๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฎ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ท ํ•ด๋ฆฐ

๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฎ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ท ํ•ด๋ฆฐ โ€” CS2 Stats

KR76561198273998143[U:1:313732415]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

628Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
271Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#53522 of 224067 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 1 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,673 +1,674 6 Oct โ€“ 1 Apr ยท 25 days played
16,92821,740peak 21,7406 Oct1 Apr
21,740Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-10-01

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.2%45.7%46.8%5.5% short
Shot accuracy0.3%12.7%13.0%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.051.06meets
Match win rate51.0%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฎ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ท ํ•ด๋ฆฐFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning44
Utility51

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48โ€“47โ€“5Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’50pp win rate ยท +0.02 avg rating ยท +5.5pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’18ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“4 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 414ms

Last 10

  • 3โ€“7 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 11โ€“9 ยท 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility5.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 23% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time551msโˆ’1ms
first โ…“ avg 553ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%โˆ’0.9%
first โ…“ avg 16.8% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating ยท 13โ€“2 ยท dust2, 25 Dec โ†’
34%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“5 ยท dust2, 12 Oct โ†’
359msFastest reaction time ยท 0โ€“13 ยท inferno, 15 Jun โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท mirage, 31 Dec โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
9โ€“9In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map ยท 75% over 12infernoWeakest map ยท 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2410โ€“1442%-0.02
infernoC177โ€“1041%-0.01
dust2B168โ€“850%-0.00
ancientC167โ€“944%0.00
anubisS129โ€“375%0.01
overpassA106โ€“460%-0.00
nukeโ€”31โ€“233%0.02
trainโ€”20โ€“20%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,032Lifetime kills
1.07K/D ยท Top 50% of Level 7 players
730Matches
51.0%Match win rate ยท Top 25% of Level 7 players
41.2%Headshot %
0.3%Shot accuracy
1,411MVPs
271Hours (in match)
672Bombs planted
172Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,279inferno
775dust2
397vertigo
279nuke
81train
2office
1lake

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
62%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
80.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1173%1.5519.6
Mirage1155%1.3016.4
Inferno1070%1.5216.4
Anubis560%1.1520.0
Dust2333%1.2119.7
Vertigo10%1.0016.0
Overpass1100%1.2117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
66.3%Counter-strafing
10.6ยฐPreaim
561msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
7.58HE damage / grenade
10.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4881 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2641% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno0โ€“13-0.0325%15 Jun โ†’
dust20โ€“13-0.050%15 Jun โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0125%6 Jun โ†’
ancient6โ€“130.1033%6 Jun โ†’
mirage16โ€“12-0.0013%1 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0724%29 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.1022%29 Mar โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0613%27 Mar โ†’
dust27โ€“130.0026%27 Mar โ†’
ancient12โ€“160.1120%27 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.017%26 Mar โ†’
inferno1โ€“13-0.089%25 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0417%25 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.0724%25 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0913%25 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0317%25 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0016%25 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0222%25 Mar โ†’
anubis12โ€“16-0.0410%18 Mar โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.0512%18 Mar โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0910%18 Mar โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0314%18 Mar โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0611%15 Mar โ†’
dust215โ€“15-0.0417%15 Mar โ†’
inferno13โ€“8-0.047%14 Mar โ†’
overpass8โ€“130.0411%10 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.0326%8 Mar โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0714%6 Mar โ†’
anubis16โ€“140.0819%3 Mar โ†’
overpass13โ€“6-0.0012%3 Mar โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.003%3 Mar โ†’
train1โ€“13-0.0419%3 Mar โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0411%15 Feb โ†’
inferno16โ€“130.0114%15 Feb โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0115%15 Feb โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0424%4 Feb โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0122%4 Feb โ†’
mirage12โ€“12-0.058%4 Feb โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0211%28 Jan โ†’
dust26โ€“1-0.099%28 Jan โ†’
anubis15โ€“15-0.0510%28 Jan โ†’
overpass6โ€“13-0.0725%28 Jan โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0210%22 Jan โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.007%22 Jan โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.0210%22 Jan โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0418%16 Jan โ†’
overpass13โ€“40.0322%16 Jan โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0514%14 Jan โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0427%9 Jan โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0024%9 Jan โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0717%9 Jan โ†’
train8โ€“13-0.0715%5 Jan โ†’
inferno1โ€“13-0.049%5 Jan โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0410%5 Jan โ†’
overpass11โ€“13-0.0917%31 Dec โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0126%31 Dec โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0922%31 Dec โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0218%31 Dec โ†’
mirage13โ€“10.0114%31 Dec โ†’
mirage5โ€“130.0115%27 Dec โ†’
overpass16โ€“12-0.0319%25 Dec โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0626%25 Dec โ†’
dust213โ€“20.1221%25 Dec โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.0211%21 Dec โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0618%21 Dec โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0521%20 Dec โ†’
dust21โ€“6-0.0820%19 Dec โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0415%19 Dec โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0913%7 Dec โ†’
overpass13โ€“90.0223%7 Dec โ†’
inferno13โ€“8-0.0524%7 Dec โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0020%1 Dec โ†’
ancient16โ€“14-0.0317%1 Dec โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.039%1 Dec โ†’
ancient9โ€“13-0.0211%1 Dec โ†’
inferno16โ€“13-0.019%16 Nov โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.0113%16 Nov โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0313%16 Nov โ†’
overpass3โ€“13-0.039%7 Nov โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0510%7 Nov โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0123%7 Nov โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0320%6 Nov โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0113%29 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“3-0.0318%29 Oct โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0616%28 Oct โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0024%28 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0121%22 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0111%22 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0019%19 Oct โ†’
overpass13โ€“20.088%19 Oct โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0216%17 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.0712%17 Oct โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0314%16 Oct โ†’
ancient9โ€“13-0.0225%12 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0134%12 Oct โ†’
mirage3โ€“130.0026%12 Oct โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0323%12 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0823%6 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“6-0.0214%1 Oct โ†’
overpass13โ€“80.0110%1 Oct โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’