Lo Siento Wilson

Lo Siento Wilson — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198312054796[U:1:351789068]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,204Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,207Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#12782 of 259681 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,105 +2,229 9 Dec – 28 Apr · 14 days played
22,99427,151peak 27,1519 Dec28 Apr
27,151Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2025-12-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning54
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time577ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 26 Dec →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · mirage, 6 Feb →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 9 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 27 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%0.03
infernoB209–1145%0.01
ancientS1711–665%0.02
cacheA127–558%0.03
dust2A74–357%0.01
anubisS64–267%0.03
overpassS64–267%0.05
nuke—41–325%-0.01
stronghold—10–10%0.09
warden—11–0100%-0.01
alpine—11–0100%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
agency—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

337,589Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
7,618Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
63.0%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
20.0%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
27,514MVPs
30,237Hours (in match)
5,470Bombs planted
5,263Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47166,972
AWP20,232
Knife3,180
SSG 082,511
UMP-452,453
MP92,362

Lifetime map wins

14,571inferno
10,693dust2
2,551train
2,438vertigo
1,876nuke
1,076cbble
192lake
165office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,135Matches
53%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
82.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3741%1.1717.1
Ancient2658%1.1817.7
Anubis1145%1.3119.3
Inferno1050%1.1017.0
Overpass5100%1.2615.8
Nuke3100%1.2819.0
Dust2367%1.3521.0
Train333%1.0918.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
585msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
12.97HE damage / grenade
9.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8046% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0318%30 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0111%27 Aug →
cache13–100.0826%16 Aug →
cache13–110.0328%6 Aug →
mirage11–130.0716%6 Aug →
ancient13–110.0617%6 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0423%6 Aug →
mirage3–130.0133%5 Aug →
mirage13–50.0124%26 Jul →
anubis1–130.0119%26 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0423%12 Jul →
cache13–70.0526%12 Jul →
mirage12–20.0823%8 Jul →
cache11–130.0210%7 Jul →
dust215–150.0421%28 Jun →
ancient11–130.0622%23 Jun →
cache12–120.0529%3 Jun →
cache13–100.1124%3 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0317%3 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0131%30 May →
dust25–13-0.0624%29 May →
cache13–110.0025%29 May →
cache11–130.0425%28 May →
cache13–11-0.0110%9 May →
ancient6–13-0.0514%8 May →
cache1–12-0.0415%2 May →
dust213–110.0217%28 Apr →
ancient16–140.0516%28 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0119%21 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0716%21 Apr →
ancient13–110.1320%28 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.1020%9 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0239%9 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0029%8 Feb →
inferno13–110.0426%7 Feb →
overpass5–130.0530%7 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0333%7 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0211%7 Feb →
anubis13–90.0431%7 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0325%7 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0224%6 Feb →
mirage13–20.067%6 Feb →
anubis13–80.0319%6 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.024%6 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0222%6 Feb →
mirage10–130.0143%6 Feb →
mirage6–130.0441%30 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0327%30 Jan →
mirage13–100.0121%30 Jan →
anubis7–130.0235%28 Jan →
inferno16–130.0422%28 Jan →
inferno13–100.0821%26 Jan →
anubis13–100.0526%26 Jan →
mirage13–110.0827%25 Jan →
stronghold3–130.0935%24 Jan →
warden13–10-0.0132%24 Jan →
alpine13–90.0133%24 Jan →
anubis13–80.0222%22 Jan →
inferno16–14-0.0015%18 Jan →
mirage11–130.0722%18 Jan →
inferno13–100.0315%18 Jan →
mirage13–60.1125%18 Jan →
inferno13–80.0718%18 Jan →
inferno13–70.0730%15 Jan →
inferno13–20.1023%7 Jan →
ancient13–60.1226%7 Jan →
dust213–50.0917%7 Jan →
overpass13–50.0938%6 Jan →
nuke10–130.0123%6 Jan →
inferno10–130.0130%2 Jan →
vertigo13–50.0420%2 Jan →
agency13–80.0431%2 Jan →
inferno1–13-0.0229%1 Jan →
overpass11–130.0218%1 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0423%28 Dec →
ancient16–13-0.0017%28 Dec →
inferno12–120.0840%28 Dec →
overpass13–100.1326%27 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0615%27 Dec →
mirage16–120.0718%27 Dec →
ancient16–120.0129%27 Dec →
ancient13–10.1425%27 Dec →
mirage13–20.1425%26 Dec →
nuke16–130.0122%16 Dec →
inferno8–13-0.0024%16 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0521%16 Dec →
mirage13–50.0831%14 Dec →
inferno15–150.0214%14 Dec →
nuke7–130.0120%14 Dec →
overpass13–100.0320%14 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.0318%14 Dec →
ancient12–160.0021%10 Dec →
mirage6–13-0.0218%10 Dec →
mirage4–13-0.0125%10 Dec →
overpass13–90.0023%10 Dec →
mirage15–150.0016%10 Dec →
dust24–130.0021%9 Dec →
ancient13–80.0120%9 Dec →
ancient10–13-0.0221%9 Dec →
dust213–1-0.0214%9 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.