Jätkänpötkylä98

Jätkänpötkylä98 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198298220513[U:1:337954785]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

565Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,478Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,403Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81764 of 221266 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,618 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 7 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,403 -4,080 7 Apr3 Sept · 20 days played
19,31924,037peak 24,0377 Apr3 Sept
24,150Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,618Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-04-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,618
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 133 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,634 below peak (24,037)
  • -147 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,683 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 597 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.3%46.8%48.3%3.0% short
Shot accuracy17.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.061.070.07 short
Match win rate44.0%46.3%46.9%2.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJätkänpötkylä98FACEITLevel 8 · 1,618 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,403 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,618csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning70
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY424810Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.1
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch6.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning7.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time546ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 22 Jun
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · inferno, 19 Apr
391msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · inferno, 22 Jun
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 19 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17overpassWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29111838%0.03
infernoA23131057%0.04
nukeA1710759%0.02
ancientD93633%0.00
cacheD93633%0.03
overpassD61517%0.04
anubis2020%0.07
eldorado1010%-0.10
debris110100%0.06
dust21010%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.10
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,276Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,386Matches
44.0%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot %
17.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15,124MVPs
2,019Hours (in match)
4,708Bombs planted
2,214Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,691
AWP19,798
AUG2,048
SG 5531,993
SSG 081,946

Lifetime map wins

7,990inferno
3,397nuke
2,955train
2,258dust2
1,965vertigo
504lake
420cbble
189office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

199Matches
56%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
75.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4659%1.0915.4
Nuke3067%1.2615.5
Inferno1173%1.2819.4
Anubis967%0.9215.2
Ancient933%0.8613.2
Vertigo862%1.1013.4
Train560%1.3016.8
Dust2450%1.1515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
563msReaction time
54.3%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
5.74HE damage / grenade
4.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3966 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–160.0621%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0730%3 Sept
overpass7–9-0.0619%1 Sept
inferno9–50.0829%1 Sept
anubis8–130.0321%26 Aug
inferno9–70.0129%25 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2425%18 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0325%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0318%11 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0321%11 Aug
mirage9–130.0433%11 Aug
mirage16–130.0619%10 Aug
cache2–13-0.0621%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0528%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0714%6 Aug
ancient11–130.0214%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0319%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.038%23 Jul
inferno9–50.1229%23 Jul
eldorado6–9-0.1015%23 Jul
nuke4–9-0.1413%23 Jul
inferno9–50.0429%23 Jul
cache10–13-0.0228%16 Jul
nuke13–80.0615%16 Jul
mirage13–20.0520%16 Jul
mirage7–130.0219%15 Jul
cache13–11-0.0217%15 Jul
mirage5–130.0515%15 Jul
inferno9–20.2328%15 Jul
ancient4–130.0021%13 Jul
mirage2–130.0035%13 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0320%13 Jul
cache2–13-0.0314%13 Jul
mirage13–50.1517%13 Jul
debris9–50.0619%12 Jul
mirage15–150.0113%9 Jul
ancient13–90.0419%9 Jul
dust26–130.0219%9 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0222%9 Jul
cache7–130.0628%7 Jul
cache13–30.2214%7 Jul
mirage13–100.0420%25 Jun
ancient13–100.0123%25 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0021%23 Jun
inferno9–40.2935%22 Jun
nuke13–60.0329%22 Jun
mirage13–60.1221%22 Jun
nuke14–160.0024%16 Jun
mirage8–130.0317%16 Jun
mirage13–100.1820%16 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0217%16 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0114%8 Jun
nuke13–110.0422%6 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0718%6 Jun
overpass8–80.0817%6 Jun
overpass4–130.0524%1 Jun
nuke11–130.0331%1 Jun
inferno16–120.0512%29 May
mirage10–130.0520%29 May
cache13–40.0422%29 May
mirage13–16-0.0013%27 May
ancient15–150.0422%24 May
anubis11–130.1227%24 May
cache9–130.0421%24 May
nuke13–70.0730%23 May
mirage12–120.0415%23 May
inferno4–13-0.0314%23 May
mirage8–13-0.0216%21 May
mirage13–110.0314%21 May
nuke13–80.0122%21 May
inferno6–9-0.1024%21 May
mirage10–130.0112%20 May
nuke9–7-0.0329%9 May
ancient8–130.0114%2 May
mirage9–130.0119%2 May
inferno8–80.0722%29 Apr
inferno9–70.1122%29 Apr
cache12–12-0.0026%29 Apr
overpass9–10.2110%27 Apr
nuke9–70.0116%27 Apr
inferno9–50.0724%27 Apr
nuke5–90.0123%23 Apr
inferno5–90.0426%23 Apr
overpass9–130.0219%21 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0222%21 Apr
nuke15–150.0225%21 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0112%19 Apr
inferno13–10.0345%19 Apr
nuke16–130.0324%19 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0116%19 Apr
poseidon8–8-0.1015%16 Apr
overpass4–9-0.0710%16 Apr
nuke8–8-0.0317%16 Apr
inferno8–80.059%16 Apr
train10–130.0121%15 Apr
nuke13–100.1611%15 Apr
inferno13–30.088%15 Apr
inferno13–60.0511%8 Apr
nuke13–50.1511%8 Apr
mirage11–130.0419%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →