gabe

gabe — CS2 Stats

AM76561198353354341[U:1:393088613]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,016Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,293Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+6Tracked matches · now 2,016
+4.9ppWin rate · 43.3% → 48.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

40Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate39.6%44.8%45.7%6.2% short
Shot accuracy1.3%12.4%12.7%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.041.050.10 short
Match win rate44.5%45.2%45.7%1.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgabeFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning67
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateWTWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.6
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.7
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time572ms−121ms
first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 7 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 29 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34142041%0.01
infernoC1761135%-0.00
dust2A1610663%0.02
nukeB136746%0.05
ancientC73443%-0.01
vertigo42250%-0.02
anubis42250%0.02
cache42250%-0.04
shelter110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,322Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,799Matches
44.5%Match win rate
39.6%Headshot %
1.3%Shot accuracy
6,376MVPs
1,293Hours (in match)
2,908Bombs planted
903Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,936dust2
5,155nuke
3,201inferno
1,167train
967vertigo
97office
45italy
7cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

335Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10249%1.0313.9
Dust26148%1.0515.0
Nuke5252%1.2117.3
Inferno4953%1.0214.4
Anubis2357%1.1415.9
Ancient1833%0.7812.4
Cache1267%0.9713.6
Overpass812%0.8714.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
570msReaction time
52.2%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
6.91HE damage / grenade
5.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–5-0.0210%18 Sept
dust212–120.0611%18 Sept
mirage13–70.1720%14 Sept
dust213–110.0614%14 Sept
ancient13–60.0316%13 Sept
mirage13–60.1711%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0217%13 Sept
ancient11–130.0218%13 Sept
mirage6–130.0419%12 Sept
mirage8–130.0433%12 Sept
mirage11–130.1120%12 Sept
mirage4–130.0318%11 Sept
nuke3–90.0512%9 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0113%9 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0410%9 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0212%9 Sept
dust213–50.0321%8 Sept
vertigo15–19-0.0419%8 Sept
nuke12–16-0.0414%8 Sept
inferno3–9-0.0820%7 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.0422%6 Sept
anubis2–60.048%6 Sept
inferno13–10.0830%6 Sept
mirage16–130.0613%5 Sept
cache13–90.039%5 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0613%5 Sept
inferno0–13-0.0710%4 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0426%4 Sept
mirage6–130.0721%4 Sept
dust24–13-0.0323%4 Sept
mirage13–20.0618%3 Sept
nuke13–80.0211%3 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0210%2 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0517%2 Sept
nuke13–40.0016%2 Sept
inferno13–90.029%1 Sept
vertigo6–130.0124%1 Sept
inferno10–13-0.069%31 Aug
dust213–50.1116%31 Aug
mirage2–13-0.080%31 Aug
ancient13–20.0111%31 Aug
cache2–13-0.0710%31 Aug
mirage13–110.0315%30 Aug
nuke13–20.1913%30 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0016%28 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0412%28 Aug
dust213–80.0217%28 Aug
shelter13–90.0015%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0217%28 Aug
dust28–130.0412%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0225%26 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0015%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0212%25 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0411%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0417%23 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0119%19 Aug
mirage13–40.038%18 Aug
nuke13–50.0817%17 Aug
anubis13–60.0913%16 Aug
mirage9–130.0325%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.014%15 Aug
mirage8–130.0412%15 Aug
nuke6–130.0313%13 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0217%12 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0013%12 Aug
mirage13–20.0916%10 Aug
cache13–7-0.0623%10 Aug
inferno9–50.1626%7 Aug
nuke9–10.3719%7 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0024%7 Aug
dust213–110.0625%7 Aug
dust213–90.0124%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0110%6 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0619%6 Aug
anubis13–100.0223%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0016%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0432%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0619%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.059%3 Aug
mirage13–20.0226%3 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0115%3 Aug
mirage3–40.0417%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0414%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0414%2 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0332%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0512%2 Aug
dust213–6-0.0024%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0211%29 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0136%29 Jul
dust213–110.0313%28 Jul
dust213–90.0126%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0122%27 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0227%27 Jul
nuke11–130.0319%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0424%27 Jul
cache8–13-0.0411%26 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0714%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0320%25 Jul
ancient12–120.0324%23 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0815%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →