ライスシャワーPeek

ライスシャワーPeek — CS2 Stats

AW76561199876736150[U:1:1916470422]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

101Tracked matches66%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,567Light Blue band · top ~66.5% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+292Premier CS Rating · 7,275 → 7,567
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 18 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,567 -1,934 14 Jun17 Sept · 16 days played
6,4029,773peak 9,77314 Jun17 Sept
9,773Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2025-07-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,206 below peak (9,773)
  • +1,165 over 30 days · improving
  • -2,206 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,433 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGライスシャワーPeekPREMIER7,567 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateWLWWWWLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time661ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy32.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 31.8% → last ⅓ avg 32.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 4 Feb
68%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 4 Feb
422msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 4 Feb
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA24141058%0.03
infernoB20101050%0.08
dust2A1911858%0.03
nukeA127558%0.05
ancientD62433%0.00
vertigoS65183%0.00
overpass32167%0.00
cache21150%-0.00
anubis220100%0.02
warden110100%0.07
italy110100%-0.06
poseidon1010%0.06
office1010%0.02
train1010%0.00
agency1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.1%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
682msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
5.55HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7208% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0625%17 Sept
inferno5–9-0.0967%17 Sept
inferno9–40.1821%7 Sept
inferno9–7-0.0229%7 Sept
inferno9–10.3716%7 Sept
inferno9–30.1242%7 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0046%6 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0140%6 Sept
dust215–150.0121%6 Sept
dust29–130.0629%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0328%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0847%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0427%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0529%25 Aug
dust213–90.0432%23 Aug
mirage13–60.1033%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0322%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0223%22 Aug
dust213–30.0837%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0222%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0042%19 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0825%16 Aug
ancient9–00.0160%12 Aug
mirage13–00.0718%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0230%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0533%30 Jul
dust213–50.1052%27 Jul
mirage13–20.0429%26 Jul
dust213–70.0532%26 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0442%26 Jul
ancient4–130.0227%26 Jul
cache13–70.0722%26 Jul
nuke13–70.0727%26 Jul
mirage13–40.0440%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0834%26 Jul
dust25–130.0231%26 Jul
nuke14–160.0425%23 Jul
ancient11–130.0934%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0814%12 Jul
inferno13–40.0325%12 Jul
overpass4–130.0122%4 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0326%29 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0326%28 Jun
dust210–130.0651%27 Jun
nuke13–60.0824%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0026%25 Jun
ancient0–3-0.0433%25 Jun
dust20–13-0.0718%16 Jun
nuke13–110.0436%14 Jun
inferno13–80.1741%14 Jun
anubis13–20.0123%14 May
mirage0–3-0.060%9 May
mirage8–130.0438%2 May
mirage13–50.1424%2 May
ancient13–11-0.0217%24 Apr
dust213–10.1439%24 Apr
dust26–130.0230%18 Apr
mirage13–70.0447%18 Apr
mirage9–130.0422%18 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0844%3 Apr
dust24–13-0.0853%1 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0433%1 Apr
vertigo10–10.0413%29 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0128%29 Mar
dust213–10.0831%29 Mar
nuke10–130.0535%24 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.0123%14 Feb
vertigo13–4-0.0233%14 Feb
inferno13–40.1034%13 Feb
mirage9–130.0629%13 Feb
mirage13–40.0256%12 Feb
dust213–70.0738%12 Feb
inferno3–90.0329%12 Feb
vertigo9–60.0062%12 Feb
dust213–2-0.0219%12 Feb
dust213–100.0835%12 Feb
inferno6–130.0431%12 Feb
anubis13–50.0316%11 Feb
dust213–110.0929%10 Feb
warden13–20.0719%5 Feb
italy13–9-0.0629%5 Feb
inferno8–80.0532%4 Feb
vertigo9–50.0330%4 Feb
inferno5–9-0.0641%4 Feb
inferno7–9-0.0447%4 Feb
inferno9–10.3025%4 Feb
inferno9–10.3768%4 Feb
poseidon8–80.0622%4 Feb
inferno4–9-0.0330%4 Feb
nuke9–50.1128%22 Oct
vertigo9–7-0.0438%22 Oct
inferno9–4-0.0337%22 Oct
nuke9–70.0326%22 Oct
inferno7–90.0617%22 Oct
nuke13–50.1426%20 Jul
mirage12–40.0223%19 Jul
office11–130.0221%18 Jul
train11–130.0033%18 Jul
agency5–130.0018%18 Jul
overpass13–40.0430%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →