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0518%15 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0434%15 Feb →
inferno13–60.0218%13 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0012%13 Feb →
dust216–19-0.0126%12 Feb →
dust213–16-0.0630%11 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0215%10 Feb →
dust213–7-0.0336%8 Feb →
dust213–110.0022%8 Feb →
dust214–120.0230%8 Feb →
dust213–50.0226%8 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0127%7 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0343%7 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0533%7 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0724%6 Feb →
nuke11–130.0034%6 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0229%5 Feb →
nuke13–80.0632%5 Feb →
ancient13–2-0.0513%5 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0613%5 Feb →
nuke28–260.0136%4 Feb →
dust213–100.0424%4 Feb →
ancient13–60.0514%2 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0214%1 Feb →
inferno4–13-0.0716%1 Feb →
overpass13–3-0.0224%1 Feb →
dust213–90.0113%1 Feb →
dust216–14-0.0511%1 Feb →
dust213–70.0128%29 Jan →
inferno9–130.0510%28 Jan →
overpass9–130.0115%27 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0318%27 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0133%26 Jan →
inferno13–40.0030%26 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0423%26 Jan →
overpass13–2-0.0332%25 Jan →
anubis2–13-0.099%20 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0121%19 Jan →
inferno13–11-0.0218%18 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0035%18 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0513%18 Jan →
dust213–16-0.0524%17 Jan →
inferno14–16-0.0518%17 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.0135%16 Jan →
dust213–110.1029%12 Jan →
train16–13-0.0526%11 Jan →
anubis13–30.0228%11 Jan →
dust213–8-0.0535%11 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0217%9 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.