𝔉𝔬𝔠𝔲𝔰𝔢𝔇 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198329867011[U:1:369601283]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,922Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,558Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,666Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31984 of 225801 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,773 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,666 → 23,666

0Faceit ELO · 1,773 → 1,773

+12Tracked matches · now 2,922

0.0ppWin rate · 46.4% → 46.4%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 2 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,666 +2,359 4 May – 29 Aug · 22 days played

24,309Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,773Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

58Days played since 2026-05-02

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,773
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 228 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

643 below peak (24,309)
+1,108 over 30 days · improving
+644 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,334 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	46.0%	48.3%	51.0%	5.0% short
Shot accuracy	12.5%	13.2%	13.7%	1.2% short
Kill/death ratio	1.22	1.07	1.09	above
Match win rate	45.0%	46.9%	48.4%	3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning42

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

4–5–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

9–9–2 · 45% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.3

Utility3.7

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning4.2

Utility3.7

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time534ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms

Headshot accuracy17.5%+2.0%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · overpass, 3 May →

32%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · overpass, 30 Jul →

391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 14 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · ancient, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 42% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	11–15	42%	0.01
ancient	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
nuke	S	16	11–5	69%	0.02
cache	A	15	9–6	60%	0.01
dust2	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
overpass	S	7	5–2	71%	0.05
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.02
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

137,439Lifetime kills

1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players

6,418Matches

45.0%Match win rate

46.0%Headshot %

12.5%Shot accuracy

14,988MVPs

2,758Hours (in match)

8,145Bombs planted

1,848Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,060

M4A4 / M4A1-S26,614

P2000 / USP-S8,426

AWP8,273

Glock-185,964

Desert Eagle3,521

MAC-103,332

P2503,144

MP92,901

FAMAS2,820

Lifetime map wins

10,166nuke

7,914inferno

3,281dust2

2,462cbble

2,365train

1,493vertigo

597office

564lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,254Matches

51%Win rate

1.23Avg K/D

78.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	159	53%	1.14	15.2
Nuke	97	59%	1.19	17.0
Inferno	67	45%	1.11	15.9
Ancient	59	49%	1.08	15.9
Dust2	30	40%	0.95	13.6
Overpass	27	63%	1.04	14.4
Anubis	23	35%	0.89	13.9
Cache	10	60%	1.02	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

74.1%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

526msReaction time

35.2%T opening success

32.3%CT opening success

0.32Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

8.29HE damage / grenade

9.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3155 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.1664% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.01	10%	13 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.04	12%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	18%	12 Sept →
office	10–13	-0.06	17%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	18%	31 Aug →
cache	22–20	-0.03	19%	31 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	16%	30 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.02	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.05	15%	27 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.02	16%	26 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	17%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	19%	23 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.04	16%	22 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.06	27%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	11%	6 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	23%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.11	17%	5 Aug →
overpass	13–11	0.04	21%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	15%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	21%	3 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.04	17%	3 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.02	25%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	20%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.00	10%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	22%	1 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	10%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	7–5	-0.04	15%	31 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	21%	30 Jul →
overpass	7–13	0.12	32%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	13%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.06	11%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.03	14%	27 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.00	13%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	17%	23 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.00	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.01	10%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	30%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.01	17%	21 Jul →
nuke	12–7	0.07	16%	21 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.06	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	4%	17 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.01	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	16%	13 Jul →
nuke	2–13	0.03	20%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.00	10%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	11%	13 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	11%	12 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	15%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	17%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.11	19%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	20%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	16%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.02	18%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	11%	27 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	15%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	12%	24 Jun →
overpass	13–9	-0.00	11%	23 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.04	27%	18 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	-0.03	16%	15 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.01	15%	15 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.01	21%	10 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	15%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.04	18%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.03	16%	1 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	19%	31 May →
ancient	13–7	0.06	12%	31 May →
nuke	13–9	0.09	8%	30 May →
anubis	13–4	0.03	14%	30 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	6%	29 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	6%	29 May →
nuke	16–14	0.06	16%	28 May →
cache	13–11	0.03	15%	28 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	16%	27 May →
mirage	13–5	0.06	11%	27 May →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	10%	26 May →
ancient	10–13	0.04	13%	26 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	10%	25 May →
mirage	14–16	0.00	12%	24 May →
mirage	13–2	0.07	21%	24 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	15%	24 May →
ancient	13–8	0.00	18%	24 May →
overpass	15–15	-0.03	15%	23 May →
mirage	13–10	0.05	17%	23 May →
ancient	8–13	0.10	16%	23 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	17%	19 May →
overpass	13–8	0.11	15%	19 May →
cache	6–13	-0.06	23%	5 May →
ancient	9–13	0.02	19%	4 May →
cache	13–4	0.07	14%	3 May →
cache	13–7	0.06	24%	3 May →
overpass	13–4	0.13	24%	3 May →
nuke	13–7	0.01	23%	2 May →