a.250

a.250 — CS2 Stats

CR76561198293223886[U:1:332958158]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

960Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
558Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,837Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72867 of 261661 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 960 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,837 +2,837 10 May – 23 Oct · 24 days played
18,00022,704peak 22,70410 May23 Oct
22,704Peak Premier in tracked matches
712Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2024-11-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,867 below peak (22,704)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,798 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,163 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,219), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate51.2%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%12.2%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.060.950.98above
Match win rate47.5%42.6%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGa.250FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER20,837 · Pink bandPEAK ELO712csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning41
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–39–7Last 10054%Win rateLWTWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +11.6pp headshot accuracy · −101ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 40%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.1
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.06
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time613ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 31.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 23 May →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 27 Jun →
344msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 11 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 12 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 32dust2Weakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3418–1653%0.03
mirageA3219–1359%0.03
dust2C198–1142%0.02
ancient—32–167%0.02
anubis—32–167%0.01
cache—30–30%-0.00
overpass—32–167%0.08
nuke—22–0100%-0.02
office—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,538Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
1,530Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 2 players
51.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,079MVPs
558Hours (in match)
1,275Bombs planted
314Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,751inferno
2,014dust2
1,213nuke
766vertigo
239train
26office
2ar_baggage
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

113Matches
45%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
81.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5848%1.0315.8
Dust21942%1.1617.6
Inferno1331%0.7611.5
Vertigo1250%1.0314.1
Nuke450%0.9213.3
Anubis333%0.7212.3
Ancient367%0.8215.7
Train10%1.7630.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
627msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
18.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–90.0929%6 Sept →
inferno9–00.1050%6 Sept →
inferno8–80.0721%6 Sept →
inferno9–40.1089%6 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.2012%6 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0116%4 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0215%4 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0225%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0225%31 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0124%31 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.034%31 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0721%15 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0118%15 Aug →
inferno9–30.0726%14 Aug →
inferno13–80.0622%14 Aug →
dust213–40.0117%14 Aug →
mirage6–130.0625%14 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0317%13 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1015%13 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0125%10 Aug →
inferno7–90.0218%9 Aug →
inferno7–90.0632%9 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0125%9 Aug →
inferno9–50.2028%8 Aug →
anubis13–20.0641%8 Aug →
mirage13–20.1034%8 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0353%8 Aug →
mirage16–120.0224%2 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0232%2 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0725%30 Jul →
mirage5–130.0131%30 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0323%29 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0023%29 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.0215%21 Jul →
inferno9–30.1535%21 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.129%21 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0218%19 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0323%19 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0515%19 Jul →
inferno8–80.0629%12 Jul →
inferno9–60.0433%12 Jul →
dust24–13-0.110%12 Jul →
anubis13–00.000%12 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0620%5 Jul →
mirage13–80.0418%5 Jul →
inferno1–9-0.1138%5 Jul →
inferno9–40.1821%5 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.0540%5 Jul →
mirage15–150.0322%2 Jul →
inferno9–40.0726%2 Jul →
inferno9–00.12100%27 Jun →
inferno9–70.0443%27 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1416%27 Jun →
dust213–100.0223%27 Jun →
inferno13–100.0319%27 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0518%26 Jun →
dust213–40.0523%18 Jun →
mirage13–1-0.040%18 Jun →
mirage6–7-0.0244%18 Jun →
inferno9–10.0833%17 Jun →
mirage8–130.0335%16 Jun →
overpass9–00.0150%16 Jun →
mirage13–1-0.0023%13 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0115%11 Jun →
mirage13–90.0424%11 Jun →
overpass6–90.0916%11 Jun →
inferno9–1-0.040%11 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0629%9 Jun →
inferno8–2-0.0323%9 Jun →
overpass13–50.1334%9 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0032%9 Jun →
ancient7–130.0821%9 Jun →
dust212–120.0431%8 Jun →
dust211–20.0336%8 Jun →
mirage7–130.1335%8 Jun →
dust23–130.0934%6 Jun →
mirage13–110.1431%6 Jun →
dust29–130.1017%5 Jun →
inferno8–80.0946%5 Jun →
inferno8–130.0323%4 Jun →
dust213–50.0720%4 Jun →
dust213–30.1650%4 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0132%30 May →
cache12–120.0927%30 May →
mirage13–100.0524%30 May →
dust25–130.0135%24 May →
inferno9–30.1228%24 May →
mirage13–90.1638%24 May →
mirage13–10.1623%23 May →
inferno9–00.2864%23 May →
office13–80.0032%19 May →
mirage13–9-0.0548%19 May →
mirage4–130.0336%17 May →
dust213–00.0363%17 May →
mirage7–130.0224%17 May →
mirage9–130.1132%14 May →
mirage7–10.2113%14 May →
mirage11–130.0220%10 May →
nuke13–11-0.0327%10 May →
dust29–130.0320%10 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.