Eichelgladiator

Eichelgladiator — CS2 Stats

76561198311380579[U:1:351114851]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,761Tracked matches62%Win rate2024Tracked since
3,085Hours in CS50Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating8,204Light Blue band · top ~63.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 969 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,204 +1,082 2 Oct – 28 Oct · 11 days played
6,8448,861peak 8,8612 Oct28 Oct
8,861Peak Premier in tracked matches
969Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-10-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 969
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 82 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 657 below peak (8,861)
  • +1,082 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,796 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate47.6%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy3.2%11.2%12.0%8.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.880.991.020.14 short
Match win rate42.1%43.9%44.7%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEichelgladiatorFACEITLevel 4 · 969 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER8,204 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO969csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning44
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–41–7Last 10052%Win rateWLWWWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −8.3pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time600ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy28.6%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–3 · poseidon, 2 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 23 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 14 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 15poseidonWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2011–955%0.03
poseidonD175–1229%0.02
dust2S1511–473%-0.01
nukeB115–645%-0.00
mirageC104–640%-0.01
ancientA106–460%-0.01
cacheS96–367%-0.01
anubis—42–250%-0.02
boulder—21–150%-0.03
fachwerk—10–10%-0.06
rush_001—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

51,503Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
3,539Matches
42.1%Match win rate
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3.2%Shot accuracy
7,021MVPs
1,153Hours (in match)
3,363Bombs planted
1,002Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,470
AWP5,865
MP91,342
SSG 081,152
MAC-101,119
MP71,099

Lifetime map wins

5,734nuke
5,645dust2
4,105inferno
704train
162vertigo
77lake
37ar_shoots
34safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

651Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
72.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217350%0.9314.1
Ancient13148%0.9013.5
Mirage12746%0.9013.5
Inferno7351%0.9014.1
Nuke5353%1.0715.0
Anubis4852%0.9414.7
Cache3060%0.8412.9
Overpass1050%0.8311.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
599msReaction time
43.0%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
10.17HE damage / grenade
16.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.6754% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.1023%3 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0424%3 Nov →
cache13–110.0136%3 Nov →
anubis13–80.0118%30 Oct →
dust222–18-0.0322%30 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0521%30 Oct →
inferno13–80.0535%30 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0313%29 Oct →
inferno8–80.0026%28 Oct →
dust210–130.0120%28 Oct →
mirage8–130.0425%28 Oct →
mirage8–130.0417%28 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0220%27 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0126%26 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.0639%23 Oct →
inferno9–70.1229%23 Oct →
inferno9–40.0227%23 Oct →
inferno8–80.0553%23 Oct →
inferno9–60.0667%23 Oct →
inferno9–70.0119%23 Oct →
poseidon9–60.1650%23 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0329%22 Oct →
ancient13–10.0330%22 Oct →
dust213–30.0727%22 Oct →
ancient13–60.0927%22 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0429%22 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0538%22 Oct →
dust213–20.0215%22 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0032%21 Oct →
mirage16–190.0220%21 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0322%21 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0234%21 Oct →
dust213–50.0430%21 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.0319%21 Oct →
dust213–60.0229%20 Oct →
nuke13–30.1618%20 Oct →
inferno13–70.0820%20 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0314%20 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0323%20 Oct →
poseidon1–9-0.2225%20 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0220%19 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0114%19 Oct →
mirage16–120.0010%19 Oct →
nuke16–120.0232%19 Oct →
fachwerk8–13-0.0627%19 Oct →
boulder13–5-0.0350%19 Oct →
dust213–11-0.067%18 Oct →
nuke22–200.0115%18 Oct →
poseidon9–60.1634%18 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0627%18 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0812%16 Oct →
rush_0017–30.050%16 Oct →
inferno16–140.0211%16 Oct →
ancient10–130.0023%15 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0050%15 Oct →
poseidon8–8-0.0723%15 Oct →
anubis13–50.0715%15 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0115%15 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.109%15 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.220%14 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0121%14 Oct →
nuke13–110.0229%14 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0415%13 Oct →
inferno13–60.0936%13 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0419%13 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0117%13 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1543%12 Oct →
inferno9–30.1727%12 Oct →
inferno9–40.2234%12 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0323%12 Oct →
ancient13–90.0520%12 Oct →
dust213–60.0323%12 Oct →
mirage13–60.0316%11 Oct →
nuke3–130.0219%11 Oct →
poseidon9–20.2111%9 Oct →
anubis3–12-0.0414%9 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0238%8 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.044%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.029%7 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0538%7 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.2019%7 Oct →
boulder7–13-0.0422%5 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0519%5 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.0225%5 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.0315%5 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.0227%5 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0932%5 Oct →
poseidon2–9-0.1225%2 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0133%2 Oct →
poseidon9–30.2446%2 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0418%2 Oct →
inferno5–130.0124%2 Oct →
poseidon4–9-0.1130%2 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0715%2 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0636%1 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.0725%1 Oct →
ancient13–40.0417%1 Oct →
nuke13–10.0732%1 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0435%1 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0712%1 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.