PUH.

PUH. — CS2 Stats

KI76561198336354439[U:1:376088711]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,167Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,910Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,153Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79856 of 258177 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,153 -3,615 7 Jun – 24 Oct · 21 days played
20,00024,106peak 24,1067 Jun24 Oct
24,152Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,457Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-06-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,953 below peak (24,106)
  • -3,902 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,847 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.7%46.8%48.2%6.5% short
Shot accuracy14.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.161.061.07above
Match win rate49.4%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPUH.FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,153 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,457csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning77
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · +46ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning7.7
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels8.8
Win Impact2.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time522ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 499ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 18 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 13 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%0.01
dust2D165–1131%-0.02
nukeS1511–473%0.01
cacheC146–843%0.02
anubisD103–730%0.03
ancientS75–271%0.02
infernoD61–517%-0.01
overpass—32–167%0.01
debris—22–0100%0.13
vertigo—20–20%-0.16
eldorado—10–10%-0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,266Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
2,365Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
41.7%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,269MVPs
999Hours (in match)
2,688Bombs planted
571Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,350
AWP7,107
FAMAS1,267
Knife764

Lifetime map wins

2,927nuke
2,796inferno
2,521dust2
721train
717office
671vertigo
369cbble
275lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

94Matches
63%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
92.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2857%1.0617.2
Nuke1861%1.3720.0
Overpass967%1.3019.9
Cache862%1.2719.4
Dust2771%1.3020.9
Anubis5100%1.5721.2
Vertigo425%2.2216.0
Ancient450%1.1818.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
516msReaction time
67.4%T opening success
63.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
10.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0020%24 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0119%24 Oct →
mirage13–40.0313%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.038%23 Oct →
dust213–40.0220%23 Oct →
anubis9–130.058%23 Oct →
ancient13–50.0817%23 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0214%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0517%22 Oct →
anubis6–130.0019%22 Oct →
dust25–130.0228%22 Oct →
anubis6–130.0617%22 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0729%18 Oct →
anubis13–100.0817%18 Oct →
debris9–10.0824%18 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.1919%18 Oct →
dust29–130.0320%18 Oct →
cache9–130.0514%18 Oct →
nuke9–40.2218%18 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0118%18 Oct →
inferno13–60.0217%18 Oct →
cache13–100.0614%18 Oct →
nuke13–40.1018%18 Oct →
mirage9–130.0718%18 Oct →
mirage13–110.0423%18 Oct →
dust213–100.0219%18 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0217%17 Oct →
anubis13–70.0615%17 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0117%17 Oct →
cache11–130.0315%17 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0716%17 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0230%17 Oct →
anubis15–150.047%16 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0211%16 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.118%16 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0215%16 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0712%16 Oct →
nuke13–50.0216%15 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0517%11 Oct →
mirage10–130.0214%11 Oct →
cache0–3-0.060%11 Oct →
mirage13–50.0618%11 Oct →
cache7–10.0723%11 Oct →
inferno6–130.0713%11 Oct →
dust26–13-0.009%11 Oct →
mirage15–150.0114%11 Oct →
ancient13–90.0718%9 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0517%9 Oct →
mirage14–160.0811%9 Oct →
cache13–160.0813%9 Oct →
dust213–80.0210%9 Oct →
cache13–40.0812%9 Oct →
cache10–13-0.017%8 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0317%8 Oct →
mirage13–20.0314%8 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0610%5 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0221%5 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.1113%27 Sept →
mirage13–30.093%24 Sept →
cache13–110.0317%20 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0140%13 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0720%11 Sept →
mirage8–10.1032%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0110%5 Sept →
anubis2–130.0313%5 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0111%5 Sept →
anubis13–80.0227%5 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0720%30 Aug →
nuke13–110.0616%30 Aug →
cache13–30.0015%30 Aug →
nuke3–2-0.050%30 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0713%30 Aug →
nuke13–110.0116%30 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0316%29 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0412%29 Aug →
nuke9–130.0012%28 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0511%28 Aug →
ancient16–140.0413%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.1115%28 Aug →
debris9–70.199%28 Aug →
eldorado6–9-0.0512%25 Jul →
anubis8–130.018%20 Jun →
overpass9–60.1018%19 Jun →
cache6–130.0334%19 Jun →
vertigo2–9-0.190%19 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0315%17 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.038%17 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0111%17 Jun →
vertigo6–9-0.1329%17 Jun →
nuke9–00.000%17 Jun →
inferno10–130.018%13 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0817%13 Jun →
poseidon6–9-0.0812%13 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0414%11 Jun →
overpass3–9-0.0314%11 Jun →
ancient13–40.0815%7 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0413%7 Jun →
nuke10–130.039%7 Jun →
dust213–90.0315%7 Jun →
nuke16–140.0013%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.