b0talayar

b0talayar — CS2 Stats

GE76561198319063434[U:1:358797706]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,063Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,582Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,027Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#56726 of 261549 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+364Premier CS Rating · 21,663 → 22,027

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,027 -1,702 13 Sept – 14 Nov · 27 days played
21,66324,748peak 24,74813 Sept14 Nov
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,721 below peak (24,748)
  • -361 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,973 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches52102−50
Win rate52%46%+6pp
K/D1.141.10+0.04
Headshot %42%42%+0pp

Measured 13 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 13 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate40.4%46.9%49.3%8.9% short
Shot accuracy7.6%13.0%13.4%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.081.120.05 short
Match win rate47.4%46.7%48.5%1.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Red band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGb0talayarPREMIER22,027 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning71
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.3
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning7.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 26 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · anubis, 30 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 22 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 5 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD196–1332%0.01
mirageB179–853%0.01
cacheD155–1033%-0.00
nukeA159–660%0.02
dust2C156–940%0.02
ancientS118–373%0.02
infernoD62–433%0.02
rush_001—10–10%0.07
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,052Lifetime kills
1.07K/D
4,484Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
40.4%Headshot %
7.6%Shot accuracy
11,294MVPs
1,536Hours (in match)
3,965Bombs planted
1,249Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,715
AWP13,130
MP92,297
MAC-101,669
Tec-91,269

Lifetime map wins

12,670dust2
3,549inferno
2,014nuke
1,956vertigo
1,242train
773cbble
92office
76lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
50%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
95.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno250%1.0417.5
Ancient250%1.6521.0
Dust21100%0.8517.0
Nuke10%1.4021.0
Mirage10%1.1820.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
546msReaction time
60.6%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
8.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.1819% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0621%14 Nov →
cache8–130.0224%13 Nov →
anubis13–60.0520%13 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0413%13 Nov →
ancient7–130.0612%9 Nov →
ancient13–70.0116%9 Nov →
anubis7–130.0215%5 Nov →
mirage16–120.0124%5 Nov →
mirage13–20.0219%5 Nov →
mirage13–10.0711%5 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0115%5 Nov →
nuke7–130.0920%5 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0320%5 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0217%4 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.0315%4 Nov →
cache13–30.0316%4 Nov →
cache3–130.0234%3 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0026%1 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.048%27 Oct →
nuke13–50.1122%26 Oct →
mirage13–70.0116%26 Oct →
anubis9–130.0116%26 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0213%26 Oct →
ancient8–130.0117%26 Oct →
dust26–130.0224%26 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0116%26 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0014%25 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0216%23 Oct →
cache13–110.0112%23 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0118%23 Oct →
dust210–130.0335%22 Oct →
nuke13–50.0214%22 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0629%22 Oct →
ancient13–60.0527%22 Oct →
nuke13–110.0519%21 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0415%21 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0122%20 Oct →
ancient13–70.0418%20 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0117%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.016%18 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0215%18 Oct →
ancient13–100.0318%18 Oct →
dust213–70.0320%18 Oct →
cache7–130.0024%18 Oct →
inferno13–110.0315%16 Oct →
mirage15–150.0615%16 Oct →
nuke7–130.0120%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0313%16 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0418%16 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0414%13 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0415%13 Oct →
dust214–160.0516%13 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0214%12 Oct →
inferno3–130.1027%12 Oct →
dust213–80.0323%12 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0120%12 Oct →
mirage4–110.0319%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0626%12 Oct →
dust26–130.0030%11 Oct →
dust213–60.0618%11 Oct →
rush_0016–80.0715%11 Oct →
cache7–130.0020%11 Oct →
train5–13-0.0331%10 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0511%6 Oct →
anubis15–150.0713%6 Oct →
nuke11–40.0512%6 Oct →
dust213–160.0421%5 Oct →
dust27–130.0613%5 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0012%5 Oct →
anubis9–130.0213%5 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.049%3 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0530%3 Oct →
nuke13–20.0115%2 Oct →
dust212–10.0525%2 Oct →
anubis13–20.0813%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0126%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.052%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0019%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.0426%1 Oct →
anubis14–160.0215%1 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0113%1 Oct →
anubis2–10.0533%1 Oct →
anubis13–30.0237%30 Sept →
dust28–130.0023%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0231%30 Sept →
ancient16–130.0112%30 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0227%30 Sept →
inferno13–110.0415%30 Sept →
mirage13–110.0222%29 Sept →
anubis10–130.0324%29 Sept →
anubis13–60.0517%29 Sept →
nuke13–40.0712%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0413%29 Sept →
anubis11–130.0017%29 Sept →
cache6–130.0811%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0310%25 Sept →
cache13–100.0419%25 Sept →
cache5–130.0022%25 Sept →
mirage13–40.1010%25 Sept →
nuke13–90.0419%25 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.