niik20

niik20 — CS2 Stats

MC76561198273645592[U:1:313379864]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

817Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,529Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,533Purple band · top ~26.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,103 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Jul 2026 (121 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,533 -2,014 5 Feb – 1 Jul · 6 days played
14,87917,547peak 17,5475 Feb1 Jul
17,547Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,103Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-01-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,103
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 98 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,014 below peak (17,547)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,467 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.1%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy19.5%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.031.05above
Match win rate67.7%45.2%45.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 7 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGniik20FACEITLevel 6 · 1,103 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,533 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,103csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning34
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–37–13Last 10050%Win rateTLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 719ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 713ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 703ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.7
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning3.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time690ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–1 · sanctum, 11 Mar →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · poseidon, 11 Mar →
469msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 3 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 6 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 14infernoWeakest map · 45% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB3920–1951%0.01
infernoB3315–1845%-0.01
mirageA148–657%-0.01
cache—31–233%-0.02
vertigo—31–233%0.01
poseidon—21–150%0.01
ancient—22–0100%-0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.04
sanctum—11–0100%0.24
anubis—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,236Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
9,686Matches
67.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 6 players
45.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
19.5%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
16,531MVPs
1,529Hours (in match)
4,311Bombs planted
835Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,899
AWP5,208
FAMAS2,638
MP92,226
MAC-101,738

Lifetime map wins

7,657inferno
2,239dust2
2,217nuke
1,386train
978cbble
960vertigo
346lake
192office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
71.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4951%0.9714.6
Inferno2065%1.0115.1
Ancient1735%0.9614.5
Anubis1741%0.8915.3
Nuke1573%1.2515.9
Vertigo540%1.0815.0
Dust2560%0.9013.4
Overpass450%1.0820.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
646msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
19.78HE damage / grenade
3.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.44 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7698% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.078%1 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0215%26 Jun →
mirage13–40.0822%26 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0519%24 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0223%11 Jun →
cache9–13-0.058%10 Jun →
poseidon9–40.0123%10 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.1117%10 Jun →
nuke6–9-0.0610%18 May →
ancient13–10-0.0015%16 May →
nuke13–7-0.059%16 May →
inferno12–16-0.0411%13 May →
mirage5–13-0.0517%13 May →
cache13–50.0615%12 May →
overpass13–80.0715%12 May →
cache10–13-0.0622%10 May →
inferno13–7-0.0224%8 May →
nuke9–6-0.0422%8 May →
inferno13–110.0129%6 May →
mirage13–10.0213%6 May →
inferno4–13-0.0820%6 May →
inferno7–13-0.0523%3 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.086%3 Apr →
nuke5–9-0.1113%1 Apr →
inferno8–80.059%1 Apr →
nuke5–9-0.0713%1 Apr →
nuke9–60.0514%1 Apr →
nuke7–90.0522%31 Mar →
inferno9–40.0126%31 Mar →
nuke9–60.0716%31 Mar →
nuke9–50.0013%30 Mar →
nuke8–8-0.0612%30 Mar →
nuke9–40.0121%30 Mar →
inferno9–00.1143%30 Mar →
nuke9–50.0821%18 Mar →
nuke7–90.0136%18 Mar →
inferno4–9-0.1215%18 Mar →
inferno9–70.0724%18 Mar →
nuke8–8-0.0128%18 Mar →
overpass2–9-0.1529%17 Mar →
nuke9–70.0627%17 Mar →
nuke8–80.0311%16 Mar →
inferno9–60.0118%12 Mar →
poseidon8–80.0248%11 Mar →
sanctum9–10.2414%11 Mar →
nuke9–7-0.018%11 Mar →
nuke9–50.0520%11 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.0513%11 Mar →
inferno9–6-0.0218%7 Mar →
nuke9–50.0010%7 Mar →
vertigo2–9-0.1614%28 Feb →
inferno9–50.1415%28 Feb →
nuke8–80.0738%26 Feb →
nuke8–8-0.0210%26 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.1219%26 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.0924%26 Feb →
nuke5–9-0.0819%26 Feb →
nuke9–50.1324%26 Feb →
inferno9–4-0.0717%26 Feb →
nuke9–50.0813%25 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.0611%25 Feb →
nuke1–9-0.1815%20 Feb →
nuke4–9-0.0427%20 Feb →
inferno6–9-0.1111%19 Feb →
nuke9–40.2018%19 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.0023%11 Feb →
vertigo9–30.158%11 Feb →
inferno7–9-0.1019%11 Feb →
mirage16–120.0020%10 Feb →
nuke9–6-0.0123%10 Feb →
nuke9–4-0.0320%10 Feb →
inferno9–7-0.0614%10 Feb →
nuke8–8-0.0526%10 Feb →
nuke9–4-0.0218%10 Feb →
inferno13–50.0222%5 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0116%5 Feb →
nuke7–90.0227%4 Feb →
inferno4–9-0.0715%4 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0325%4 Feb →
inferno13–50.1232%4 Feb →
inferno8–80.0222%4 Feb →
vertigo7–90.0417%4 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0216%3 Feb →
inferno9–20.1412%3 Feb →
nuke8–8-0.0319%3 Feb →
nuke9–10.2018%3 Feb →
nuke8–8-0.1228%3 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.0924%3 Feb →
mirage11–130.0023%2 Feb →
nuke9–40.1121%2 Feb →
inferno9–20.166%2 Feb →
nuke5–90.0021%2 Feb →
nuke9–40.1026%2 Feb →
nuke8–8-0.0834%1 Feb →
inferno9–60.1025%1 Feb →
mirage13–40.0033%1 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0213%1 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0717%1 Feb →
mirage13–80.0520%31 Jan →
mirage16–12-0.0323%31 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.