snedward

snedward — CS2 Stats

SO76561198300045348[U:1:339779620]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,990Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,404Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+20Tracked matches · now 3,990
+6.9ppWin rate · 37.9% → 44.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 7 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,262 +1,249 7 Jun28 Jun · 5 days played
18,01319,262peak 19,2627 Jun28 Jun
19,262Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-06-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.5%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy22.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.311.061.07above
Match win rate32.8%46.3%46.9%14.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnedwardFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41518Last 10041%Win rateLLWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −6.7pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time596ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 17 Jun
37%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 23 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · overpass, 6 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2442017%-0.01
ancientA159660%-0.00
nukeB136746%-0.04
cacheC125742%-0.03
dust2A116555%-0.04
overpassA95456%-0.06
infernoD81713%-0.03
anubisS54180%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.20
debris1010%-0.10
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

576,222Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
16,882Matches
32.8%Match win rate
49.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
22.9%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 8 players
24,745MVPs
6,155Hours (in match)
8,452Bombs planted
2,645Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47127,501
AWP32,605
AUG20,202
Glock-1819,064
SG 55318,376
P25013,721
Galil AR13,118

Lifetime map wins

13,765inferno
5,643dust2
5,395nuke
3,002vertigo
2,388train
1,406cbble
392office
240lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,211Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.5ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5753%1.1415.9
Inferno5151%1.0816.4
Nuke4055%1.0816.8
Ancient2654%1.0717.1
Anubis1050%0.9216.1
Dust2333%0.7011.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
608msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
5.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8842% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–13-0.0715%17 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0715%17 Sept
cache13–10-0.015%16 Sept
dust27–13-0.0929%16 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0114%12 Sept
dust213–1-0.0113%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.057%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0821%12 Sept
inferno3–9-0.1311%6 Sept
poseidon7–9-0.2024%6 Sept
debris8–8-0.1012%6 Sept
nuke2–9-0.1814%6 Sept
overpass9–3-0.1112%6 Sept
vertigo9–6-0.0222%6 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0120%6 Sept
overpass13–110.0127%6 Sept
nuke13–50.0636%6 Sept
dust22–13-0.0625%6 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0033%5 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0320%5 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0124%30 Aug
dust25–13-0.0514%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0231%30 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0431%30 Aug
mirage12–12-0.078%28 Aug
cache16–13-0.0214%22 Aug
mirage3–130.0417%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0216%21 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0217%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0118%7 Aug
ancient13–90.0610%7 Aug
nuke13–60.0010%5 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0512%5 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0213%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0119%5 Aug
mirage8–130.0516%5 Aug
overpass13–110.0312%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0021%4 Aug
ancient8–13-0.067%4 Aug
mirage10–130.0110%4 Aug
cache6–13-0.0611%4 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0314%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.047%3 Aug
cache2–13-0.0120%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.039%3 Aug
overpass13–4-0.0020%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.109%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0318%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0319%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0414%30 Jul
overpass7–13-0.069%30 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0114%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0025%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0312%19 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0619%18 Jul
nuke13–11-0.1022%18 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0315%17 Jul
ancient13–40.0910%17 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0225%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0529%16 Jul
dust213–80.0113%15 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0135%13 Jul
cache13–9-0.0314%13 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0812%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0513%13 Jul
mirage12–12-0.069%9 Jul
overpass6–3-0.068%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0415%5 Jul
nuke13–40.0222%5 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0315%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0611%1 Jul
ancient13–60.0512%28 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0811%28 Jun
dust213–3-0.0114%28 Jun
ancient13–80.0321%28 Jun
dust213–5-0.0230%27 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0523%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0129%25 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0212%23 Jun
dust213–1-0.0320%23 Jun
inferno4–9-0.0537%23 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0215%22 Jun
ancient5–0-0.0323%22 Jun
cache13–7-0.0427%18 Jun
anubis13–60.0225%18 Jun
overpass8–13-0.076%17 Jun
inferno9–40.1119%17 Jun
overpass1–9-0.2215%17 Jun
cache2–13-0.076%17 Jun
anubis13–80.0213%17 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0014%16 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0523%16 Jun
cache12–12-0.0523%10 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0013%10 Jun
cache13–90.0619%10 Jun
overpass11–13-0.067%10 Jun
dust28–13-0.0221%10 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0512%8 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0512%7 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0517%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →