Miggum

Miggum — CS2 Stats

DK76561198344815168[U:1:384549440]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

284Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
958Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.1 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 2 · 614 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 284 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 16 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,627 +999 5 Jun28 Jun · 5 days played
4,6286,453peak 6,4535 Jun28 Jun
Faceit ELO: 614 +0 5 Sept19 Sept · 2 observations
614614peak 6145 Sept19 Sept
6,453Peak Premier in tracked matches
614Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-05-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 614
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate47.4%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy6.2%12.6%12.2%6.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.860.950.980.12 short
Match win rate39.8%42.5%43.3%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMiggumFACEITLevel 2 · 614 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPEAK ELO614csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning49
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44479Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −7.6pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility4.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.9
Utility4.4
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time609ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 13 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 19 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · ancient, 27 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2271532%-0.05
ancientC1771041%-0.05
dust2A169756%-0.04
nukeA169756%-0.03
mirageB157847%-0.04
cacheA53260%-0.02
anubis42250%-0.05
overpass3030%-0.10
vertigo2020%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,459Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
1,444Matches
39.8%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
6.2%Shot accuracy
4,080MVPs
2,168Hours (in match)
1,097Bombs planted
262Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,026nuke
1,384inferno
789dust2
731vertigo
179train
108cbble
67lake
34office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
36%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
60.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1735%0.8210.8
Nuke1118%0.599.0
Anubis667%0.7613.0
Inferno40%0.6610.8
Ancient367%0.6610.3
Dust2333%0.9214.0
Train250%0.5113.0
Overpass1100%0.578.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
64.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
572msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.37HE damage / grenade
9.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3613% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4585 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.635% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0615%17 Sept
nuke13–5-0.017%17 Sept
dust25–13-0.078%17 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0612%17 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0519%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.088%15 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0313%15 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0813%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0718%13 Sept
ancient9–130.0034%13 Sept
dust24–13-0.0426%13 Sept
dust213–1-0.060%13 Sept
inferno13–5-0.049%30 Jul
inferno3–9-0.2013%28 Jul
vertigo5–11-0.0721%24 Jul
mirage6–11-0.0118%19 Jul
inferno5–13-0.029%19 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0418%19 Jul
ancient3–13-0.11100%19 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0510%17 Jul
ancient2–13-0.086%17 Jul
dust22–13-0.0710%17 Jul
inferno4–9-0.1424%17 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0517%17 Jul
inferno4–9-0.175%17 Jul
inferno9–30.0511%17 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0714%13 Jul
nuke9–20.1911%13 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1914%13 Jul
inferno3–90.0417%13 Jul
inferno9–50.0821%13 Jul
inferno4–90.0013%13 Jul
inferno5–90.0911%13 Jul
ancient10–130.0216%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.0413%12 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0212%12 Jul
nuke13–60.019%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0515%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.019%9 Jul
inferno13–160.0316%9 Jul
dust213–7-0.052%8 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0110%8 Jul
ancient13–7-0.033%6 Jul
inferno9–7-0.027%6 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0713%5 Jul
dust213–11-0.0716%5 Jul
cache13–7-0.044%5 Jul
ancient13–9-0.036%4 Jul
nuke6–13-0.046%4 Jul
ancient13–9-0.096%4 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0213%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0216%3 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0222%3 Jul
dust213–50.0320%3 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0212%3 Jul
cache13–50.079%3 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0710%2 Jul
cache13–20.0021%2 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0911%2 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0829%2 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0213%29 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0327%28 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0711%28 Jun
cache7–13-0.1212%28 Jun
dust213–3-0.0416%28 Jun
dust213–3-0.0211%28 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0610%28 Jun
ancient6–2-0.0310%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.057%27 Jun
dust212–12-0.056%25 Jun
ancient12–12-0.0513%25 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0613%23 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0814%18 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0412%18 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0721%16 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0110%16 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0925%10 Jun
mirage10–13-0.067%10 Jun
inferno3–13-0.100%6 Jun
dust213–11-0.0526%6 Jun
mirage13–80.0234%6 Jun
vertigo7–9-0.0722%5 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0817%5 Jun
mirage12–12-0.098%5 Jun
dust22–13-0.0710%5 Jun
dust213–50.1012%5 Jun
nuke8–8-0.0415%5 Jun
inferno3–9-0.156%5 Jun
overpass4–9-0.186%5 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0620%4 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0311%4 Jun
inferno9–7-0.0910%30 May
nuke13–10-0.0616%30 May
overpass12–12-0.1020%30 May
dust213–11-0.0220%30 May
mirage13–11-0.0310%24 May
nuke7–9-0.096%17 May
mirage7–13-0.0512%16 May
nuke13–11-0.0620%16 May
cache8–13-0.0121%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →