Meat

Meat — CS2 Stats

US76561198335849253[U:1:375583525]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,688Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,060Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,212Blue band · top ~37.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 803 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1673Premier CS Rating · 14,885 → 13,212
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,212 -3,295 24 Jul21 Sept · 20 days played
13,21216,507peak 16,50724 Jul21 Sept
16,507Peak Premier in tracked matches
803Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 803
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 98 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,295 below peak (16,507)
  • -2,981 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,788 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate41.8%41.3%41.9%meets
Shot accuracy4.7%12.6%12.2%7.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.910.950.980.07 short
Match win rate42.3%42.5%43.3%0.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMeatFACEITLevel 2 · 803 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER13,212 · Blue bandPEAK ELO803csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning56
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41536Last 10041%Win rateLLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 416 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility3.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.6
Utility3.9
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time589ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 18 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 28 Jul
398msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · office, 28 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 20 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L7Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB20101050%-0.01
ancientC145936%-0.02
infernoD112918%-0.02
officeA106460%-0.03
nukeD93633%-0.03
cacheC83538%-0.03
dust2C73443%-0.02
anubisA74357%-0.01
vertigoA53260%-0.01
train41325%-0.03
overpass31233%-0.10
shelter2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,413Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,414Matches
42.3%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
4.7%Shot accuracy
7,754MVPs
1,697Hours (in match)
3,643Bombs planted
1,317Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,858
MP76,340
SG 5532,149
MAC-101,638
MP91,586
FAMAS1,441

Lifetime map wins

7,057nuke
5,090inferno
4,240dust2
3,268vertigo
2,354train
880office
44italy
15lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
45%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
69.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3946%0.8912.9
Anubis2741%0.7112.4
Ancient2631%0.8813.3
Inferno2357%0.8213.4
Dust22138%0.7912.9
Nuke1856%0.9814.3
Train956%0.7813.3
Vertigo560%1.0913.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
14.2°Preaim
587msReaction time
56.0%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
7.84HE damage / grenade
5.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 14.2027° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.036%21 Sept
mirage8–130.0313%21 Sept
inferno4–13-0.046%21 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0714%21 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0615%19 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0119%18 Sept
inferno11–130.0211%18 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0222%18 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0228%18 Sept
ancient7–13-0.048%18 Sept
dust210–130.0115%15 Sept
cache5–13-0.0613%15 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0117%15 Sept
office7–13-0.0310%14 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0333%14 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0418%14 Sept
nuke13–60.018%13 Sept
ancient11–130.0216%13 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0418%13 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0213%11 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0225%11 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0015%10 Sept
inferno11–130.0019%10 Sept
mirage13–160.0318%10 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0118%8 Sept
vertigo10–70.014%8 Sept
office13–4-0.0314%8 Sept
cache12–12-0.0217%7 Sept
anubis13–40.0625%7 Sept
mirage12–12-0.068%7 Sept
office13–9-0.0910%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.0524%6 Sept
ancient13–40.0114%6 Sept
mirage8–130.0012%5 Sept
anubis4–130.0320%4 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0113%4 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0419%4 Sept
cache3–13-0.0629%3 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0617%3 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0615%2 Sept
ancient11–130.0318%1 Sept
office9–13-0.0019%1 Sept
dust213–7-0.0720%31 Aug
office5–13-0.0621%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.076%30 Aug
cache13–30.0414%30 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0510%30 Aug
mirage13–11-0.039%30 Aug
office11–130.008%28 Aug
office13–11-0.0215%28 Aug
office13–40.0115%28 Aug
vertigo13–100.0614%26 Aug
overpass13–11-0.0816%26 Aug
office13–4-0.0310%26 Aug
overpass9–13-0.115%25 Aug
train12–120.027%24 Aug
anubis13–11-0.036%21 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0512%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.067%20 Aug
nuke9–130.0212%19 Aug
mirage13–80.0916%18 Aug
cache13–9-0.0416%17 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.055%16 Aug
office13–10-0.0622%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0621%15 Aug
overpass12–12-0.1012%15 Aug
vertigo13–3-0.0714%15 Aug
train1–13-0.1014%14 Aug
train0–6-0.0325%14 Aug
mirage9–1-0.0611%14 Aug
anubis3–130.0012%5 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0219%4 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0023%4 Aug
shelter10–13-0.0211%4 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0217%4 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0313%4 Aug
inferno10–130.028%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.0520%2 Aug
shelter10–13-0.0112%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0624%1 Aug
dust215–15-0.0315%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0638%28 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0326%25 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0718%24 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0621%23 Jul
mirage16–12-0.045%21 Jul
dust213–7-0.0322%21 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0025%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0220%20 Jul
dust213–20.0816%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0015%20 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0319%13 Jul
inferno10–130.0011%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.057%13 Jul
mirage13–50.0811%11 Jul
train13–4-0.0210%11 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0116%11 Jul
inferno2–11-0.1215%11 Jul
cache13–10-0.0319%9 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0113%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →