[NGB] Mac

[NGB] Mac — CS2 Stats

76561198291453803[U:1:331188075]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,048Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,008Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,266Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12018 of 261582 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+988Premier CS Rating · 25,278 → 26,266

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,266 +3,579 31 Aug – 14 Nov · 29 days played
21,21027,466peak 27,46631 Aug14 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,929 +0 31 Aug – 20 Oct · 7 observations
1,9291,929peak 1,92931 Aug20 Oct
27,466Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,929Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,929
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,200 below peak (27,466)
  • +2,711 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,734 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches106145−39
Win rate50%52%−2pp
K/D1.101.35−0.25
Headshot %40%43%−3pp

Measured 20 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 16 Sep 2026 → 20 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate45.5%49.3%50.9%5.4% short
Shot accuracy11.3%13.4%11.8%0.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.121.180.10 short
Match win rate49.0%48.5%51.9%2.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Gold band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[NGB] MacPREMIER26,266 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,929csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning49
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.9
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · anubis, 24 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · inferno, 27 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 28 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D206–1430%0.00
mirageA1911–858%0.01
infernoB158–753%0.02
ancientD124–833%0.03
anubisS107–370%-0.01
cacheA106–460%0.03
nukeD92–722%0.00
overpass—20–20%0.02
office—22–0100%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,153Lifetime kills
1.08K/D
7,423Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Red band
45.5%Headshot %
11.3%Shot accuracy
20,677MVPs
3,096Hours (in match)
9,098Bombs planted
3,180Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,739
AWP23,676
FAMAS3,007
MP92,914
SSG 081,523

Lifetime map wins

18,320dust2
12,538inferno
7,123nuke
6,915vertigo
3,074train
569office
105cbble
34lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

555Matches
54%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4955%1.3719.2
Inferno3858%1.3317.2
Ancient3447%1.1116.1
Dust23158%1.2518.4
Anubis2348%1.1317.5
Nuke2259%1.4517.7
Train1136%1.1217.6
Overpass838%1.3515.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
558msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.95HE damage / grenade
16.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2001% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0312%14 Nov →
anubis13–110.0511%14 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.109%14 Nov →
inferno11–130.0114%14 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0517%14 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0518%13 Nov →
inferno13–30.0621%13 Nov →
nuke3–130.0019%13 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0317%13 Nov →
dust213–60.0627%13 Nov →
dust210–130.0812%12 Nov →
cache13–80.0429%12 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0414%11 Nov →
dust210–130.0431%11 Nov →
ancient13–90.1120%10 Nov →
mirage5–9-0.0311%10 Nov →
ancient13–16-0.0414%10 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0411%10 Nov →
dust213–80.0321%9 Nov →
dust211–13-0.037%9 Nov →
inferno8–130.0529%9 Nov →
inferno13–70.0140%6 Nov →
cache13–7-0.038%6 Nov →
overpass12–120.0616%6 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0417%5 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.009%5 Nov →
inferno8–130.0728%4 Nov →
cache14–160.0817%4 Nov →
cache5–130.0414%4 Nov →
ancient11–130.0217%4 Nov →
anubis12–16-0.0323%4 Nov →
dust24–130.0415%4 Nov →
mirage13–110.0227%3 Nov →
inferno9–130.0512%3 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0826%3 Nov →
overpass6–9-0.0221%3 Nov →
nuke6–130.0212%3 Nov →
ancient8–130.0716%2 Nov →
cache13–70.1016%2 Nov →
cache16–14-0.0112%2 Nov →
inferno13–110.0416%2 Nov →
mirage16–130.0126%2 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0622%2 Nov →
anubis15–15-0.059%2 Nov →
dust213–100.0730%2 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0613%1 Nov →
nuke4–130.0333%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0419%1 Nov →
cache8–13-0.0419%31 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0122%31 Oct →
mirage13–50.1230%30 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0013%30 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0211%30 Oct →
dust213–90.0619%30 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0730%30 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0114%30 Oct →
nuke9–130.0025%30 Oct →
inferno9–4-0.0329%30 Oct →
dust213–1-0.027%29 Oct →
office13–90.0518%29 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0014%29 Oct →
ancient7–130.088%28 Oct →
office13–10-0.0318%28 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0214%28 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0120%28 Oct →
inferno13–70.0526%28 Oct →
inferno13–10.0222%28 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0016%28 Oct →
anubis13–110.019%28 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0614%27 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0217%27 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0211%27 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0312%27 Oct →
cache16–130.089%27 Oct →
inferno0–8-0.0244%27 Oct →
mirage13–50.0124%27 Oct →
dust210–130.0123%27 Oct →
ancient16–140.0516%27 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0027%26 Oct →
mirage1–130.0441%26 Oct →
mirage13–60.0012%26 Oct →
cache13–90.0211%26 Oct →
inferno4–130.0317%26 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0616%26 Oct →
nuke13–40.1013%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0612%25 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0119%25 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0116%25 Oct →
anubis13–100.1324%24 Oct →
cache7–130.0114%23 Oct →
dust26–130.0423%23 Oct →
mirage16–130.1316%23 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0016%22 Oct →
mirage13–80.0919%22 Oct →
anubis13–1-0.034%22 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0229%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.0527%22 Oct →
mirage16–130.0527%22 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0530%22 Oct →
vertigo13–60.1121%21 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.