𝐇𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐤𝐮𝐤 — CS2 Stats

76561198877398420[U:1:917132692]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

952Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating24,575Top 25% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#27239 of 259692 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,575 → 24,575

+1Tracked matches · now 952

−3.7ppWin rate · 55.6% → 51.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,575 +0 16 Aug – 23 Oct · 2 days played

24,575Peak Premier in tracked matches

39Days played since 2026-01-06

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 24,575
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 425 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-10-23
Purple band first seen 2026-10-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning49

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–44–10Last 10046%Win rateLWLLTLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–3–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 30%
Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

4–4–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 32%
Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

7–11–2 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 32%
Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.0

Utility3.7

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch1.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning4.9

Utility3.7

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time538ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms

Headshot accuracy31.6%+7.2%

first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 31.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 21 Jan →

67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 13 Aug →

391msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · vertigo, 26 Jul →

13–2Biggest win · cache, 5 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	31	16–15	52%	0.02
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.02
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
vertigo	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.02
anubis	D	5	0–5	0%	0.02
inferno	S	5	4–1	80%	0.02
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	0.03
ancient	—	4	3–1	75%	0.03
warden	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
debris	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01
eldorado	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
stronghold	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

385Matches

54%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

88.9ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Cache	26	50%	1.21	17.6
Mirage	5	80%	1.07	17.6
Anubis	3	67%	2.59	15.7
Vertigo	3	67%	1.24	16.0
Ancient	2	0%	0.70	11.0
Nuke	1	100%	2.14	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.2%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

85.6%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

520msReaction time

38.7%T opening success

40.6%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

2.3%Flash assists

10.83HE damage / grenade

4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.6915% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	10–13	0.08	31%	24 Oct →
debris	9–4	-0.06	21%	2 Oct →
vertigo	0–9	-0.17	40%	2 Oct →
nuke	6–9	-0.07	19%	2 Oct →
eldorado	8–8	-0.06	37%	2 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.00	26%	30 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.01	28%	30 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.09	42%	30 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.06	46%	16 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	25%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.02	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.02	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	27%	16 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	67%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	31%	12 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	32%	12 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	20%	5 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	30%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	33%	26 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.00	43%	26 Jul →
eldorado	7–9	-0.07	30%	26 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.07	29%	26 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	45%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	21%	26 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.03	30%	25 Jul →
boulder	11–13	-0.02	29%	25 Jul →
fachwerk	13–10	0.02	35%	25 Jul →
shelter	8–13	0.08	27%	25 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.04	50%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	29%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	30%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	26%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.06	25%	11 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	23%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	33%	8 Jul →
mirage	12–2	-0.00	17%	8 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.05	38%	7 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.01	29%	5 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.07	48%	5 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	41%	4 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.06	35%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	28%	4 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	25%	30 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.03	26%	30 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.06	36%	29 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.02	22%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.05	35%	30 May →
dust2	5–13	0.02	64%	29 May →
cache	13–3	0.12	43%	29 May →
cache	11–13	-0.03	30%	29 May →
cache	13–11	0.04	48%	29 May →
cache	13–3	0.03	25%	11 May →
cache	12–12	0.03	26%	10 May →
cache	13–11	0.04	34%	10 May →
cache	13–11	-0.00	34%	9 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	50%	9 May →
cache	13–7	0.04	36%	8 May →
cache	2–8	-0.06	27%	7 May →
cache	13–6	0.05	47%	7 May →
cache	6–13	-0.04	28%	3 May →
cache	1–12	-0.04	21%	2 May →
mirage	12–12	0.01	20%	21 Apr →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	26%	21 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	31%	8 Mar →
warden	4–13	0.05	27%	8 Mar →
mirage	6–13	0.03	39%	30 Jan →
ancient	13–10	0.06	29%	30 Jan →
warden	9–13	-0.05	23%	25 Jan →
inferno	13–10	0.03	27%	25 Jan →
mirage	13–11	0.12	23%	25 Jan →
dust2	13–6	0.01	33%	25 Jan →
stronghold	3–13	-0.03	40%	24 Jan →
warden	13–10	0.02	25%	24 Jan →
alpine	13–9	0.04	17%	24 Jan →
nuke	9–0	0.24	21%	21 Jan →
inferno	6–9	-0.12	15%	21 Jan →
dust2	5–13	0.11	35%	21 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.03	24%	21 Jan →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	31%	20 Jan →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	39%	20 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.06	20%	20 Jan →
vertigo	11–13	0.03	38%	8 Jan →
mirage	5–13	0.05	16%	8 Jan →
inferno	13–2	0.10	20%	7 Jan →
ancient	13–6	0.07	23%	7 Jan →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	30%	7 Jan →
mirage	12–12	0.10	29%	7 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.01	19%	7 Jan →
mirage	12–12	-0.00	27%	7 Jan →
anubis	7–13	0.08	17%	7 Jan →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	13%	7 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.07	18%	7 Jan →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	20%	7 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	7 Jan →
mirage	13–6	0.03	15%	6 Jan →
vertigo	6–13	0.01	18%	6 Jan →
overpass	13–5	0.23	32%	6 Jan →
nuke	10–13	0.01	26%	6 Jan →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	28%	6 Jan →