Mambopeek

Mambopeek — CS2 Stats

76561198347023070[U:1:386757342]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,564Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,119Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,305Purple band · top ~15.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#93911 of 221149 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 952 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,305 +5,150 18 Aug16 Sept · 24 days played
12,80018,855peak 18,85518 Aug16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 952 +0 1 Sept14 Sept · 2 observations
952952peak 9521 Sept14 Sept
18,855Peak Premier in tracked matches
952Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 952
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 550 below peak (18,855)
  • +5,150 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,695 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate53.2%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.1%11.2%12.0%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.730.991.020.29 short
Match win rate42.2%43.9%44.7%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMambopeekFACEITLevel 4 · 952 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,305 · Purple bandPEAK ELO952csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55414Last 10055%Win rateLLLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 672ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time644ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · vertigo, 31 Aug
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 2 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · mirage, 15 Sept
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
82In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29171259%0.01
dust2A2213959%0.01
infernoS1711665%0.01
nukeD1441029%-0.00
ancientS64267%0.02
anubis43175%-0.01
cache42250%0.00
vertigo21150%0.05
debris1010%0.10
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,232Lifetime kills
0.73K/D
3,731Matches
42.2%Match win rate
53.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
7,023MVPs
7,470Hours (in match)
4,266Bombs planted
1,130Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,349
AWP2,416
MAC-101,868
MP91,697
FAMAS1,004

Lifetime map wins

8,090dust2
4,667inferno
3,916nuke
1,001vertigo
590train
105office
40italy
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,138Matches
48%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
75.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage33248%1.0215.1
Dust226047%0.9914.4
Inferno16552%0.9614.8
Ancient13247%0.9815.8
Anubis8351%1.0014.9
Nuke7553%1.0515.2
Overpass5048%0.9214.0
Cache2050%1.0516.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
672msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
39.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
6.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4638 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.528% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
debris4–90.1024%17 Sept
dust22–13-0.0543%17 Sept
train4–130.0131%17 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0221%17 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0930%16 Sept
dust28–13-0.0420%16 Sept
dust213–110.0532%15 Sept
mirage3–00.0029%15 Sept
inferno9–30.1124%15 Sept
inferno4–9-0.259%15 Sept
nuke8–8-0.1113%15 Sept
mirage8–130.0121%15 Sept
dust213–90.0731%14 Sept
anubis13–70.0332%13 Sept
inferno9–70.1230%11 Sept
inferno13–60.0931%11 Sept
ancient13–70.0318%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0324%11 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0521%10 Sept
dust213–8-0.0315%10 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0228%10 Sept
dust213–70.0522%10 Sept
cache13–5-0.0136%9 Sept
mirage13–80.0331%9 Sept
mirage10–130.0231%8 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0229%8 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0432%8 Sept
inferno9–40.0110%7 Sept
inferno9–70.0929%7 Sept
inferno9–10.0010%7 Sept
inferno9–30.0717%7 Sept
nuke9–20.0815%6 Sept
inferno9–20.0715%6 Sept
inferno6–9-0.0228%6 Sept
nuke9–130.0533%6 Sept
mirage13–50.0730%6 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0918%4 Sept
vertigo6–9-0.0517%4 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0226%4 Sept
dust213–30.0014%4 Sept
cache13–9-0.0113%4 Sept
mirage7–130.1432%4 Sept
dust216–14-0.0229%4 Sept
dust213–16-0.0134%4 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0218%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0439%3 Sept
mirage13–100.0447%2 Sept
dust213–70.1126%2 Sept
mirage13–100.0338%2 Sept
ancient13–70.0626%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0133%2 Sept
nuke13–20.0941%1 Sept
dust213–110.0641%1 Sept
mirage13–90.0330%1 Sept
vertigo13–90.1538%31 Aug
cache13–160.0028%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0245%31 Aug
mirage8–130.0428%31 Aug
dust211–13-0.0315%31 Aug
nuke3–8-0.0530%31 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0030%30 Aug
dust24–13-0.0223%30 Aug
dust213–50.0920%30 Aug
inferno3–9-0.170%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0316%28 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0118%28 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0328%28 Aug
nuke4–13-0.068%27 Aug
mirage15–150.0211%27 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0328%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0120%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0424%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0314%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0618%25 Aug
mirage13–100.1227%24 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0415%24 Aug
dust213–40.1126%24 Aug
dust213–60.0126%24 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0622%24 Aug
dust213–80.0326%23 Aug
nuke9–60.1320%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0414%23 Aug
inferno13–90.1025%23 Aug
mirage0–10-0.056%23 Aug
inferno9–5-0.1042%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0621%23 Aug
mirage13–40.0625%23 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0219%21 Aug
inferno16–130.1125%21 Aug
dust210–130.0316%20 Aug
ancient16–140.1115%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0016%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0616%20 Aug
ancient12–6-0.0017%19 Aug
cache15–150.0319%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0027%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0120%19 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0121%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0419%18 Aug
inferno6–130.0412%18 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →