Palette

Palette — CS2 Stats

ES76561198346064375[U:1:385798647]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,126Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,262Hours in CS42Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,977 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,977 → 1,977
+60Tracked matches · now 3,126
−1.6ppWin rate · 48.3% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 2 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,073 -539 2 Feb9 Jun · 17 days played
20,32521,836peak 21,8362 Feb9 Jun
22,078Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,977Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-02-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,977
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 24 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.4%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy13.2%13.2%13.7%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.09above
Match win rate49.7%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPaletteFACEITLevel 9 · 1,977 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,977csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning59
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.9
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time613ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 17 Sept
56%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · poseidon, 1 May
430msFastest reaction time · 12–16 · inferno, 17 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 13 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30131743%0.02
infernoC2081240%0.00
nukeA2011955%0.02
ancientA95456%-0.01
anubisC83538%0.01
mirageA85363%-0.01
overpass32167%0.01
poseidon110100%0.14
cache110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,398Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,720Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
52.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13.2%Shot accuracy
9,718MVPs
2,048Hours (in match)
5,103Bombs planted
1,382Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,859
AWP7,059
MP92,684
Knife2,191
MAC-102,103

Lifetime map wins

11,014dust2
10,550inferno
5,746nuke
5,050vertigo
954train
74office
37cbble
6lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,218Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
75.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218853%1.1615.5
Inferno18850%1.0213.8
Ancient12053%1.1115.7
Nuke11657%1.1115.6
Anubis9450%1.0815.3
Vertigo6245%0.9815.3
Mirage3040%0.9011.2
Train2839%0.9815.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
590msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
9.32HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0862% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0322%17 Sept
dust28–130.1311%17 Sept
dust213–40.2223%17 Sept
inferno12–160.0926%17 Sept
dust213–9-0.0129%16 Sept
inferno4–130.0924%15 Sept
inferno10–130.0418%15 Sept
dust213–11-0.0019%13 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0222%13 Sept
nuke13–70.0328%13 Sept
ancient13–90.0821%10 Sept
dust28–13-0.0422%10 Sept
dust213–50.0224%9 Sept
inferno13–100.0419%9 Sept
nuke11–130.0123%9 Sept
inferno10–130.0128%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0925%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0128%2 Sept
dust24–13-0.0125%2 Sept
dust27–13-0.0612%31 Aug
dust213–7-0.0719%31 Jul
dust26–130.0629%24 Jul
anubis13–80.1015%23 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0424%23 Jul
nuke11–130.0418%23 Jul
dust27–130.0822%15 Jul
mirage13–50.0237%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0226%15 Jul
nuke13–40.0121%15 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0712%9 Jun
nuke13–80.0125%9 Jun
dust29–13-0.0320%9 Jun
anubis13–50.0217%1 Jun
dust216–140.0422%1 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0033%27 May
nuke11–13-0.0022%27 May
overpass13–80.0616%27 May
anubis10–130.0319%27 May
inferno13–16-0.0421%1 May
poseidon9–30.1456%1 May
nuke15–150.0721%1 May
dust28–130.0227%28 Apr
mirage13–110.0327%28 Apr
dust213–70.0512%25 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0824%25 Apr
inferno13–70.0418%25 Apr
cache13–70.0624%25 Apr
dust213–60.0741%25 Apr
nuke13–70.0421%24 Apr
dust210–130.1016%24 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0933%24 Apr
nuke16–120.0225%24 Apr
nuke13–110.0522%24 Apr
dust211–130.0930%23 Apr
mirage13–100.0022%23 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0116%23 Apr
nuke13–70.0618%22 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0418%22 Apr
dust27–13-0.0222%22 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0516%22 Apr
inferno13–70.0111%24 Mar
overpass6–13-0.029%24 Mar
nuke13–70.0418%24 Mar
nuke16–120.0819%13 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0131%13 Mar
dust27–13-0.0319%3 Mar
overpass13–90.0013%3 Mar
nuke14–160.0221%27 Feb
ancient13–160.0119%13 Feb
nuke16–12-0.0116%13 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0224%13 Feb
dust213–20.0640%13 Feb
inferno13–70.0020%10 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0029%10 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0125%10 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0322%7 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0319%7 Feb
inferno13–160.0112%6 Feb
dust213–110.0530%6 Feb
inferno14–160.0122%6 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0218%6 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0712%6 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0417%5 Feb
ancient13–40.0018%5 Feb
dust27–13-0.0416%5 Feb
anubis13–6-0.0222%5 Feb
dust29–130.0416%5 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0520%5 Feb
dust210–130.0625%5 Feb
ancient13–90.0720%5 Feb
anubis9–130.0326%5 Feb
dust28–13-0.0523%5 Feb
dust25–13-0.0626%5 Feb
inferno13–90.0319%4 Feb
dust216–13-0.0324%4 Feb
dust213–90.0218%4 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0321%4 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0016%4 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0215%3 Feb
mirage13–50.0018%2 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →