Starspieler Anus

Starspieler Anus — CS2 Stats

KY76561198119677750[U:1:159412022]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,345Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 1,345
−4.2ppWin rate · 58.3% → 54.2%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,622 +3,265 1 Feb – 20 Oct · 26 days played
13,05017,704peak 17,7041 Feb20 Oct
17,704Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-02-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStarspieler AnusFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning46
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–42–8Last 10050%Win rateWWLLLTTLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 2–5–3 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 6–8–6 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time643ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%+6.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 3 Feb →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · cache, 25 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 31 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 13 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 39% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2811–1739%-0.02
cacheC2712–1544%-0.02
ancientA148–657%-0.01
infernoB137–654%0.03
anubisA74–357%-0.01
nukeA53–260%0.00
dust2—32–167%0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.01
poseidon—11–0100%0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

546Matches
49%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
65.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2343%0.6911.5
Ancient1856%0.7813.1
Anubis1553%0.7812.1
Inferno1030%0.8614.0
Nuke475%0.8612.0
Overpass475%0.7812.3
Cache2100%0.6610.0
Dust210%0.8310.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
637msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.48HE damage / grenade
9.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4733 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2838% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0231%1 Nov →
cache13–50.0520%1 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0411%31 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0616%31 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0429%7 Aug →
cache12–120.0018%7 Aug →
cache12–120.0025%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0732%25 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0531%25 Jul →
cache12–120.0057%25 Jul →
inferno13–80.0437%2 May →
cache4–13-0.0121%2 May →
cache12–120.0234%2 May →
cache12–120.0239%2 May →
cache2–13-0.0324%2 May →
cache13–4-0.0032%2 May →
cache13–5-0.0535%1 May →
cache12–120.0034%1 May →
cache13–10-0.0030%1 May →
cache4–130.0124%1 May →
cache13–11-0.0726%1 May →
cache13–8-0.0831%1 May →
cache13–11-0.0123%1 May →
cache13–6-0.0218%1 May →
cache13–8-0.0134%1 May →
cache13–6-0.0228%30 Apr →
cache9–13-0.0429%30 Apr →
cache13–4-0.0825%29 Apr →
cache5–13-0.0723%29 Apr →
cache5–13-0.0025%29 Apr →
cache13–70.0631%29 Apr →
ancient11–130.0019%31 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0116%19 Mar →
mirage13–60.0243%19 Mar →
anubis16–13-0.0417%8 Mar →
inferno13–70.1119%8 Mar →
mirage10–130.0418%8 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0421%7 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.1020%7 Mar →
mirage13–80.0522%7 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0618%1 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0930%1 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0321%1 Mar →
overpass13–90.0027%1 Mar →
inferno13–100.1123%28 Feb →
ancient13–110.0827%28 Feb →
anubis16–140.0830%28 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0323%28 Feb →
anubis13–70.0120%28 Feb →
ancient13–90.0321%28 Feb →
nuke13–90.0746%28 Feb →
mirage8–130.0324%28 Feb →
inferno16–13-0.0012%26 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0417%26 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0713%26 Feb →
inferno4–13-0.0528%26 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0720%25 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0818%25 Feb →
inferno7–130.0038%23 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0218%23 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0630%22 Feb →
mirage13–70.0524%22 Feb →
mirage14–160.0024%22 Feb →
inferno13–100.0423%22 Feb →
inferno13–80.1325%21 Feb →
inferno13–50.0921%21 Feb →
ancient13–100.0626%21 Feb →
inferno8–130.0353%18 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.0424%18 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0314%18 Feb →
nuke13–50.0120%17 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0632%15 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0715%15 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.067%13 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.088%13 Feb →
nuke7–130.0120%13 Feb →
mirage13–30.1025%13 Feb →
ancient13–60.0123%11 Feb →
mirage13–70.0030%11 Feb →
mirage9–130.0326%11 Feb →
ancient15–150.0216%11 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.139%9 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0430%9 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0124%9 Feb →
mirage13–60.0120%6 Feb →
dust213–80.0217%5 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0219%5 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0234%3 Feb →
dust213–60.0515%3 Feb →
poseidon9–20.2333%3 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0520%2 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0212%2 Feb →
anubis2–13-0.0912%2 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0929%2 Feb →
mirage13–80.0323%2 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.048%2 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0515%2 Feb →
ancient12–16-0.0126%1 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.089%1 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.027%1 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.