sahns

sahns — CS2 Stats

NO76561198293945121[U:1:333679393]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

615Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,720Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating24,994Top 25% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23296 of 258177 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,994 +4,273 25 Aug – 26 Oct · 23 days played
19,64825,346peak 25,34625 Aug26 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,705 +0 30 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,7051,705peak 1,70530 Aug1 Sept
26,047Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,705Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 352 below peak (25,346)
  • +5,346 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 6 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate45.3%50.9%
Shot accuracy15.6%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.031.09
Match win rate44.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsahnsFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,994 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,705csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning51
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63–35–2Last 10063%Win rateLWWTLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility2.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.1
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time497ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 18 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 3 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 15 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 17infernoWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3021–970%0.03
nukeS1714–382%0.03
anubisC167–944%0.02
dust2B158–753%0.03
cacheS75–271%0.04
infernoC73–443%0.05
ancientB63–350%-0.02
fachwerk—11–0100%0.10
overpass—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,909Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
3,564Matches
44.7%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot %
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
8,419MVPs
1,720Hours (in match)
3,243Bombs planted
1,082Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,627
AWP10,023
Knife1,439
SSG 081,182

Lifetime map wins

5,290dust2
3,076inferno
2,491nuke
1,298train
786vertigo
660cbble
272office
120safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

460Matches
56%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
86.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6569%1.3417.1
Dust22673%1.4719.5
Ancient2564%1.2616.9
Nuke2454%1.4918.1
Anubis1354%1.5217.1
Inferno1145%1.2018.6
Cache944%1.3519.2
Overpass633%1.2218.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
485msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
3.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3445 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.7319% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0125%26 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0125%26 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0116%26 Oct →
mirage15–150.0226%26 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0125%22 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0022%22 Oct →
dust25–130.0737%22 Oct →
cache13–80.0224%22 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0218%22 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0128%22 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0729%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0112%22 Oct →
fachwerk13–110.1028%21 Oct →
overpass9–00.1516%21 Oct →
nuke9–50.1427%21 Oct →
nuke6–90.1422%20 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0119%20 Oct →
dust213–110.0826%20 Oct →
cache13–40.1122%20 Oct →
anubis13–80.0317%20 Oct →
nuke13–80.0415%20 Oct →
inferno13–40.1020%20 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0120%19 Oct →
inferno13–60.2125%18 Oct →
cache13–100.0417%18 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0521%18 Oct →
anubis15–150.0520%16 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0825%15 Oct →
anubis13–50.0723%15 Oct →
nuke13–50.0324%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0219%15 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0321%15 Oct →
mirage13–90.0718%14 Oct →
anubis13–50.0410%14 Oct →
mirage13–20.0430%13 Oct →
mirage13–160.0016%12 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0610%11 Oct →
mirage13–50.0415%11 Oct →
cache7–10.0931%11 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0316%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.1518%10 Oct →
cache11–130.0033%10 Oct →
anubis11–130.039%10 Oct →
mirage13–80.0323%10 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0424%9 Oct →
nuke13–40.0027%8 Oct →
nuke13–70.079%8 Oct →
mirage16–120.0422%8 Oct →
nuke16–140.0317%8 Oct →
inferno13–00.0414%7 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.049%5 Oct →
inferno6–130.0211%3 Oct →
nuke3–00.1943%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0514%1 Oct →
mirage3–130.0127%1 Oct →
dust216–140.0836%25 Sept →
mirage14–160.0225%25 Sept →
mirage13–60.0822%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.0415%24 Sept →
dust26–130.0327%22 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0420%22 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0129%22 Sept →
mirage13–20.0419%21 Sept →
dust213–50.0429%21 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0626%15 Sept →
anubis13–60.0729%15 Sept →
dust217–190.0322%11 Sept →
ancient13–80.1217%10 Sept →
anubis13–20.0831%10 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0329%10 Sept →
nuke13–110.0312%9 Sept →
mirage13–30.1210%9 Sept →
dust27–130.0121%9 Sept →
nuke13–90.0228%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0121%8 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0221%7 Sept →
dust213–40.1229%7 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0420%7 Sept →
mirage13–10.0222%7 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0232%7 Sept →
mirage10–130.0217%5 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0511%5 Sept →
cache13–110.0123%5 Sept →
anubis13–70.0728%4 Sept →
nuke13–80.0324%30 Aug →
nuke13–110.0532%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.1427%30 Aug →
mirage6–130.0422%29 Aug →
mirage13–160.0727%29 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0112%28 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0113%28 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0118%28 Aug →
inferno10–130.0429%28 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0226%27 Aug →
mirage13–90.0517%26 Aug →
dust213–80.0816%25 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0025%25 Aug →
anubis5–130.0321%22 Aug →
anubis8–130.0221%18 Aug →
mirage13–70.0017%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.