gabe

gabe — CS2 Stats

AM76561198353354341[U:1:393088613]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,057Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,173Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,454Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-08-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches48——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.70——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 25 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,573), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.8%45.7%46.8%7.0% short
Shot accuracy1.3%12.7%13.0%11.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.051.060.11 short
Match win rate44.7%45.7%46.3%1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgabeFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,454csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning60
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateWTLLTWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–2–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.6
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.6

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time569ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 30 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 12 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2711–1641%0.03
dust2B179–853%0.02
infernoD165–1131%-0.01
nukeC125–742%0.02
ancientB115–645%-0.02
anubisS64–267%0.02
cacheS64–267%-0.03
vertigo—42–250%-0.02
shelter—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,416Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,851Matches
44.7%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
1.3%Shot accuracy
6,538MVPs
1,319Hours (in match)
2,958Bombs planted
923Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,053dust2
5,207nuke
3,232inferno
1,167train
967vertigo
97office
45italy
7cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

352Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
76.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10848%1.0313.8
Dust26448%1.0415.2
Nuke5553%1.1917.2
Inferno5153%1.0214.4
Anubis2458%1.1416.5
Ancient2035%0.7612.2
Cache1267%0.9713.6
Overpass812%0.8714.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
561msReaction time
64.6%T opening success
37.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
4.25HE damage / grenade
6.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8129% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.057% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.1112%25 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0711%21 Oct →
nuke11–130.0118%14 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0421%12 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.025%12 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0320%10 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0515%10 Oct →
mirage7–80.0421%9 Oct →
dust20–5-0.0815%9 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.047%9 Oct →
inferno11–130.0213%9 Oct →
anubis13–100.0216%8 Oct →
dust213–30.038%4 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0024%4 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0119%3 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0114%2 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0722%2 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.017%1 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0115%30 Sept →
dust24–90.0225%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0310%28 Sept →
anubis22–190.0210%27 Sept →
inferno6–130.0220%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.025%24 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0411%24 Sept →
dust213–100.0620%23 Sept →
mirage0–5-0.090%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0723%23 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.078%21 Sept →
mirage9–130.1127%21 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0410%20 Sept →
ancient13–90.0720%20 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0210%18 Sept →
dust212–120.0611%18 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0415%16 Sept →
mirage13–70.1720%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0614%14 Sept →
ancient13–60.0316%13 Sept →
mirage13–60.1711%13 Sept →
mirage10–130.0217%13 Sept →
ancient11–130.0218%13 Sept →
mirage6–130.0419%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.0433%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.1120%12 Sept →
mirage4–130.0318%11 Sept →
nuke3–90.0512%9 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0113%9 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0410%9 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0212%9 Sept →
dust213–50.0321%8 Sept →
vertigo15–19-0.0419%8 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0414%8 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0820%7 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0422%6 Sept →
anubis2–60.048%6 Sept →
inferno13–10.0830%6 Sept →
mirage16–130.0613%5 Sept →
cache13–90.039%5 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0613%5 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0710%4 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0426%4 Sept →
mirage6–130.0721%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0323%4 Sept →
mirage13–20.0618%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0211%3 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0210%2 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0517%2 Sept →
nuke13–40.0016%2 Sept →
inferno13–90.029%1 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0124%1 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.069%31 Aug →
dust213–50.1116%31 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.080%31 Aug →
ancient13–20.0111%31 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0710%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0315%30 Aug →
nuke13–20.1913%30 Aug →
vertigo13–9-0.0016%28 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0412%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0217%28 Aug →
shelter13–90.0015%28 Aug →
inferno13–70.0217%28 Aug →
dust28–130.0412%27 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0225%26 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0015%25 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0212%25 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0411%23 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0417%23 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0119%19 Aug →
mirage13–40.038%18 Aug →
nuke13–50.0817%17 Aug →
anubis13–60.0913%16 Aug →
mirage9–130.0325%16 Aug →
dust23–13-0.014%15 Aug →
mirage8–130.0412%15 Aug →
nuke6–130.0313%13 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0217%12 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0013%12 Aug →
mirage13–20.0916%10 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0623%10 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.