ezah — CS2 Stats

76561199046612841[U:1:1086347113]✓ No bans

1,467Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,893Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11623 of 27189 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGezahFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,893 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning49
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46522Last 10046%Win rateWWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression3.8
Utility6.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.9
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time548ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — overpass
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28131546%-0.00
ancientD1861233%0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
nukeC146843%-0.01
cacheA116555%-0.01
mirageS75271%0.02
anubis3030%-0.04
overpass110100%0.07
debris110100%0.11
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

403Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29543%1.0414.4
Ancient7247%0.9814.5
Inferno7050%0.9714.1
Mirage6052%0.9113.9
Nuke4271%1.2517.5
Cache3551%1.2015.8
Anubis30%0.9315.3
Overpass10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
554msReaction time
22.7%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
20.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.6502% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0522%29 Aug
ancient13–110.037%29 Aug
inferno11–13-0.039%29 Aug
nuke13–90.0728%29 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0322%29 Aug
dust213–80.0912%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0117%20 Aug
dust213–4-0.0422%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0315%20 Aug
ancient13–30.1024%19 Aug
mirage13–80.0216%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0619%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.019%18 Aug
dust25–13-0.073%18 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0012%17 Aug
cache13–4-0.0030%16 Aug
dust213–90.0215%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.076%15 Aug
inferno13–50.047%15 Aug
dust213–100.0727%15 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0012%14 Aug
ancient7–130.0324%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0117%13 Aug
mirage16–130.0023%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0112%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0220%13 Aug
dust20–13-0.096%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0023%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0211%11 Aug
cache13–9-0.048%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0011%11 Aug
ancient9–130.0017%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0113%11 Aug
anubis8–130.0127%10 Aug
ancient6–130.0012%10 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0217%9 Aug
overpass13–00.0742%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0317%9 Aug
dust29–13-0.0110%9 Aug
cache11–13-0.0024%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0022%8 Aug
dust213–50.0412%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0619%8 Aug
cache13–5-0.0513%8 Aug
ancient13–110.026%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0319%8 Aug
dust23–13-0.1021%8 Aug
ancient13–70.0921%8 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0519%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.0319%7 Aug
dust22–13-0.086%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0111%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0319%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.028%5 Aug
inferno7–130.0115%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.055%5 Aug
nuke13–110.0218%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0211%4 Aug
dust29–130.0320%4 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0725%4 Aug
inferno11–130.0125%4 Aug
ancient1–13-0.050%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0419%4 Aug
cache13–4-0.0320%4 Aug
ancient13–80.0414%3 Aug
dust213–100.0513%3 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0411%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0510%3 Aug
dust213–50.1514%3 Aug
nuke10–13-0.036%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.046%2 Aug
inferno13–40.0013%2 Aug
mirage13–100.1026%2 Aug
inferno13–50.0331%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0126%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0118%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0620%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.084%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0419%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.065%1 Aug
cache7–130.0313%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.0518%1 Aug
dust215–150.0618%1 Aug
dust213–10.0813%31 Jul
debris9–30.1117%31 Jul
vertigo5–9-0.068%31 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0611%31 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0614%31 Jul
ancient9–130.0116%31 Jul
cache13–90.0519%31 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0113%31 Jul
cache7–130.0222%31 Jul
dust211–130.0215%31 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0215%30 Jul
nuke7–130.0117%30 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0818%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0523%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0121%29 Jul
dust27–130.0025%29 Jul
nuke13–100.0224%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →