DevNergal

DevNergal — CS2 Stats

EE76561198279246751[U:1:318981023]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

881Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
704Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 21 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,228 -1,875 21 Mar22 May · 24 days played
7,61310,108peak 10,10821 Mar22 May
10,823Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-03-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate35.5%41.9%42.7%7.2% short
Shot accuracy11.8%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.170.981.00above
Match win rate41.4%43.3%43.9%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDevNergalFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim40
Positioning43
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT4654Last 10046%Win rateWWLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.0
Utility1.1
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.0
Positioning4.3
Utility1.1
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time618ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 10 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–11 · ancient, 20 May
453msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 8 May
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 22 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2291341%-0.04
infernoA1811761%-0.01
mirageC1771041%-0.04
anubisC114736%-0.03
ancientC104640%-0.01
dust2C94544%-0.04
cacheC52340%-0.02
overpass42250%-0.03
office330100%-0.04
alpine1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,404Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
2,051Matches
41.4%Match win rate
35.5%Headshot %
11.8%Shot accuracy
3,929MVPs
704Hours (in match)
1,625Bombs planted
234Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,174
AWP2,616
P901,871
XM10141,710
MP91,706
MAC-101,279
Molotov1,271
SSG 081,261

Lifetime map wins

2,889inferno
2,138nuke
1,827dust2
1,112office
723vertigo
303train
289cbble
94lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

133Matches
47%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
82.1ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2955%1.0413.9
Inferno2442%1.0415.2
Ancient1457%0.9114.4
Mirage1050%0.8815.0
Anubis425%0.7514.0
Dust2450%1.0215.5
Overpass475%0.8315.8
Train333%0.8214.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.7%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
618msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
35.2%CT opening success
0.11Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
7.48HE damage / grenade
0.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.7039% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1073 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9636% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0013%5 Aug
office13–2-0.040%17 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0619%17 Jun
office13–10-0.0610%10 Jun
mirage13–8-0.039%22 May
dust22–13-0.1014%22 May
ancient0–11-0.0450%20 May
cache13–11-0.0115%17 May
ancient13–6-0.019%17 May
inferno12–20.0613%17 May
cache13–30.0414%17 May
inferno13–100.0715%13 May
mirage6–13-0.066%13 May
dust26–130.0621%13 May
mirage8–13-0.047%10 May
inferno13–8-0.037%10 May
nuke13–7-0.019%10 May
nuke11–130.0313%9 May
mirage6–1-0.0221%8 May
cache11–13-0.0613%8 May
office13–2-0.022%8 May
inferno13–100.0311%8 May
inferno8–13-0.0410%8 May
ancient10–13-0.1110%8 May
inferno8–13-0.012%7 May
overpass9–130.0116%6 May
nuke8–13-0.0613%6 May
cache7–13-0.0810%29 Apr
cache6–130.006%28 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0810%28 Apr
nuke16–14-0.067%28 Apr
inferno10–130.029%28 Apr
dust213–4-0.0722%28 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0714%25 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0020%25 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0411%25 Apr
alpine10–130.0411%25 Apr
nuke2–13-0.096%25 Apr
inferno5–10-0.020%24 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0815%24 Apr
mirage16–13-0.029%24 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0113%24 Apr
nuke13–11-0.098%23 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0116%23 Apr
nuke4–13-0.079%23 Apr
nuke1–13-0.107%23 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0510%23 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0318%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.090%23 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0319%23 Apr
ancient4–13-0.019%22 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0515%22 Apr
mirage13–1-0.0312%22 Apr
dust216–12-0.0916%22 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0722%22 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0216%22 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0515%22 Apr
nuke6–130.0117%22 Apr
mirage8–13-0.067%13 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0222%13 Apr
nuke13–20.052%13 Apr
nuke13–110.0112%13 Apr
dust213–7-0.0612%11 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0513%10 Apr
dust213–11-0.066%10 Apr
mirage13–60.095%10 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0213%10 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0714%9 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0420%9 Apr
mirage5–13-0.1320%9 Apr
dust210–13-0.037%9 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0311%9 Apr
dust25–13-0.0210%9 Apr
inferno13–10-0.095%9 Apr
nuke13–80.0416%3 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0415%1 Apr
anubis10–130.0314%27 Mar
nuke7–13-0.075%26 Mar
nuke6–13-0.1231%26 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0211%26 Mar
ancient16–14-0.049%26 Mar
ancient13–9-0.006%26 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0510%25 Mar
anubis13–1-0.0713%25 Mar
inferno5–1-0.0738%25 Mar
dust24–130.0327%24 Mar
ancient4–130.0611%24 Mar
inferno13–11-0.027%24 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0619%23 Mar
anubis9–13-0.098%23 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0213%21 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0113%21 Mar
inferno4–130.0119%21 Mar
anubis13–6-0.008%21 Mar
anubis13–100.0112%21 Mar
ancient13–11-0.038%21 Mar
anubis9–13-0.044%21 Mar
nuke13–6-0.038%21 Mar
inferno13–70.0812%21 Mar
ancient7–130.089%21 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →