venmar

venmar — CS2 Stats

CA76561198317585885[U:1:357320157]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,757Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,899Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,918Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33154 of 259084 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,304 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,918 -131 3 Sept – 30 Oct · 20 days played
23,76525,272peak 25,2723 Sept30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,304 +0 3 Sept – 4 Sept · 2 observations
1,3041,304peak 1,3043 Sept4 Sept
25,613Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,304Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,304
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 47 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,354 below peak (25,272)
  • -1,354 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,082 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate38.3%48.2%50.9%12.7% short
Shot accuracy15.1%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.08 short
Match win rate39.6%46.9%48.4%8.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvenmarFACEITLevel 9 · 1,304 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,918 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,304csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning68
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWTLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility4.1
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time525ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 30 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · mirage, 19 Oct →
172msFastest reaction time · 0–6 · mirage, 6 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 43% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%0.01
nukeB2210–1245%0.05
dust2B158–753%-0.00
ancientB105–550%0.04
cacheC73–443%0.02
infernoA74–357%-0.01
anubisA53–260%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.09
office—11–0100%0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.06
train—10–10%0.11
poseidon—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

122,157Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
5,727Matches
39.6%Match win rate
38.3%Headshot %
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13,118MVPs
2,372Hours (in match)
3,403Bombs planted
1,135Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,023
AWP24,444
P2503,267
SSG 082,551
Knife1,872
MP91,826

Lifetime map wins

14,988dust2
4,756inferno
3,193nuke
1,682train
949cbble
808vertigo
280office
261lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

533Matches
54%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
84.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13554%1.0116.0
Dust28759%1.0917.4
Ancient5054%1.0716.2
Inferno4652%1.1018.4
Nuke4450%1.0515.4
Anubis3647%1.1615.1
Overpass978%1.3317.7
Cache850%1.3421.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
44.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.6%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
527msReaction time
54.6%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
12.03HE damage / grenade
3.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4499 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0710%31 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0418%30 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0217%30 Oct →
ancient13–110.0613%30 Oct →
office13–110.0316%30 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.017%29 Oct →
ancient13–50.0427%29 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0217%29 Oct →
ancient5–130.0928%29 Oct →
cache11–130.0218%28 Oct →
mirage13–90.0214%28 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0321%27 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0217%27 Oct →
mirage13–20.0316%27 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0413%27 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0215%26 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0622%25 Oct →
nuke11–130.0312%22 Oct →
cache12–120.0319%21 Oct →
cache13–40.0712%20 Oct →
overpass8–130.0617%20 Oct →
ancient13–60.1620%19 Oct →
nuke13–90.1118%19 Oct →
mirage0–7-0.0550%19 Oct →
nuke13–20.0814%19 Oct →
mirage13–60.0418%19 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0113%19 Oct →
dust213–4-0.017%18 Oct →
overpass13–40.117%18 Oct →
mirage5–130.0411%18 Oct →
vertigo9–130.067%18 Oct →
ancient10–130.0618%18 Oct →
nuke5–130.0617%18 Oct →
dust213–11-0.039%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0115%15 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0312%15 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0315%14 Oct →
dust213–100.1416%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.038%13 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0518%12 Oct →
ancient13–60.0516%12 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0617%12 Oct →
nuke13–60.0620%11 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0018%11 Oct →
anubis13–00.1015%11 Oct →
nuke13–100.0116%10 Oct →
dust213–160.0125%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0213%10 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0111%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.077%9 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0313%9 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0319%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0415%9 Oct →
cache13–40.0211%9 Oct →
nuke13–110.0323%8 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0125%8 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0110%8 Oct →
anubis13–60.0216%8 Oct →
cache5–130.0414%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0116%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0116%7 Oct →
mirage10–130.0627%7 Oct →
inferno13–70.0622%6 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0222%6 Oct →
mirage0–6-0.0650%6 Oct →
nuke9–130.0412%6 Oct →
mirage13–100.0717%6 Oct →
anubis13–00.0510%6 Oct →
train7–130.1126%6 Oct →
dust213–11-0.1022%5 Oct →
nuke5–130.0515%5 Oct →
mirage12–120.0414%5 Oct →
inferno13–50.0314%5 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0220%4 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0124%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0720%4 Oct →
dust27–130.0126%4 Oct →
poseidon9–70.1021%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0211%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0211%3 Oct →
nuke3–10.0722%3 Oct →
cache9–13-0.037%2 Oct →
ancient13–80.0514%1 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0210%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.0814%30 Sept →
nuke13–60.1617%30 Sept →
mirage12–120.1423%30 Sept →
mirage8–130.0330%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.079%28 Sept →
nuke12–120.0928%26 Sept →
nuke7–130.0313%25 Sept →
nuke10–130.0814%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0313%25 Sept →
nuke12–120.1319%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0311%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.1425%23 Sept →
mirage5–130.0122%23 Sept →
mirage6–00.0225%23 Sept →
nuke6–130.0318%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0229%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.