Paul E. Tician

Paul E. Tician — CS2 Stats

DE76561198288617436[U:1:328351708]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

319Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,553Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,181 +72 14 Oct – 9 Jun · 21 days played
12,05915,114peak 15,11414 Oct9 Jun
15,114Peak Premier in tracked matches
74Days played since 2025-10-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning42
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–55–3Last 10042%Win rateLTLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility3.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.1

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time463ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 454ms → last ⅓ avg 463ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–9 · office, 2 Jan →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · inferno, 31 May →
305msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 20 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 31 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA4223–1955%0.00
anubisD132–1115%-0.03
nukeD124–833%-0.02
overpassC94–544%-0.02
cacheD71–614%-0.03
mirageA53–260%0.00
officeA53–260%0.04
dust2—42–250%-0.01
ancient—20–20%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

40,693Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
2,593Matches
42.8%Match win rate
33.8%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,370MVPs
905Hours (in match)
2,546Bombs planted
509Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP5,631
AK-475,082
SSG 083,659
SG 5531,403
P901,176
MAG-71,048

Lifetime map wins

9,171inferno
1,081dust2
605nuke
388vertigo
334lake
306safehouse
275office
246ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
444msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
10.92HE damage / grenade
4.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4031 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5828% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.050%3 Nov →
inferno12–12-0.0110%2 Nov →
nuke1–9-0.1614%1 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0213%27 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0414%27 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0715%22 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.018%22 Oct →
nuke16–140.037%21 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0419%20 Oct →
inferno10–130.0113%14 Oct →
cache9–13-0.027%6 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.005%6 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0020%5 Oct →
inferno13–50.0338%5 Oct →
inferno13–100.0010%29 Sept →
cache7–13-0.069%24 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0521%21 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0023%16 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0415%16 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0611%14 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0320%14 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0530%25 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0419%25 Aug →
cache3–13-0.1023%17 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0117%11 Aug →
inferno13–110.0631%7 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0620%9 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.028%2 Jun →
inferno13–10.0850%31 May →
inferno13–90.0217%15 May →
nuke7–13-0.0415%15 May →
mirage9–130.0411%8 May →
anubis4–13-0.045%4 May →
cache13–40.066%30 Apr →
anubis11–130.0215%23 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.006%21 Apr →
anubis13–16-0.025%21 Apr →
overpass16–120.0513%20 Apr →
nuke13–90.0542%20 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0010%18 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0112%17 Apr →
office11–130.0114%3 Apr →
dust212–16-0.0317%2 Apr →
inferno13–80.1121%1 Apr →
nuke1–13-0.0430%31 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.059%29 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.003%28 Mar →
inferno13–3-0.0521%28 Mar →
overpass13–30.0113%28 Mar →
inferno16–140.0029%27 Mar →
nuke13–100.0215%27 Mar →
anubis5–130.018%26 Mar →
overpass13–80.014%26 Mar →
nuke13–100.039%25 Mar →
anubis16–13-0.018%25 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.046%25 Mar →
inferno10–130.008%24 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0013%23 Mar →
inferno13–10.079%23 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0413%23 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0731%22 Mar →
inferno13–2-0.050%22 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0422%19 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0115%18 Mar →
anubis2–13-0.057%17 Mar →
inferno12–120.036%16 Mar →
inferno13–5-0.015%16 Mar →
mirage13–100.068%15 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0514%10 Mar →
inferno11–130.0115%1 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0514%1 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0320%26 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0415%10 Feb →
dust24–13-0.047%6 Feb →
overpass13–5-0.0312%4 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0014%4 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0414%3 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0115%2 Feb →
inferno13–40.1130%1 Feb →
inferno16–13-0.0025%27 Jan →
inferno13–11-0.006%13 Jan →
inferno3–13-0.0512%10 Jan →
office13–90.146%2 Jan →
office13–8-0.0113%1 Jan →
office13–100.0418%23 Dec →
inferno12–160.0140%18 Dec →
ancient4–13-0.0322%18 Dec →
inferno13–100.010%2 Dec →
dust213–60.0521%22 Nov →
inferno13–90.0112%6 Nov →
inferno5–90.0231%1 Nov →
office9–130.047%31 Oct →
inferno8–130.0325%22 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0119%17 Oct →
train8–13-0.047%17 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.018%16 Oct →
inferno2–130.0014%16 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0429%14 Oct →
overpass2–13-0.074%14 Oct →
overpass9–13-0.0710%12 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.