AnTeK

AnTeK — CS2 Stats

CC76561198322214138[U:1:361948410]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,532Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,761Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,807Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35040 of 261688 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,930 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,807 +1,275 24 Jul – 10 Nov · 50 days played
21,24023,807peak 23,80724 Jul10 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,930 +0 1 Sept – 14 Oct · 6 observations
1,9301,930peak 1,9301 Sept14 Oct
23,807Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,930Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,930
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 71 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,807
  • +1,171 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,819 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,193 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches6664+2
Win rate50%52%−2pp
K/D1.261.05+0.21
Headshot %41%41%−0pp

Measured 14 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; previous 12 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,553), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate42.2%48.2%50.9%8.7% short
Shot accuracy13.8%13.2%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio0.981.071.090.10 short
Match win rate45.4%46.9%48.4%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnTeKFACEITLevel 9 · 1,930 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,807 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,930csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning69
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.0
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.9
Utility4.0
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time593ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 10 Aug →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 12 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 29 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2716–1159%0.01
dust2B2111–1052%0.02
infernoS1913–668%0.02
nukeB137–654%0.01
cacheD102–820%-0.02
ancientD71–614%0.00
anubis—33–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

197,421Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
10,246Matches
45.4%Match win rate
42.2%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
24,313MVPs
4,175Hours (in match)
13,312Bombs planted
2,887Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,750
AWP19,195
MP94,352
FAMAS4,245
MAC-103,828

Lifetime map wins

18,788inferno
14,417dust2
7,172train
5,045nuke
4,979vertigo
1,326office
747cbble
156lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,345Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
80.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage52750%1.1016.2
Inferno43851%1.1616.7
Ancient37151%1.1416.6
Dust233147%1.0716.2
Nuke19352%1.1416.0
Train11657%1.1216.1
Anubis10335%0.9914.6
Overpass10046%1.0616.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
594msReaction time
60.3%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
11.17HE damage / grenade
3.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3251 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0529%10 Nov →
dust213–70.0816%6 Nov →
anubis13–60.1124%5 Nov →
mirage13–60.0213%4 Nov →
inferno8–130.0111%2 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0014%31 Oct →
ancient12–160.0415%31 Oct →
mirage13–110.0615%30 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.075%29 Oct →
dust213–90.0910%29 Oct →
dust214–160.0113%29 Oct →
mirage13–90.1217%26 Oct →
inferno13–50.0420%22 Oct →
cache5–13-0.046%21 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0210%21 Oct →
mirage15–190.0114%20 Oct →
inferno13–90.0318%18 Oct →
inferno13–60.0331%15 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0221%15 Oct →
mirage2–130.0213%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0513%14 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0215%9 Oct →
cache13–90.0221%8 Oct →
dust213–100.033%8 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0513%7 Oct →
nuke2–130.007%7 Oct →
dust27–130.0212%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.0128%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.0722%23 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.083%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0514%23 Sept →
nuke9–130.0222%22 Sept →
inferno13–110.0319%21 Sept →
cache0–8-0.0229%21 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0220%21 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0114%20 Sept →
ancient10–130.0114%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0118%16 Sept →
inferno15–150.0216%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0614%15 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0115%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0318%12 Sept →
mirage13–90.0216%12 Sept →
inferno13–70.0318%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0113%10 Sept →
nuke13–70.0112%10 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0112%10 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0519%9 Sept →
nuke13–30.0117%7 Sept →
dust213–80.0511%2 Sept →
cache16–130.0113%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0419%31 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0114%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0221%29 Aug →
ancient1–8-0.107%29 Aug →
mirage16–130.0110%26 Aug →
nuke13–110.0013%26 Aug →
mirage13–70.0017%24 Aug →
ancient10–130.0816%21 Aug →
inferno16–130.0315%21 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0222%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0116%20 Aug →
dust213–80.0415%19 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0117%19 Aug →
dust213–90.0013%19 Aug →
anubis13–50.0514%13 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0516%13 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0137%12 Aug →
inferno13–90.049%12 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0714%11 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0316%10 Aug →
inferno13–110.1230%10 Aug →
inferno11–130.0116%9 Aug →
mirage13–70.0511%8 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0319%8 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0821%8 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0118%8 Aug →
mirage13–50.0817%7 Aug →
dust25–130.0319%7 Aug →
inferno13–70.0116%7 Aug →
dust213–60.1017%6 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0019%5 Aug →
mirage13–50.0821%5 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0321%5 Aug →
inferno15–150.0111%4 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0615%4 Aug →
anubis13–30.0520%4 Aug →
dust211–130.0428%3 Aug →
inferno13–50.0522%3 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0310%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0020%1 Aug →
dust213–60.0320%1 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0117%1 Aug →
nuke15–150.0615%1 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0222%31 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0112%30 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0219%29 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0229%29 Jul →
mirage13–50.1113%28 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0515%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.