stomp

stomp — CS2 Stats

US76561198273598893[U:1:313333165]Steam profile ↗

2,457Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,262Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1065 of 10653 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,522 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstompFACEITLevel 6 · 1,522 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER26,262 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning58
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54379Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression8.0
Utility6.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time536ms−96ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — vertigo 13–2
130Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 77% over 13nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%-0.00
vertigoC167944%-0.00
dust2B157847%0.00
cacheA149564%0.02
infernoS1310377%0.02
nukeD93633%-0.00
anubisA74357%-0.02
ancient21150%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

500Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
72.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17949%0.8814.3
Dust28746%0.9215.0
Inferno7051%0.7813.4
Anubis4455%0.9014.9
Ancient3540%0.8814.7
Vertigo2458%0.9815.0
Nuke2462%0.9915.0
Cache1856%0.7812.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
528msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
16.09HE damage / grenade
8.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6559% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo3–12-0.129%31 Jul
cache13–8-0.0612%25 Jul
vertigo13–50.0213%25 Jul
vertigo13–70.0218%19 Jul
cache13–40.0718%17 Jul
vertigo13–20.1523%17 Jul
inferno13–30.1115%16 Jul
dust213–110.0727%16 Jul
vertigo12–120.0322%14 Jul
mirage9–130.0825%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0426%13 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0222%13 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0027%13 Jul
nuke16–140.0216%13 Jul
cache13–50.0324%13 Jul
cache13–160.0428%13 Jul
dust213–100.0816%12 Jul
inferno13–80.0920%12 Jul
mirage13–50.1019%12 Jul
anubis10–130.0328%12 Jul
nuke13–160.0628%12 Jul
mirage7–130.0222%12 Jul
cache13–100.0927%12 Jul
inferno13–90.0420%12 Jul
anubis13–90.0218%12 Jul
dust213–5-0.0231%11 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0318%11 Jul
cache13–60.0520%11 Jul
inferno13–30.1038%11 Jul
dust29–130.0231%11 Jul
inferno13–50.0122%11 Jul
nuke8–130.0623%11 Jul
mirage9–130.1123%11 Jul
dust213–70.0841%10 Jul
mirage15–150.0316%10 Jul
cache13–110.0225%10 Jul
inferno13–00.0323%10 Jul
dust213–70.0522%10 Jul
mirage13–8-0.059%9 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0419%9 Jul
vertigo12–120.0622%7 Jul
vertigo13–8-0.0317%3 Jul
cache12–12-0.0521%3 Jul
dust23–13-0.0216%3 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0118%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.0524%2 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0418%1 Jul
vertigo3–13-0.0921%29 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0328%28 Jun
vertigo1–13-0.0228%27 Jun
inferno13–10-0.039%27 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.0314%27 Jun
anubis12–120.0013%27 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0321%27 Jun
cache13–90.0247%27 Jun
inferno9–40.0228%26 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0227%26 Jun
cache13–60.0432%26 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0330%25 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0714%25 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0216%25 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0316%25 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0528%25 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0619%24 Jun
dust24–13-0.0928%24 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0625%24 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0426%24 Jun
dust23–13-0.0823%24 Jun
dust25–130.0430%24 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0323%24 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0525%24 Jun
cache12–12-0.0144%24 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0533%23 Jun
dust215–150.0024%23 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0437%23 Jun
dust29–13-0.0231%23 Jun
mirage4–50.0622%23 Jun
dust213–20.0417%23 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0532%22 Jun
vertigo12–120.0331%19 Jun
vertigo13–30.0115%17 Jun
cache10–130.0135%17 Jun
vertigo13–6-0.0420%17 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0618%15 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0917%15 Jun
nuke13–60.0119%6 Jun
vertigo11–130.0425%3 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0516%29 May
nuke7–13-0.0429%29 May
ancient12–16-0.0322%29 May
mirage2–130.0412%28 May
mirage13–7-0.0326%28 May
inferno3–13-0.0843%28 May
mirage11–130.0320%28 May
mirage13–4-0.0021%27 May
mirage13–2-0.0332%27 May
cache13–80.0115%27 May
nuke5–130.0042%27 May
dust213–7-0.0429%27 May
cache8–130.0238%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →