Dusan Nasilni

Dusan Nasilni — CS2 Stats

RS76561198302244183[U:1:341978455]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,482Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,727Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,470Purple band · top ~18.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+713Premier CS Rating · 16,757 → 17,470

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,470 -1,167 4 Sept – 15 Nov · 31 days played
15,98018,637peak 18,6374 Sept15 Nov
18,739Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,167 below peak (18,637)
  • +546 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,530 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,948), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.9%45.7%46.8%5.9% short
Shot accuracy13.4%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.051.06above
Match win rate48.8%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDusan NasilniFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,470 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning66
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWTWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 72% on T to 52% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.6
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time627ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 17 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · ancient, 21 Sept →
430msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 25 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2214–864%0.03
mirageB2110–1148%0.04
dust2B179–853%0.02
infernoC156–940%-0.01
anubisA127–558%0.04
nukeS86–275%0.00
cacheC52–340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

179,949Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
8,530Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
40.9%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
22,114MVPs
3,727Hours (in match)
6,939Bombs planted
2,586Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,442
AWP21,988
MP95,384
MAC-104,889
P903,659

Lifetime map wins

13,504dust2
9,682inferno
2,073nuke
859vertigo
685train
277cbble
165lake
71office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

440Matches
52%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
91.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10550%1.3218.4
Ancient4844%1.5317.2
Dust24562%1.2217.9
Anubis4356%1.0516.3
Inferno3336%1.1216.8
Nuke743%1.1217.4
Vertigo540%0.8917.6
Overpass10%0.7319.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
629msReaction time
71.7%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
10.18HE damage / grenade
10.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–16-0.0520%15 Nov →
inferno13–100.0321%15 Nov →
mirage15–150.0921%15 Nov →
ancient13–40.1013%14 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.025%14 Nov →
anubis13–50.1010%14 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0119%14 Nov →
ancient11–130.0319%13 Nov →
ancient13–80.0817%13 Nov →
mirage13–80.0414%12 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0510%12 Nov →
anubis11–130.1016%11 Nov →
inferno13–40.0310%11 Nov →
nuke13–80.0811%11 Nov →
nuke13–110.0118%11 Nov →
ancient13–90.0219%11 Nov →
ancient13–90.0411%9 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0811%1 Nov →
cache4–130.0017%1 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.048%31 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.044%31 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0311%31 Oct →
mirage13–80.0834%30 Oct →
mirage3–130.066%30 Oct →
dust28–130.0233%28 Oct →
mirage13–90.0231%27 Oct →
mirage5–130.0214%27 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0414%26 Oct →
mirage13–70.0518%26 Oct →
ancient13–110.1013%26 Oct →
dust29–130.0127%26 Oct →
dust213–70.0626%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0121%17 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0311%17 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0211%15 Oct →
ancient13–60.037%15 Oct →
anubis13–160.0210%12 Oct →
inferno13–100.0213%9 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0514%8 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0110%8 Oct →
anubis13–30.0317%8 Oct →
dust213–60.1111%7 Oct →
anubis19–170.0413%6 Oct →
ancient4–130.027%5 Oct →
mirage10–130.0414%4 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.055%2 Oct →
ancient10–130.0213%2 Oct →
cache13–100.0113%2 Oct →
dust213–100.048%2 Oct →
mirage13–40.0816%2 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.029%29 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0420%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.1014%27 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.088%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0718%25 Sept →
anubis13–20.1024%25 Sept →
inferno10–130.0115%25 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0217%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0421%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0113%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0119%23 Sept →
anubis13–70.0110%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0722%22 Sept →
ancient8–130.0221%22 Sept →
ancient13–60.0118%22 Sept →
dust210–130.0315%22 Sept →
inferno13–110.0221%22 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0212%22 Sept →
ancient13–20.1242%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.0427%21 Sept →
ancient13–40.0428%21 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0018%21 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0613%20 Sept →
ancient12–160.1019%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0114%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0014%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.089%20 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0219%20 Sept →
dust211–130.1116%20 Sept →
mirage12–160.0321%20 Sept →
mirage13–70.0822%20 Sept →
inferno15–150.0216%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.0517%19 Sept →
inferno13–160.0317%19 Sept →
cache13–90.0418%19 Sept →
mirage8–130.0423%19 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0219%19 Sept →
mirage4–9-0.0513%19 Sept →
dust213–80.0411%18 Sept →
ancient10–130.0321%18 Sept →
inferno13–90.0120%18 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0515%18 Sept →
ancient3–130.0834%18 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0511%17 Sept →
mirage13–50.2023%17 Sept →
dust213–40.0426%15 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.042%14 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0415%14 Sept →
nuke11–130.0312%14 Sept →
dust27–130.0521%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.