TimiBambini

TimiBambini — CS2 Stats

AX76561198292295063[U:1:332029335]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,221Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,919Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,609Purple band · top ~18% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,139 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 13 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,609 -809 13 Aug18 Sept · 29 days played
15,23118,751peak 18,75113 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,139 +0 1 Sept18 Sept · 5 observations
1,1391,139peak 1,1391 Sept18 Sept
19,026Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,139Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,139
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,142 below peak (18,751)
  • -1,021 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,391 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches367+29
Win rate47%14%+33pp
K/D1.020.76+0.26
Headshot %37%49%−12pp

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,393), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate36.0%44.8%45.7%9.7% short
Shot accuracy7.0%12.4%12.7%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.041.050.23 short
Match win rate40.1%45.2%45.7%5.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTimiBambiniFACEITLevel 6 · 1,139 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,609 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,139csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning56
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47494Last 10047%Win rateWWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.6
Utility6.8
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy13.9%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 7–1 · inferno, 25 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 20 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 18 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 24dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26121446%0.01
infernoA2415963%0.02
nukeC167944%0.02
dust2D123925%-0.02
cacheA106460%0.02
ancientC104640%0.00
anubis2020%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,609Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,512Matches
40.1%Match win rate
36.0%Headshot %
7.0%Shot accuracy
4,161MVPs
952Hours (in match)
2,628Bombs planted
452Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,216inferno
2,925dust2
2,159nuke
890train
863vertigo
588office
151cbble
75lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

148Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
83.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3549%1.0716.7
Dust22642%1.0414.6
Ancient1958%1.1116.4
Inferno1861%1.0015.1
Anubis1759%0.9715.4
Cache1155%1.1318.1
Nuke1040%0.9515.7
Overpass10%0.8916.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
594msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
11.28HE damage / grenade
10.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2156% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6514% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0011%15 Sept
mirage13–50.1114%15 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0520%15 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0313%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.027%13 Sept
nuke13–90.0613%13 Sept
cache8–130.0511%12 Sept
mirage13–110.0412%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0415%12 Sept
mirage13–20.0412%12 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0826%11 Sept
inferno13–30.0113%10 Sept
inferno2–13-0.006%7 Sept
nuke11–130.0321%7 Sept
dust216–13-0.0318%4 Sept
nuke9–130.0619%3 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0110%3 Sept
cache16–14-0.0025%3 Sept
ancient13–50.0910%3 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0312%3 Sept
mirage11–130.027%3 Sept
nuke10–130.0116%3 Sept
dust213–8-0.0225%3 Sept
cache13–30.0610%2 Sept
mirage9–130.019%2 Sept
mirage6–130.0422%1 Sept
mirage2–13-0.070%1 Sept
ancient13–40.0214%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0217%1 Sept
mirage4–13-0.058%31 Aug
ancient11–130.0312%30 Aug
nuke13–110.0723%28 Aug
inferno13–110.019%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0110%28 Aug
dust213–70.028%28 Aug
inferno16–130.0512%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0411%27 Aug
dust215–15-0.0411%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0626%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0213%25 Aug
inferno7–10.1932%25 Aug
inferno6–130.0824%23 Aug
mirage10–130.1020%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.049%23 Aug
inferno13–70.0513%23 Aug
cache13–10.1116%22 Aug
inferno7–13-0.049%21 Aug
anubis7–130.0312%21 Aug
cache13–7-0.036%21 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0311%21 Aug
mirage13–70.1013%21 Aug
inferno6–130.0113%21 Aug
cache9–13-0.0515%20 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0315%20 Aug
inferno11–130.0317%20 Aug
mirage10–130.0610%20 Aug
nuke15–150.078%20 Aug
inferno9–20.0867%20 Aug
mirage16–140.0415%18 Aug
inferno7–13-0.046%18 Aug
cache13–80.0113%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0221%18 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0011%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0415%18 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0113%18 Aug
dust215–15-0.0111%18 Aug
ancient13–80.019%18 Aug
nuke13–50.0417%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0422%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0921%17 Aug
inferno13–30.0721%17 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0117%16 Aug
ancient3–13-0.116%16 Aug
inferno13–20.047%16 Aug
mirage13–30.0635%16 Aug
dust211–130.0122%16 Aug
mirage6–2-0.037%16 Aug
ancient5–130.0125%16 Aug
cache10–130.0216%15 Aug
mirage9–130.0317%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.026%15 Aug
cache6–13-0.0420%15 Aug
anubis7–130.0221%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0516%14 Aug
nuke13–10.1010%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0025%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0110%14 Aug
inferno7–130.0218%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.0317%14 Aug
nuke10–13-0.079%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.048%14 Aug
cache13–100.046%14 Aug
inferno13–50.0213%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.046%13 Aug
dust25–13-0.0413%13 Aug
inferno16–130.048%13 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0514%13 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0523%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.047%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0435%13 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →