clive

clive — CS2 Stats

DE76561198284955957[U:1:324690229]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

464Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,714Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#34284 of 225341 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,292 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 13 Mar 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,452 +7,298 6 Apr12 Oct · 20 days played
15,79023,452peak 23,4526 Apr12 Oct
23,452Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,292Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2025-03-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,292
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 208 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=26,479), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate41.6%51.0%
Shot accuracy18.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.031.09
Match win rate44.4%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcliveFACEITLevel 10 · 2,292 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,292csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning58
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY66331Last 10066%Win rateLWLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility2.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.8
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time611ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 28.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · train, 1 Jun
61%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 4 Jun
414msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · nuke, 8 Jun
13–1Biggest win · train, 5 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
136In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 88% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011955%0.00
infernoS1711665%0.00
ancientS1611569%0.01
nukeA159660%0.00
dust2S1412286%0.02
trainS87188%0.05
anubisD51420%-0.01
overpass220100%-0.01
brewery110100%0.16
vertigo110100%0.00
grail1010%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

132,459Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
5,134Matches
44.4%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
18.8%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 10 players
17,402MVPs
2,714Hours (in match)
5,406Bombs planted
2,194Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,178
AWP20,800
P2502,115
SG 5531,864
Knife1,848
UMP-451,669

Lifetime map wins

7,434dust2
6,114inferno
4,194train
2,787cbble
2,013nuke
793vertigo
66lake
45safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

657Matches
54%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.5ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9157%1.0315.7
Nuke5252%0.9715.3
Train4667%1.1317.0
Mirage3053%1.1819.9
Dust21669%1.1818.9
Overpass1050%0.6511.6
Inferno850%1.1118.0
Anubis450%1.3318.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.9%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
606msReaction time
45.7%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.53HE damage / grenade
12.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0321%11 Jun
inferno13–110.0539%11 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0222%10 Jun
dust213–110.0342%30 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0230%5 Nov
nuke8–13-0.0433%31 Oct
ancient13–90.0442%31 Oct
train12–16-0.0230%30 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0125%12 Oct
dust216–13-0.0131%12 Oct
dust213–70.0136%4 Oct
ancient13–50.0831%28 Sept
dust213–10-0.0119%27 Sept
overpass7–10.0112%26 Sept
dust27–13-0.0231%26 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0121%26 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0218%25 Sept
mirage13–80.0827%20 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0322%20 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0350%11 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0227%7 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0723%4 Sept
train13–6-0.0128%23 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0617%23 Aug
nuke13–40.0422%18 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0228%18 Jul
train16–13-0.0021%13 Jul
mirage9–130.0017%13 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0240%12 Jul
train13–40.0318%12 Jul
ancient9–130.0321%10 Jul
ancient13–100.0418%26 Jun
mirage13–30.0321%21 Jun
ancient13–100.0131%15 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0321%14 Jun
ancient14–160.0231%12 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0324%12 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0526%11 Jun
train13–60.0530%8 Jun
nuke13–100.0428%8 Jun
inferno19–17-0.0112%7 Jun
mirage14–160.0119%7 Jun
train13–100.1037%7 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0037%5 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0126%5 Jun
nuke13–70.0633%5 Jun
train13–10.0722%5 Jun
inferno13–110.0225%4 Jun
mirage13–70.0561%4 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0419%1 Jun
inferno13–70.1225%1 Jun
train13–50.1633%1 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0125%31 May
inferno13–10-0.0325%31 May
anubis16–130.0625%31 May
ancient16–130.0226%31 May
nuke13–160.0028%30 May
nuke10–13-0.0330%30 May
mirage8–13-0.0119%30 May
dust213–70.0437%30 May
mirage13–30.0431%29 May
ancient11–130.0318%29 May
ancient13–9-0.0122%29 May
nuke13–8-0.0042%29 May
brewery9–10.1631%29 May
nuke10–130.0223%27 May
anubis5–13-0.0143%27 May
inferno13–70.0433%27 May
dust213–20.0440%27 May
inferno3–7-0.0433%27 May
mirage13–9-0.0229%27 May
inferno10–130.0133%26 May
inferno13–7-0.0219%26 May
inferno9–70.0336%26 May
ancient13–20.0537%25 May
vertigo9–70.0031%25 May
ancient13–110.0937%18 May
mirage13–50.0526%18 May
mirage13–8-0.0331%18 May
nuke8–130.0136%18 May
anubis14–16-0.0426%14 May
dust219–150.0219%14 May
grail11–130.0841%11 May
mirage13–9-0.0234%11 May
dust213–70.0231%11 May
nuke16–140.0144%11 May
dust213–40.1538%11 May
dust216–140.0327%8 May
mirage13–8-0.0122%8 May
anubis11–13-0.0018%6 May
ancient7–13-0.0425%25 Apr
dust213–11-0.0325%14 Apr
mirage13–110.0320%6 Apr
nuke6–0-0.0217%6 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0125%6 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0519%6 Apr
dust213–40.0126%15 Mar
inferno13–70.0020%13 Mar
nuke13–50.0222%13 Mar
dust21–13-0.0022%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →