Logs

Logs — CS2 Stats

NP76561198304710616[U:1:344444888]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

568Tracked matches65%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,075Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,232Blue band · top ~37.8% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 13 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,232 +486 13 Aug16 Sept · 21 days played
11,66513,829peak 13,82913 Aug16 Sept
13,829Peak Premier in tracked matches
948Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 948
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 597 below peak (13,829)
  • +416 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,768 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2624+2
Win rate58%42%+16pp
K/D5.460.99+4.47
Headshot %88%48%+40pp

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=18,772), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate54.2%41.9%44.3%above
Shot accuracy0.0%9.6%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.110.981.03above
Match win rate47.2%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLogsPREMIER13,232 · Blue bandPEAK ELO948csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning65
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48457Last 10048%Win rateWWLLWWTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 1163 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.5
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.5
Utility3.5
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time554ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 8–0 · nuke, 26 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · dust2, 23 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · office, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1911858%0.02
mirageD1651131%-0.04
dust2C146843%-0.02
ancientS1410471%0.00
anubisB126650%-0.01
officeC83538%-0.01
infernoC83538%-0.00
cache42250%-0.01
vertigo31233%-0.04
fachwerk1010%0.05
train110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,791Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 25% of Blue band
1,284Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Blue band
54.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Blue band
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,199MVPs
1,075Hours (in match)
744Bombs planted
277Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,476nuke
1,442dust2
988inferno
771vertigo
553train
142office
10italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
39%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
60.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage617%0.417.2
Dust2633%0.7112.7
Ancient425%0.7611.8
Inferno2100%1.0815.5
Anubis250%0.7614.5
Overpass250%1.0817.0
Nuke1100%0.9314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
545msReaction time
66.7%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
4.75HE damage / grenade
6.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3918 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.6066% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–140.0019%16 Sept
ancient13–20.0612%16 Sept
nuke9–130.0424%16 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0811%15 Sept
cache13–10-0.0226%14 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0514%14 Sept
dust212–12-0.0313%13 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0215%13 Sept
nuke13–90.0326%13 Sept
office10–13-0.090%13 Sept
fachwerk10–130.0520%12 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.0914%12 Sept
nuke13–50.0924%12 Sept
office13–10-0.1230%12 Sept
office13–9-0.0733%12 Sept
office12–120.108%12 Sept
office13–9-0.026%12 Sept
office12–120.1028%12 Sept
anubis13–1-0.0121%12 Sept
dust213–50.0211%12 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0113%11 Sept
dust29–13-0.0315%11 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0114%10 Sept
nuke11–130.0313%10 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0612%9 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0320%9 Sept
ancient13–70.0611%9 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0511%9 Sept
dust213–60.0415%9 Sept
anubis13–80.0017%8 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0416%8 Sept
nuke5–130.0820%7 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0816%3 Sept
inferno16–140.1013%3 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0414%3 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0217%1 Sept
dust215–15-0.0113%31 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0017%31 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0125%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.025%30 Aug
cache16–12-0.0124%30 Aug
mirage13–4-0.047%30 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0114%30 Aug
dust213–8-0.0323%30 Aug
office7–13-0.0024%30 Aug
office8–130.0313%30 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0411%29 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.033%29 Aug
vertigo7–130.0112%29 Aug
nuke13–100.0413%29 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0212%28 Aug
inferno13–20.1128%28 Aug
nuke3–13-0.046%27 Aug
dust213–8-0.0721%27 Aug
anubis13–50.0313%27 Aug
nuke13–70.1213%26 Aug
inferno13–60.0116%26 Aug
nuke13–80.0222%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0216%26 Aug
nuke8–00.1540%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0313%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0826%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0310%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0212%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0111%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.095%24 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0115%23 Aug
cache10–13-0.0114%23 Aug
dust21–40.1450%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0611%22 Aug
anubis13–11-0.016%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.039%21 Aug
train13–7-0.0411%21 Aug
ancient13–40.0318%21 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1115%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0111%20 Aug
mirage2–13-0.087%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0116%19 Aug
ancient13–40.076%18 Aug
dust24–13-0.0710%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0115%18 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0315%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.055%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0418%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.049%17 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0910%17 Aug
mirage13–8-0.019%17 Aug
ancient6–13-0.027%17 Aug
ancient13–30.005%17 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0814%16 Aug
mirage6–2-0.1511%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0622%16 Aug
ancient13–00.096%16 Aug
nuke13–30.0512%16 Aug
cache5–13-0.0218%16 Aug
anubis13–2-0.040%16 Aug
anubis13–30.0619%15 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0614%13 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0513%13 Aug
dust24–13-0.0117%13 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →