Pyro

Pyro — CS2 Stats

GT76561198354798199[U:1:394532471]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

996Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,173Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,354Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57148 of 221388 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 3 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,354 +1,626 26 Aug11 Sept · 11 days played
19,68121,890peak 21,89026 Aug11 Sept
21,952Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-01-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 536 below peak (21,890)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,646 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches8
Win rate13%
K/D0.62
Headshot %55%

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.5%43.8%44.9%5.4% short
Shot accuracy17.2%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.871.021.040.17 short
Match win rate45.0%44.7%45.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPyroFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,354 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning46
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46495Last 10046%Win rateTLLLLLWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 172 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.6
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time591ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 2 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 11 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 12 Sept
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 22 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9cacheWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21111052%-0.03
nukeD1441029%-0.02
dust2A148657%0.00
vertigoC104640%-0.02
ancientS96367%-0.01
cacheD81713%-0.02
anubisB63350%-0.01
mirageD51420%-0.04
overpass42250%-0.05
train42250%0.01
poseidon220100%0.12
eldorado110100%-0.08
debris110100%0.04
sanctum1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

68,273Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
5,017Matches
45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
39.5%Headshot %
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
15,392MVPs
1,391Hours (in match)
4,807Bombs planted
1,392Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP15,956
AK-4714,746
Knife1,968
MP91,960
MAC-101,808

Lifetime map wins

6,818inferno
5,335vertigo
4,255dust2
3,642nuke
3,052train
469cbble
94lake
74italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

255Matches
49%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
62.1ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

19%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo2343%0.9213.8
Ancient2055%1.1516.8
Anubis2050%1.0213.4
Nuke1443%0.9714.0
Dust2540%0.9312.6
Mirage367%1.2915.0
Inferno1100%1.0018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
6.2°Preaim
566msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
10.10HE damage / grenade
2.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.2577 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3436% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–8-0.0421%12 Sept
inferno2–9-0.0616%12 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1225%12 Sept
overpass5–9-0.168%12 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0516%11 Sept
dust29–13-0.0144%11 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0126%11 Sept
ancient5–130.0221%11 Sept
cache14–160.0215%6 Sept
anubis15–150.0518%6 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0616%5 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0316%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0110%4 Sept
cache14–16-0.0516%3 Sept
mirage1–13-0.140%3 Sept
cache15–15-0.0626%2 Sept
anubis13–60.0217%2 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0615%2 Sept
poseidon9–20.1729%2 Sept
eldorado9–7-0.0819%2 Sept
debris9–30.0426%2 Sept
dust216–140.0121%2 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0529%2 Sept
dust25–130.0122%2 Sept
nuke4–13-0.1127%1 Sept
dust28–13-0.0933%1 Sept
cache13–100.066%31 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0111%31 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0124%31 Aug
dust216–14-0.0724%31 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.1418%31 Aug
ancient13–50.0915%31 Aug
nuke7–90.0122%31 Aug
inferno6–90.0418%31 Aug
nuke4–90.0135%31 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0225%27 Aug
nuke15–150.0923%27 Aug
inferno9–5-0.1215%27 Aug
vertigo9–50.1212%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0121%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0218%26 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0725%26 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0628%25 Aug
cache14–160.0121%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0433%25 Aug
inferno9–20.0219%24 Aug
dust213–110.0823%24 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0413%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0433%23 Aug
cache6–13-0.0418%23 Aug
nuke13–60.0011%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0513%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0614%22 Aug
cache11–13-0.0124%22 Aug
dust213–6-0.0213%22 Aug
nuke13–30.0324%22 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0717%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.0531%22 Aug
ancient12–4-0.0414%3 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0017%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0022%3 Aug
mirage1–6-0.0438%10 Jul
cache8–13-0.0718%10 Jul
vertigo9–20.0714%25 Feb
overpass9–40.068%25 Feb
vertigo13–10-0.0217%20 Feb
train13–100.0119%18 Feb
dust213–30.0619%18 Feb
anubis13–80.028%18 Feb
dust213–6-0.0114%18 Feb
overpass1–9-0.1115%17 Feb
sanctum6–9-0.058%17 Feb
vertigo9–60.0417%15 Feb
vertigo7–9-0.0522%15 Feb
poseidon9–60.0811%12 Feb
nuke4–9-0.189%12 Feb
inferno2–9-0.168%12 Feb
nuke3–9-0.0921%12 Feb
dust213–30.1419%10 Feb
overpass12–40.019%10 Feb
vertigo7–90.0626%10 Feb
vertigo7–9-0.108%10 Feb
nuke9–20.1010%18 Jan
vertigo6–9-0.0726%18 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0318%18 Jan
dust211–13-0.0120%18 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0810%18 Jan
inferno9–7-0.0321%5 Jan
inferno9–60.0718%5 Jan
inferno7–9-0.0519%5 Jan
inferno3–9-0.0220%5 Jan
train13–30.0818%5 Jan
train8–13-0.0326%5 Jan
train4–13-0.0413%5 Jan
inferno9–40.0623%3 Jan
nuke9–40.0416%3 Jan
inferno9–50.0435%3 Jan
inferno9–7-0.0116%3 Jan
inferno3–9-0.0935%3 Jan
vertigo4–9-0.0925%3 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →