soren

soren — CS2 Stats

76561198336537957[U:1:376272229]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,122Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,011Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,522 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (42 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,122 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

1,522Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,522
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 9 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Oct 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 18 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.7%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy7.1%13.0%13.2%6.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.061.070.09 short
Match win rate46.6%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsorenFACEITLevel 8 · 1,522 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,522csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning48
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateWLLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +75ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.8
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time617ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 22 Aug →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 21 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 15 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3317–1652%-0.03
anubisA2112–957%-0.01
dust2C166–1038%-0.04
infernoS1611–569%-0.01
ancientA95–456%-0.02
cache—43–175%-0.01
nuke—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,525Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,305Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
56.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
7.1%Shot accuracy
2,066MVPs
1,011Hours (in match)
908Bombs planted
275Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,331inferno
1,087dust2
323nuke
221vertigo
173train
42office
13italy
3aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

298Matches
53%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
68.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8251%0.8612.7
Inferno6655%0.9413.8
Anubis4762%0.9813.4
Ancient4250%0.9014.8
Dust22843%0.8211.5
Overpass1662%1.0212.6
Cache1060%0.9713.7
Nuke520%0.8012.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
613msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
4.64HE damage / grenade
12.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4927 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4822% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0713%22 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0922%22 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0123%22 Aug →
inferno13–30.0419%22 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0222%15 Aug →
inferno9–130.0623%15 Aug →
ancient4–130.0324%15 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0325%12 Aug →
cache11–10.0615%12 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0016%12 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0115%12 Aug →
anubis11–130.0629%12 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0433%12 Aug →
mirage4–7-0.0118%30 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.1012%30 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0014%30 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0318%30 Jul →
dust28–13-0.1023%30 Jul →
anubis9–130.0122%29 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0116%29 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0413%29 Jul →
mirage13–160.0226%29 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0115%28 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0720%28 Jul →
inferno13–100.0214%28 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0723%28 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0024%28 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0112%28 Jul →
mirage8–130.0121%28 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0223%28 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0611%28 Jul →
dust21–13-0.1310%28 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0318%25 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0224%25 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0025%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.087%25 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0220%24 Jul →
anubis13–60.0118%24 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0520%24 Jul →
inferno15–19-0.0117%24 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0130%24 Jul →
mirage13–100.0117%23 Jul →
anubis14–160.0013%23 Jul →
dust213–110.0218%23 Jul →
anubis13–70.0221%23 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.046%23 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0610%23 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0114%23 Jul →
mirage19–17-0.0421%22 Jul →
dust213–20.0032%22 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0519%22 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0522%22 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.107%22 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0115%21 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0839%21 Jul →
ancient19–17-0.0314%21 Jul →
mirage13–60.0135%21 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.1111%21 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0515%21 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0216%21 Jul →
anubis0–9-0.0213%21 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0016%20 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0234%20 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0321%20 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0323%20 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0411%20 Jul →
anubis13–80.0323%20 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0217%20 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.094%20 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0420%20 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0123%20 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0415%20 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0711%20 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0512%20 Jul →
inferno13–40.0414%20 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0722%18 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0411%18 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.1116%18 Jul →
inferno5–130.0131%18 Jul →
mirage10–40.0733%15 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0328%15 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0218%15 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0313%14 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0319%14 Jul →
ancient13–100.0211%14 Jul →
anubis5–10.019%14 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0520%14 Jul →
anubis13–30.0216%14 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0623%14 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0433%14 Jul →
mirage16–140.0113%14 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0221%14 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0518%14 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0018%14 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0414%14 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0210%14 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0314%14 Jul →
mirage13–20.0135%13 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0129%13 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0423%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.