Barney

Barney — CS2 Stats

76561198320535638[U:1:360269910]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

508Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,581Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#43315 of 260011 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,032 +4,485 27 Jan – 27 Feb · 16 days played
18,54723,032peak 23,03227 Jan27 Feb
23,671Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-01-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate55.8%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy15.3%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.180.980.99above
Match win rate43.8%43.3%43.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBarneyFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning48
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLTTWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +85ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–2–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility4.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time599ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 30 Jan →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 28 Jan →
398msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 14 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 3 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3115–1648%0.01
mirageA2414–1058%0.03
dust2D165–1131%0.02
nukeS129–375%0.02
ancientA95–456%0.02
cache—42–250%-0.01
overpass—43–175%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,938Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1,899Matches
43.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
55.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 3 players
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
5,247MVPs
1,581Hours (in match)
1,157Bombs planted
582Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,821inferno
2,438dust2
675nuke
365train
198vertigo
134lake
92cbble
17ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
606msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
6.06HE damage / grenade
9.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7957% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–9-0.1315%3 May →
inferno8–8-0.1117%3 May →
mirage15–15-0.0715%3 May →
cache13–10.0828%3 May →
cache5–13-0.0521%2 May →
dust25–13-0.0328%2 May →
cache13–100.0219%2 May →
cache11–13-0.1011%2 May →
nuke13–10-0.0530%27 Apr →
mirage13–50.0231%2 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0933%25 Mar →
inferno9–6-0.028%9 Mar →
ancient13–70.0219%27 Feb →
nuke9–130.0410%27 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0630%19 Feb →
dust213–100.0520%19 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.154%15 Feb →
dust22–13-0.0131%14 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0417%14 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0219%14 Feb →
ancient13–60.0522%14 Feb →
mirage6–130.0721%14 Feb →
ancient13–60.0319%14 Feb →
nuke13–80.0723%14 Feb →
mirage13–70.1028%14 Feb →
mirage6–130.0119%14 Feb →
overpass13–110.0228%14 Feb →
dust213–30.0716%14 Feb →
mirage13–160.0324%13 Feb →
dust29–130.0224%13 Feb →
inferno13–110.0930%13 Feb →
dust210–130.0715%13 Feb →
mirage13–40.0817%13 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0326%11 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0314%11 Feb →
inferno2–9-0.150%10 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0036%10 Feb →
nuke2–00.0133%10 Feb →
mirage13–50.0617%10 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0322%8 Feb →
overpass4–13-0.0522%8 Feb →
mirage16–140.0620%8 Feb →
inferno7–130.0042%8 Feb →
nuke13–100.0023%8 Feb →
mirage13–90.0818%8 Feb →
overpass13–70.0520%7 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0010%7 Feb →
mirage13–70.0917%5 Feb →
nuke3–130.0520%5 Feb →
dust26–130.0925%3 Feb →
inferno7–9-0.0829%3 Feb →
inferno9–60.0535%3 Feb →
inferno8–8-0.0420%3 Feb →
inferno9–70.0928%3 Feb →
inferno2–9-0.1828%3 Feb →
inferno13–80.0921%3 Feb →
overpass13–30.0911%3 Feb →
nuke13–50.0520%3 Feb →
dust213–80.0524%3 Feb →
inferno6–130.0817%3 Feb →
dust213–60.1118%3 Feb →
dust210–130.0826%2 Feb →
inferno9–40.0719%2 Feb →
inferno9–30.1014%2 Feb →
nuke12–160.0328%31 Jan →
ancient13–100.0128%31 Jan →
mirage13–60.0325%31 Jan →
inferno6–9-0.0513%30 Jan →
inferno4–9-0.1422%30 Jan →
mirage9–130.0823%30 Jan →
inferno8–80.1120%30 Jan →
inferno9–30.1629%30 Jan →
inferno9–40.1519%30 Jan →
inferno9–70.0427%30 Jan →
inferno6–9-0.0219%30 Jan →
inferno9–7-0.0117%30 Jan →
inferno9–30.1722%30 Jan →
inferno9–40.0631%30 Jan →
inferno9–50.0817%30 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0217%29 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0232%28 Jan →
mirage2–13-0.0950%28 Jan →
inferno3–13-0.0820%28 Jan →
ancient13–70.0023%28 Jan →
dust213–110.0427%28 Jan →
inferno13–80.0818%28 Jan →
ancient13–160.0423%27 Jan →
nuke13–110.0230%27 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0624%27 Jan →
mirage13–30.0224%27 Jan →
mirage13–30.0624%25 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0326%25 Jan →
mirage11–130.0326%24 Jan →
ancient8–130.0223%23 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0113%23 Jan →
nuke13–80.0918%23 Jan →
mirage13–30.0915%23 Jan →
nuke13–8-0.0122%23 Jan →
mirage13–8-0.0113%22 Jan →
ancient7–130.0413%22 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.