Embalming Myself

Embalming Myself — CS2 Stats

76561198308852371[U:1:348586643]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

785Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
963Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating2,653Grey band · top ~88.7% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+190Premier CS Rating · 2,463 → 2,653

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,653 +1,481 27 Aug – 8 Oct · 17 days played
1,1722,975peak 2,97527 Aug8 Oct
3,080Peak Premier in tracked matches
16Days played since 2026-08-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 322 below peak (2,975)
  • -134 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 2,347 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches47——
Win rate47%——
K/D0.99——
Headshot %47%——

Measured 7 Sep 2026 → 8 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Grey band among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,645), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerGrey band medianLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate43.6%38.2%39.9%above
Shot accuracy5.8%3.6%7.0%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.750.830.920.16 short
Match win rate39.9%40.2%42.3%2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Light Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEmbalming MyselfPREMIER2,653 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning67
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateWWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.5
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time645ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 30 Aug →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 7 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 3–11 · inferno, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2212–1055%0.01
infernoC167–944%-0.00
ancientA169–756%0.02
dust2C145–936%-0.01
cacheA138–562%0.03
anubisB115–645%0.00
nukeD82–625%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,363Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
1,383Matches
39.9%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Grey band
5.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Grey band
1,819MVPs
479Hours (in match)
1,400Bombs planted
271Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,695inferno
1,680nuke
1,568dust2
189train
115vertigo
37cbble
2office
1assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
646msReaction time
53.1%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
5.35HE damage / grenade
7.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4958 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0942%8 Oct →
inferno13–70.1219%8 Oct →
cache11–130.0326%8 Oct →
anubis7–130.0024%7 Oct →
dust27–130.0127%7 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0116%7 Oct →
anubis11–130.0129%7 Oct →
ancient13–20.1214%6 Oct →
ancient4–10.0719%6 Oct →
cache13–10.0323%6 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0211%6 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0324%6 Oct →
anubis13–110.0331%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0213%6 Oct →
nuke15–150.0518%6 Oct →
inferno6–130.0037%1 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.010%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.078%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.0421%30 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0625%30 Sept →
nuke11–130.1137%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.0521%29 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0418%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0041%29 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0125%29 Sept →
cache10–130.0518%9 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0028%9 Sept →
nuke13–70.0223%9 Sept →
inferno13–20.1050%9 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0121%9 Sept →
cache16–130.0330%9 Sept →
dust210–130.0131%9 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0316%8 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0135%8 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0133%8 Sept →
anubis13–60.0035%8 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0419%8 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0614%8 Sept →
ancient4–130.0428%8 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0421%8 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0328%8 Sept →
mirage9–130.0232%8 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0333%8 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0326%8 Sept →
ancient13–100.1027%8 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0139%7 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0226%7 Sept →
cache13–60.1052%7 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0436%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0314%7 Sept →
ancient13–110.0234%7 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0421%6 Sept →
anubis13–90.0026%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0319%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0311%6 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0415%6 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0622%1 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0321%1 Sept →
mirage14–160.0212%31 Aug →
ancient13–30.0541%31 Aug →
mirage11–130.1042%31 Aug →
inferno13–40.0316%31 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0811%31 Aug →
inferno8–130.0114%31 Aug →
mirage7–130.0919%30 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0411%30 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0136%30 Aug →
mirage13–40.1436%30 Aug →
dust213–60.1021%30 Aug →
dust215–150.0321%30 Aug →
dust213–2-0.030%30 Aug →
anubis4–130.0110%30 Aug →
dust210–130.0114%29 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0432%29 Aug →
inferno3–11-0.0522%29 Aug →
cache13–80.0028%29 Aug →
ancient13–50.0021%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0321%29 Aug →
anubis13–110.0614%29 Aug →
mirage13–30.1032%29 Aug →
cache8–130.0612%29 Aug →
inferno13–80.0313%29 Aug →
cache15–150.0920%28 Aug →
mirage16–140.0225%28 Aug →
dust213–100.0324%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0320%28 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0738%28 Aug →
cache11–2-0.010%28 Aug →
ancient12–160.0220%27 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.1118%27 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0021%27 Aug →
dust213–11-0.009%27 Aug →
mirage15–150.0122%27 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.085%27 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.0218%27 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0215%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.058%27 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.1211%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0122%27 Aug →
mirage9–130.0321%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.